In this week's episode of The Great Game on Rogue News, Matt and V unpack some deep structure American history starting with the question: why did Andrew Jackson kill the bank of the United States? How did Jackson’s program unleash a perverse form of Manifest Destiny that carried out genocide against natives, spread black slavery, empowered a foreign-directed fifth column in the USA and justify a parasitic pax americana throughout the 20th century which several martyred presidents resisted?
We contrast this abomination of history to the positive traditions of manifest destiny advanced by renaissance humanist statesmen within the USA and beyond which sought to advance technological progress and political emancipation for all people regardless of ethnicity, race or creed while also cherishing the diversity of each member of civilization both domestically and globally.
We then analyze the ironic revival of this lost tradition with uniquely Eurasian characteristics by reviewing it's appearance in Russia (via Putin's Far East/Arctic Vision), China (via the New Silk Road) and Iran.
Matters of banking, Malthusian idiocy, the Great Reset, COP26 and the importance of the sovereign nation state are also treated at length in this episode.
Watch the program on Bitchute here
Watch it on Rumble here
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , and Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow. He is author of the ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series and Clash of the Two Americas (which you can purchase by clicking those links or the book covers below). In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation .
I have a lot of repect for your insights and your historical perspectives. However, telling people that their thinking is wrong is insulting and arrogant. While I agree with you that Xi is a political beast, it would have been great if he had posted himself as a beacon of light against the tyranny that the west is suffering under. Instead, people that are looking for hope did not find it in his speech. His speech was depressing. I also think that his speech can be interpreted as not getting in the way of an enemy that is is self destructing.
I was just introduced to your stuff and even though I think I disagree with you on ideology, we are in agreement regarding America. You’ll probably find this interesting: https://fascio.substack.com/p/civilizational-states-self-determination?utm_source=activity_item