Excellent discussion but should do again with more definitions in advance as it seems there are varying ideas of what oligarchs are and who is behind much used term , The West, which is another meaningless overused term as it designates nothing specific. Also might want to refer to Putin's speech in which he discusses the history of how Russia was attacked in WWII when they trusted 'the west' (what is that?) And then there were many relevant points left unanswered, such as Tom needing to explain why the Davos people will not be able to financialize nature, or Matthew to discuss why Russia and China don't seem to have different evidence or science on the fakedemic, since there is a great deal of variation in research in these countries which have long long histories, much longer than ours. In fact interesting to note that there are Russian historians discussing the real time line of human history, along with archeologists who are not in the mainstream, and it would seem to me that surely there must be some broader scientific ideas springing from their ancient civilizational background, although of course as Matthew has said, maybe they can't get rid of all the bought officials. Having worked in big pharma, I know that that entire system is corrupt (they laugh about making science say whatever they want it to say), but it is strange that we aren't hearing about the dissident voices of drs and scientists there, but we are hearing them here? Thoughts?
"Unfortunately, 95% of my subscribers did not receive my newsletter featuring my debate hosted by Whitney Webb and Off-Guardian which I sent this morning"
It's not just you comments are all over Substack users and writers are irate. Apparently Substack changed their publish function to give priority to their new app and promote that with total disregard for subscribers and writers. Now you need to click a box to send an email to everyone. It used to be a default. Would have been nice if they notified their content creators first!
I watched the debate! I am not sure it was a debate because so many ideas where being discussed. I agree with Matt and Tom mostly. However Ian and Riley did not seem to be saying anything much different. My take is that this was a 2 dimensional discussion debate. How can man through his own managerial skills sustain and economy and growing population? A huge task given the Supreme Being is assumed to be asleep and uninvolved. The great reset is supposedly driven by concern that human population is unsustainable. This is an apostate blasphemy statement. The third superior dimension is the Creator of this Universe who has the power and resources to sustain it. The Almighty Creator as evidenced by the Noahic Flood & Sodom and Gomorrah shows us that He has the power to destroy it. So the antithesis is also correct. I like Russia because their government seems to at least be attempting to let biblical/orthodox Christian Laws influence the governing of their nation. Not to say that the covid death scam was not a blight upon Russia's population. China, Canada, USA, Australia, UK, EU, New Zealand have governments that are overtly antichristian. I would say that Muslim is antichristian, however Mohammed did copy some of the OT and NT Christian law into his Koran though perversions exist. Modern Israel is hardly anything like the ancient Hebrews. Economic mathematical predictive models are a form of soothsaying. They attempt to foretell the future. The Old Testament Law strictly forbids soothsaying even when using Natural parameters in its computer algorithms. God commanded man to take dominion and fill the earth. He did not ask them to foretell the future. That is none of our business.
EUgenics / DeGenics is interesting. Suspect direction of travel laid out in the beautiful and terrifying film 'GATTACA'...
Bravo, Matt. I admire that you have climbed the ladder to work with so many heavy hitting alt media sources.
Excellent discussion but should do again with more definitions in advance as it seems there are varying ideas of what oligarchs are and who is behind much used term , The West, which is another meaningless overused term as it designates nothing specific. Also might want to refer to Putin's speech in which he discusses the history of how Russia was attacked in WWII when they trusted 'the west' (what is that?) And then there were many relevant points left unanswered, such as Tom needing to explain why the Davos people will not be able to financialize nature, or Matthew to discuss why Russia and China don't seem to have different evidence or science on the fakedemic, since there is a great deal of variation in research in these countries which have long long histories, much longer than ours. In fact interesting to note that there are Russian historians discussing the real time line of human history, along with archeologists who are not in the mainstream, and it would seem to me that surely there must be some broader scientific ideas springing from their ancient civilizational background, although of course as Matthew has said, maybe they can't get rid of all the bought officials. Having worked in big pharma, I know that that entire system is corrupt (they laugh about making science say whatever they want it to say), but it is strange that we aren't hearing about the dissident voices of drs and scientists there, but we are hearing them here? Thoughts?
Nkmm
"Unfortunately, 95% of my subscribers did not receive my newsletter featuring my debate hosted by Whitney Webb and Off-Guardian which I sent this morning"
It's not just you comments are all over Substack users and writers are irate. Apparently Substack changed their publish function to give priority to their new app and promote that with total disregard for subscribers and writers. Now you need to click a box to send an email to everyone. It used to be a default. Would have been nice if they notified their content creators first!
I watched the debate! I am not sure it was a debate because so many ideas where being discussed. I agree with Matt and Tom mostly. However Ian and Riley did not seem to be saying anything much different. My take is that this was a 2 dimensional discussion debate. How can man through his own managerial skills sustain and economy and growing population? A huge task given the Supreme Being is assumed to be asleep and uninvolved. The great reset is supposedly driven by concern that human population is unsustainable. This is an apostate blasphemy statement. The third superior dimension is the Creator of this Universe who has the power and resources to sustain it. The Almighty Creator as evidenced by the Noahic Flood & Sodom and Gomorrah shows us that He has the power to destroy it. So the antithesis is also correct. I like Russia because their government seems to at least be attempting to let biblical/orthodox Christian Laws influence the governing of their nation. Not to say that the covid death scam was not a blight upon Russia's population. China, Canada, USA, Australia, UK, EU, New Zealand have governments that are overtly antichristian. I would say that Muslim is antichristian, however Mohammed did copy some of the OT and NT Christian law into his Koran though perversions exist. Modern Israel is hardly anything like the ancient Hebrews. Economic mathematical predictive models are a form of soothsaying. They attempt to foretell the future. The Old Testament Law strictly forbids soothsaying even when using Natural parameters in its computer algorithms. God commanded man to take dominion and fill the earth. He did not ask them to foretell the future. That is none of our business.