Early last April, Dr. Luc Montagnier, the Nobel-prize winning virologist who led a team including Dr. Judy Mikovitz in sequences the HIV virus in 1983, made waves by claiming that COVID-19 had the markings of a laboratory-grown creation. If this is proven true, then the entire narrative for the coordinated global shutdown of the world economy, mass quarantining, and vaccination protocols being pushed by the WHO, and World Economic Forum are not just wrong, but potentially criminally so.
Brilliant piece again, mon ami! I must have mentioned to you that my doctor treas my sciatic nerve problems quite succesfully with scalar waves. Usually, the pain is gone after 36 to 48 hours. He is convinced that amoeba are causing the problem, so he kills them electomagnetically. The device he uses is called... SPOOKY!
The work of Montagnier is indeed exciting, as you so highlight. However, the mysteries of viruses — and not just this current one supposedly afoot causing so much undue and yet controlling fear, but also the existence of ANY virus — remains a burning question for more and more of us who wish the old debate pitting Germ Theory and Terrain Theory against one another to finally get the public hearing we so need and deserve at this crucial moment of truth telling.
There are a number people out there who’ve stepped up the exchanges about this topic, and who also address important questions about illness and disese itself, such as Drs. Andrew Kaufman, Thomas Cowan, Stefan Lanka and Barre Lando — who have shown that Antoine Bechamp effectively countered Louis Pasteur’s germ theory by demonstrating the extent to which terrain theory provided real explanations for disease causality.
And Kaufman has raised the issue of exosomes as elements which have been mistaken for viruses, while pleomorphism is also another factor to explain how the body manufactures various maicrobes custom to the job of breaking down and cleaning up toxic sites in the body. The word “virus” itself is a Latin word that long meant poison or toxin, and hardly suggests any living entity whatsoever… until microscopes were invented and some began to label what they saw without proper understanding. And since that result has been carried forward as only theoretically true, it has come to provoke the question of who stands to benefit from the existence of any virus?
As for Montagnier, he seems disingenuous, to say the very least, in light of the above, although perhaps he had no choice at the time. For a start, since he got his Nobel for “discovering” HIV, I’ve questioned whether he actually believes in the viral paradigm, or whether it was his chance to get the prized recognition, while merely upholding the paradigm conveniently, since the Nobel would come with possibilities of funding for his own project (i.e., the research into DNA, electromagnetic waves and residual effects in water).
Also, although it would have been difficult to contradict accepted positions on viruses, he nonetheless later added intrigue and made a public splash in saying that HIV was just a “passenger virus” (in the “House of Numbers” film many tried to censor) and that the average person with normal functioning immunity would roll it over and be good to go… Sounds almost like he knows there’s actually no virus, and therefore pushes immune response as the normal factor involved with restoring health — which even now remains the most sensible position to maintain, as opposed to an immune system that could be fatally overcome by a microbe of any kind — as opposed to toxins. (Incidentally, he has also promoted the glutathione pre-cursor Immunocal.)
And yet his research, with money eventually coming from China and which nicely set him up in Shanghai with a lab in his name, involves using DNA fragments of “various viruses and bacteria.” Once again, he’s either playing the game (knowing that viruses are just some kind of non-infectious microbe or non-living genetic material)… or is it possible to think he’s genuinely unable to sort out the truth and maintains a “working” belief in viruses? After all, the “red field” electron microscopy that allows for a live view of microbes and their actions, which are otherwise frozen in static slide samples seen in regular microscopy (where their presence is liable to increased errors in identification), is what has been cited by Kaufman, Cowan and Barre in various discussions online when indicating proper means for assessing the nature of the microbes being viewed.
The China factor seems problematic, and with Montagnier also suggesting that Covid was made in a Chinese lab, it’s hard to know what sense to make at this point about him. The “China lab narrative” option, which some observers took up, did create an anticipation that it might help defuse a second viral wave forecast, but unfortunately did not exceed the machinations of control being exercized to keep the pandemic otherwise alive (not to mention that Guang statement coming up only now in February 2021).
I’ve always thought that that Montagnier’s work might substantially contribute, for example, something real to a wider view of understanding homeopathy’s efficacy and validity (since the subtle areas of frequencies and energetic effects in both seem relational in some sense), and so I never wanted to rule out his work. But when it comes to verifying the existence of viruses, it’s not clear for example whether Montagnier even employed Koch’s Postulates to do so, whereby KP is still the gold standard for doing just that.
However, some of the exchanges I’ve seen between Dr. Kaufman and Dr. Mikovits — who worked under Montagnier, and who even now insists on the existence of HIV, even while discrediting the existence of the current CV19 virus — have been very interesting for witnessing how someone as credentialled as Mikovits resorts to description of actions instead of an valid explanation of the actions of entitites (and description vs. explanation occurs more often than not in the sciences). It also resurrects the early exposes about HIV that Dr. Peter Duesberg tried to perform, as well as Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test that has been routinely used to diagnose all viral outbreaks since HIV, and yet a test (he maintained) which could not possibly be used in any diagnostic manner, and was not designed to do that.
In closing, I will recommend a search (on various platforms, although less on YouTube and more on Bitchute, Odyssee, and library.tv for non-censored availability) for videos of the above people discussing not just the reality of a non-existence of viruses, but even calling into question contagious diseases as well. Their arguments are well-reasoned and challenging by people who have performed a great deal of dilligence. They show how language itself has been deceptively used in “proving” the existence of viruses.
A recent statement issued by Kaufman and Cowan to demonstrate that the virus has never been isolated, and therefore proven to exist:
Seems that it should be, Luc Montagnier beware. At any rate, I can't find the full video, LaRouche PAC page says it's missing. do you have another link or more on that? Have you seen Gerald Pollack's work on structure and charge in water?
As a side thought, given the seemingly critical importance of the background ~7Hz EM field, such as the Schumann resonance of the earth-ionosphere, to initiate the generation and propagation of the cellular/DNA fields and information transfer within a functioning biological system, I wonder if the future pioneers of longer term space travel will find themselves suffering from some EM scurvy of sorts, creating mysterious maladies from the lack of the necessary background EM fields when away from the earth environment.
ps... Any folk interested in this aggregate EM stuff should have a google around 'The God Helmet' and Persigers work...That's when stuff starts to get REALLY wierd... ;)
Well, well, well ...Little that I know about you Mr Ehret, I hadn't expected you to be quite so up to speed on this! This is one of the best english articles on the subject I have read to date! Given you are based in Moscow, I'm slightly surprised no mention of Peter Garyaev? And given your interest in #TheGreatCovid19Fraud etc. I'm slightly Surprised no mention that first Garyaev, and then Montagnier (Who took over Garyaev's research on his death) BOTH died (somewhat unexplainedly) during the PseudoPandemic. I read neither Russian nor Chinese, so I don't know who/where is now carrying their torch. Do you?
I don't suppose you have looked at Dr. Tom Cowan's work on this. His book, "Cancer and the new biology of water", along with his statements on virology.
And on the energy subject, you absolutely need to look at Dr. Judy Wood's book of evidence supporting the use of a new field interference weapon on 911. I sure hope that the Eurasian powers know about that, because if they don't, their nuclear bombs are going to be dematerialized at the molecular level by the field interference capabilities of the british empire. drjudywood.com. The book contains all the evidence, she took the case to court and was refused even though she was right, the judge decided not to try the case. Because he wanted to live.
I like to comment but from completely new angle! I love to read these discoveries and findings of science of life! One thing that I notice is that of complete omission of our Creator of life and his "expert opinion"! I his book the Bible, namely Daniel 11:40-45 he has already long ago sanctioned the development that is going on today! King of south stands for USA and king of north represents British empire (not UK as such)....much more information can be found in the book: https://jehovah-is-king.com/ that is now translated into 7 languages.
Having done research into Rife therapies and the like ,I would submit that the frequencies specific to any ailment have already been found as Damien has alluded to on the below post .Cheers!
Brilliant piece again, mon ami! I must have mentioned to you that my doctor treas my sciatic nerve problems quite succesfully with scalar waves. Usually, the pain is gone after 36 to 48 hours. He is convinced that amoeba are causing the problem, so he kills them electomagnetically. The device he uses is called... SPOOKY!
Royal Raymond Rife, used a similar technology for curing cancer in the 1930s
https://thedissedent.page/2021/11/07/morris-fishbein-ama-enemyof-american-health/
\\][//
The work of Montagnier is indeed exciting, as you so highlight. However, the mysteries of viruses — and not just this current one supposedly afoot causing so much undue and yet controlling fear, but also the existence of ANY virus — remains a burning question for more and more of us who wish the old debate pitting Germ Theory and Terrain Theory against one another to finally get the public hearing we so need and deserve at this crucial moment of truth telling.
There are a number people out there who’ve stepped up the exchanges about this topic, and who also address important questions about illness and disese itself, such as Drs. Andrew Kaufman, Thomas Cowan, Stefan Lanka and Barre Lando — who have shown that Antoine Bechamp effectively countered Louis Pasteur’s germ theory by demonstrating the extent to which terrain theory provided real explanations for disease causality.
And Kaufman has raised the issue of exosomes as elements which have been mistaken for viruses, while pleomorphism is also another factor to explain how the body manufactures various maicrobes custom to the job of breaking down and cleaning up toxic sites in the body. The word “virus” itself is a Latin word that long meant poison or toxin, and hardly suggests any living entity whatsoever… until microscopes were invented and some began to label what they saw without proper understanding. And since that result has been carried forward as only theoretically true, it has come to provoke the question of who stands to benefit from the existence of any virus?
As for Montagnier, he seems disingenuous, to say the very least, in light of the above, although perhaps he had no choice at the time. For a start, since he got his Nobel for “discovering” HIV, I’ve questioned whether he actually believes in the viral paradigm, or whether it was his chance to get the prized recognition, while merely upholding the paradigm conveniently, since the Nobel would come with possibilities of funding for his own project (i.e., the research into DNA, electromagnetic waves and residual effects in water).
Also, although it would have been difficult to contradict accepted positions on viruses, he nonetheless later added intrigue and made a public splash in saying that HIV was just a “passenger virus” (in the “House of Numbers” film many tried to censor) and that the average person with normal functioning immunity would roll it over and be good to go… Sounds almost like he knows there’s actually no virus, and therefore pushes immune response as the normal factor involved with restoring health — which even now remains the most sensible position to maintain, as opposed to an immune system that could be fatally overcome by a microbe of any kind — as opposed to toxins. (Incidentally, he has also promoted the glutathione pre-cursor Immunocal.)
And yet his research, with money eventually coming from China and which nicely set him up in Shanghai with a lab in his name, involves using DNA fragments of “various viruses and bacteria.” Once again, he’s either playing the game (knowing that viruses are just some kind of non-infectious microbe or non-living genetic material)… or is it possible to think he’s genuinely unable to sort out the truth and maintains a “working” belief in viruses? After all, the “red field” electron microscopy that allows for a live view of microbes and their actions, which are otherwise frozen in static slide samples seen in regular microscopy (where their presence is liable to increased errors in identification), is what has been cited by Kaufman, Cowan and Barre in various discussions online when indicating proper means for assessing the nature of the microbes being viewed.
The China factor seems problematic, and with Montagnier also suggesting that Covid was made in a Chinese lab, it’s hard to know what sense to make at this point about him. The “China lab narrative” option, which some observers took up, did create an anticipation that it might help defuse a second viral wave forecast, but unfortunately did not exceed the machinations of control being exercized to keep the pandemic otherwise alive (not to mention that Guang statement coming up only now in February 2021).
I’ve always thought that that Montagnier’s work might substantially contribute, for example, something real to a wider view of understanding homeopathy’s efficacy and validity (since the subtle areas of frequencies and energetic effects in both seem relational in some sense), and so I never wanted to rule out his work. But when it comes to verifying the existence of viruses, it’s not clear for example whether Montagnier even employed Koch’s Postulates to do so, whereby KP is still the gold standard for doing just that.
However, some of the exchanges I’ve seen between Dr. Kaufman and Dr. Mikovits — who worked under Montagnier, and who even now insists on the existence of HIV, even while discrediting the existence of the current CV19 virus — have been very interesting for witnessing how someone as credentialled as Mikovits resorts to description of actions instead of an valid explanation of the actions of entitites (and description vs. explanation occurs more often than not in the sciences). It also resurrects the early exposes about HIV that Dr. Peter Duesberg tried to perform, as well as Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test that has been routinely used to diagnose all viral outbreaks since HIV, and yet a test (he maintained) which could not possibly be used in any diagnostic manner, and was not designed to do that.
In closing, I will recommend a search (on various platforms, although less on YouTube and more on Bitchute, Odyssee, and library.tv for non-censored availability) for videos of the above people discussing not just the reality of a non-existence of viruses, but even calling into question contagious diseases as well. Their arguments are well-reasoned and challenging by people who have performed a great deal of dilligence. They show how language itself has been deceptively used in “proving” the existence of viruses.
A recent statement issued by Kaufman and Cowan to demonstrate that the virus has never been isolated, and therefore proven to exist:
https://bit.ly/3svrmzV
Also, a response to Mikovits by the above in a video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Dnqf3pCdWmhv/
Seems that it should be, Luc Montagnier beware. At any rate, I can't find the full video, LaRouche PAC page says it's missing. do you have another link or more on that? Have you seen Gerald Pollack's work on structure and charge in water?
Matt ...just amazing with your info..and timelines...things I have not heard before...quite strong REDPILLS!
Star Trek Tech!!
Fascinating potential for new scientific discoveries. it seems it would be so much more fun, than writing algorithms for stock market swindlers.
Magnificent -- going to make a coffee and digest it again ... I took the liberty of sending you a mail...
As a side thought, given the seemingly critical importance of the background ~7Hz EM field, such as the Schumann resonance of the earth-ionosphere, to initiate the generation and propagation of the cellular/DNA fields and information transfer within a functioning biological system, I wonder if the future pioneers of longer term space travel will find themselves suffering from some EM scurvy of sorts, creating mysterious maladies from the lack of the necessary background EM fields when away from the earth environment.
ps... Any folk interested in this aggregate EM stuff should have a google around 'The God Helmet' and Persigers work...That's when stuff starts to get REALLY wierd... ;)
Well, well, well ...Little that I know about you Mr Ehret, I hadn't expected you to be quite so up to speed on this! This is one of the best english articles on the subject I have read to date! Given you are based in Moscow, I'm slightly surprised no mention of Peter Garyaev? And given your interest in #TheGreatCovid19Fraud etc. I'm slightly Surprised no mention that first Garyaev, and then Montagnier (Who took over Garyaev's research on his death) BOTH died (somewhat unexplainedly) during the PseudoPandemic. I read neither Russian nor Chinese, so I don't know who/where is now carrying their torch. Do you?
I don't suppose you have looked at Dr. Tom Cowan's work on this. His book, "Cancer and the new biology of water", along with his statements on virology.
And on the energy subject, you absolutely need to look at Dr. Judy Wood's book of evidence supporting the use of a new field interference weapon on 911. I sure hope that the Eurasian powers know about that, because if they don't, their nuclear bombs are going to be dematerialized at the molecular level by the field interference capabilities of the british empire. drjudywood.com. The book contains all the evidence, she took the case to court and was refused even though she was right, the judge decided not to try the case. Because he wanted to live.
I like to comment but from completely new angle! I love to read these discoveries and findings of science of life! One thing that I notice is that of complete omission of our Creator of life and his "expert opinion"! I his book the Bible, namely Daniel 11:40-45 he has already long ago sanctioned the development that is going on today! King of south stands for USA and king of north represents British empire (not UK as such)....much more information can be found in the book: https://jehovah-is-king.com/ that is now translated into 7 languages.
besides Raymond Rife, lets not forget Georges Lakovsky
Having done research into Rife therapies and the like ,I would submit that the frequencies specific to any ailment have already been found as Damien has alluded to on the below post .Cheers!
https://thingumbobesquire.blogspot.com/2011/04/pacemaker-or-autowaves-biophysical-and.html