Excellent article and right on target. The Anti-Nuclear forces on this Earth are led & financed by the Malthusian Club-Of-Rome Psychopath Bankster Parasites. Just listen to what they have stated and what their well funded minions say:
From THE GLOBAL REVOLUTION by The Club of Rome 1991 "Because of the sudden absence of traditional enemies, "new enemies must be identified."[2] "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."[3]
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest"
Paul Warburg, the International Banker testifying to the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in 1950
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis."
David Rockefeller, Club of Rome executive manager
Depopulation: "I Hope It Can Occur In a Civil Manner"
"The World can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion"
" I know in one way or another it's going to come back down so I don't hope to avoid that, I hope that it can occur in a civil way "
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries.”
David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991
“This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long – We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller, Club of Rome, Sept. 23, 1994
“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will.
If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
from David Rockefeller’s autobiography ‘Memoirs’
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order (referring to the 1991 L.A. riot). Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Henry Kissinger @ Bilderberg Conference, Evaians, France 1991
Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State quoted in Time magazine on July 20, 1992: “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea.”
" Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it. "
Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute
" The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet. "
Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation
" Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun. "
Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University
" A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation "
John Holdren Obama Science Czar
"In Nature organic growth proceeds according to a Master Plan, a Blueprint. Such a master plan is missing from the process of growth and development of the world system. Now is the time to draw up a master plan for sustainable growth and world development based on global allocation of all resources and a new global economic system. Ten or twenty years from today it will probably be too late."
Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
"The concept of national sovereignty has been immutable, indeed a sacred principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation."
UN Commission on Global Governance report
"Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today's problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time."
Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution
"In my view, after fifty years of service in the United National system, I perceive the utmost urgency and absolute necessity for proper Earth government. There is no shadow of a doubt that the present political and economic systems are no longer appropriate and will lead to the end of life evolution on this planet. We must therefore absolutely and urgently look for new ways."
Dr. Robert Muller, UN Assistant Secretary General
"Nations are in effect ceding portions of their sovereignty to the international community and beginning to create a new system of international environmental governance as a means of solving otherwise unmanageable crises."
Lester Brown, WorldWatch Institute
"A keen and anxious awareness is evolving to suggest that fundamental changes will have to take place in the world order and its power structures, in the distribution of wealth and income."
Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
"Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable."
Maurice Strong, Rio Earth Summit
"All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution
"The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man."
Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
"A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells, the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions."
Prof. Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb
"A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible."
United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor
"The resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion."
To destroy any organism you turn off its power plants, it’s mitochondria, or equivalent. Without fuel, ATP, the organism DIES.
To destroy any society you turn off its power stations, these are directly correlated to domestic GDP. WITHOUT energy, the money dies, the society dies, the people die.
Yes, but then also their control gadget CBDC won't function anymore. . . And yes, at the end of the day it all must lead to their depopulation agenda, which ought to "save" the planet.
The Japanese still live in the two cities bombed by the US. Both have a population equal to or more than after the 1945 bombing. Both towns have low-level radiation.
As ALWAYS, such well constructed, researched and most informative INSIGHTS from Matt Ehret (Rising Tide Foundation).
Insights/facts/knowledge, which one can and are used to inform others with such certainty of said information, that can and is utilised to elucidate to those finding their way in and through this part of History (being made) and dealt with.
Hmm... Chernobyl, that started the fears around the world, happened in a country whose economy is completely reliant on petrol sales.
Hmm... the Fukushima scare, which killed no one, put the final nail in the coffin for Japan's production competitor Germany, while Japan keeps on using and restarting their nuclear reactors.
Hmm... while Sweden went along with Europe, they have now declared that they will replace any nuclear reactors with new ones, giving them the advantage over Germany for cheap energy.
If the real reason for anti-nuclear would be danger, then that should be the reason they give, not this non-green lie.
The LNT model for some reason brought to mind 'flatlining' which could perhaps be imaginatively associated with the concept of 'two weeks to flatten the curve'!
I watched this video of a public meeting, which I came across on the "World Doctors Alliance" group on the Telegram app, and thought it was a very helpful, constructive, non-threatening approach.
This lady did NONE of the "this is what I know that you ought to know" attitude that you find with 00DEZ, for example. She is merely offering help and support to help people with what they want to achieve, with the situational awareness that they already have.
The difficulty that people experience with the "you need to wake up to this" approach is that not everyone is in the same position, and some or many feel threatened and get either defensive, or aggressive, or dismiss things that conflict with how they understand the world currently.
The recognition that people need the help and co-operation of other like-minded people, on the other hand, is pretty universal.
I have to assume that eventually the Germans will come to their sense and re-establish some kind of realistic energy policy. The only question is how long that will take and what will be the impact on the economic viability of their industry and society as a whole
For what its worth, the Netherlands, where I live, appears to be bucking this disastrous trend; last in 2022 the gov announced plans to build two new nuclear power plants that would, if things go according to plan, go online in 2035. We are less directly dependent on Russian gas than other European countries, but we are, thanks to the EU energy market liberalization policies, subject to the whims of "the market", and we have seen energy prices skyrocket here. It is all very precarious.
I do however find it challenging that you encourage centralized power generation.
I would point out that “windmills’ grind seeds - hence “mill”. You are referring to wind turbines.
Renewable energy from the wind and sun seems win-win as a natural and plentiful resource, and many would enjoy the revolution of wind sails, as we did as children watching them turn.
The technology of PVs are being continually developed and will reach a point where the components would be thoroughly recycled at end of life.
I was a little amused that you referred to Boeing as Boing. I do hope this observation doesn’t bounce back critically on your observations…
Oh god, another graduate of the Cinderella School of Energy. In the USA per household primary energy production is 26300 TWh/128M households = 563 kwh/day or 23.5 kw avg continuously year round. So tell us how you figure you can generated that much energy per household with your solar panels and wind turbines? Show us you calculations.
Vaclav Smil has written about the Four Pillars of Modern Civilization: Ammonia, Plastic, Steel & Cement. That's what keeps us alive. Now tell us how you figure on producing those essential elements with your warm sunshine & cool breezes.
And wind / solar are highly centralized energy production. I can't believe how these dimwits see some solar or wind site way out in the boonies somewhere and say: "Hey, look its decentralized". Yeah you have a 300MW wind or solar installation and a small town nearby that uses 1MW so that really works. Instead of having a power plant ADJACENT to its consumers, you have one way out in a rural area where giant transmission lines must carry that to the cities. That's NOT decentralized. That's energy centralized far, far from load centers in rural areas.
That most decentralized energy supplies that you can have are those based upon Small Modular Reactors or Methanol ( which can be both produced & consumed in a decentralized way).
I watched this video of a public meeting, which I came across on the "World Doctors Alliance" group on the Telegram app, and thought it was a very helpful, constructive, non-threatening approach.
This lady did NONE of the "this is what I know that you ought to know" attitude that you find with 00DEZ, for example. She is merely offering help and support to help people with what they want to achieve, with the situational awareness that they already have.
The difficulty that people experience with the "you need to wake up to this" approach is that not everyone is in the same position, and some or many feel threatened and get either defensive, or aggressive, or dismiss things that conflict with how they understand the world currently.
The recognition that people need the help and co-operation of other like-minded people, on the other hand, is pretty universal.
Excellent article and right on target. The Anti-Nuclear forces on this Earth are led & financed by the Malthusian Club-Of-Rome Psychopath Bankster Parasites. Just listen to what they have stated and what their well funded minions say:
From THE GLOBAL REVOLUTION by The Club of Rome 1991 "Because of the sudden absence of traditional enemies, "new enemies must be identified."[2] "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."[3]
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest"
Paul Warburg, the International Banker testifying to the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in 1950
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis."
David Rockefeller, Club of Rome executive manager
Depopulation: "I Hope It Can Occur In a Civil Manner"
"The World can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion"
" I know in one way or another it's going to come back down so I don't hope to avoid that, I hope that it can occur in a civil way "
(i.e. Plandemic and deadly forced vaccines):
Club of Rome former director Dennis Meadows
https://rumble.com/v14uz0z-depopulation-i-hope-it-can-occur-in-a-civil-manner-club-of-romes-dennis-mea.html
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries.”
David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991
“This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long – We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller, Club of Rome, Sept. 23, 1994
“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will.
If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
from David Rockefeller’s autobiography ‘Memoirs’
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order (referring to the 1991 L.A. riot). Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Henry Kissinger @ Bilderberg Conference, Evaians, France 1991
Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State quoted in Time magazine on July 20, 1992: “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea.”
" Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it. "
Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute
" The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet. "
Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation
" Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun. "
Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University
" A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation "
John Holdren Obama Science Czar
"In Nature organic growth proceeds according to a Master Plan, a Blueprint. Such a master plan is missing from the process of growth and development of the world system. Now is the time to draw up a master plan for sustainable growth and world development based on global allocation of all resources and a new global economic system. Ten or twenty years from today it will probably be too late."
Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
"The concept of national sovereignty has been immutable, indeed a sacred principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation."
UN Commission on Global Governance report
"Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today's problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time."
Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution
"In my view, after fifty years of service in the United National system, I perceive the utmost urgency and absolute necessity for proper Earth government. There is no shadow of a doubt that the present political and economic systems are no longer appropriate and will lead to the end of life evolution on this planet. We must therefore absolutely and urgently look for new ways."
Dr. Robert Muller, UN Assistant Secretary General
"Nations are in effect ceding portions of their sovereignty to the international community and beginning to create a new system of international environmental governance as a means of solving otherwise unmanageable crises."
Lester Brown, WorldWatch Institute
"A keen and anxious awareness is evolving to suggest that fundamental changes will have to take place in the world order and its power structures, in the distribution of wealth and income."
Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
"Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable."
Maurice Strong, Rio Earth Summit
"All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution
"The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man."
Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
"A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells, the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions."
Prof. Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb
"A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible."
United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor
"The resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion."
Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind
FS Smith,
Your time spent researching for your fulsome comment above is much appreciated-
after WW1&2 switching the Enemy from Germans to Germs! was Not a very big step!
To destroy any organism you turn off its power plants, it’s mitochondria, or equivalent. Without fuel, ATP, the organism DIES.
To destroy any society you turn off its power stations, these are directly correlated to domestic GDP. WITHOUT energy, the money dies, the society dies, the people die.
This is their plan.
Yes, but then also their control gadget CBDC won't function anymore. . . And yes, at the end of the day it all must lead to their depopulation agenda, which ought to "save" the planet.
terracarta.world
Great old recording on the nuclear scare scam: https://youtu.be/ROAO1saHEvs
2+2=fish
Clown world.
Thank you Matthew for being a sound mind and voice in an insane world
Thanks again Matt for providing the only comprehensive knowledge true leaders must apply if humane governance is their goal. Godspeed !
The Japanese still live in the two cities bombed by the US. Both have a population equal to or more than after the 1945 bombing. Both towns have low-level radiation.
As ALWAYS, such well constructed, researched and most informative INSIGHTS from Matt Ehret (Rising Tide Foundation).
Insights/facts/knowledge, which one can and are used to inform others with such certainty of said information, that can and is utilised to elucidate to those finding their way in and through this part of History (being made) and dealt with.
Amazing article - many thanks!
Hmm... Chernobyl, that started the fears around the world, happened in a country whose economy is completely reliant on petrol sales.
Hmm... the Fukushima scare, which killed no one, put the final nail in the coffin for Japan's production competitor Germany, while Japan keeps on using and restarting their nuclear reactors.
Hmm... while Sweden went along with Europe, they have now declared that they will replace any nuclear reactors with new ones, giving them the advantage over Germany for cheap energy.
If the real reason for anti-nuclear would be danger, then that should be the reason they give, not this non-green lie.
Galen Winsor - 1986 - swimming in nuclear waste... and drinking it... @ 50.00 min+
https://sovren.media/p/221762/9951593badae88e3107fc700ab9bc7ac
The LNT model for some reason brought to mind 'flatlining' which could perhaps be imaginatively associated with the concept of 'two weeks to flatten the curve'!
https://rumble.com/v2jz31c-peoples-health-alliance-open-meeting-held-at-paulton-2042023-katherine-macb.html
I watched this video of a public meeting, which I came across on the "World Doctors Alliance" group on the Telegram app, and thought it was a very helpful, constructive, non-threatening approach.
This lady did NONE of the "this is what I know that you ought to know" attitude that you find with 00DEZ, for example. She is merely offering help and support to help people with what they want to achieve, with the situational awareness that they already have.
The difficulty that people experience with the "you need to wake up to this" approach is that not everyone is in the same position, and some or many feel threatened and get either defensive, or aggressive, or dismiss things that conflict with how they understand the world currently.
The recognition that people need the help and co-operation of other like-minded people, on the other hand, is pretty universal.
And add the gigantic plus plus of geothermal drilling technology being pioneered in Canada.
Cheers
John Loty
I have to assume that eventually the Germans will come to their sense and re-establish some kind of realistic energy policy. The only question is how long that will take and what will be the impact on the economic viability of their industry and society as a whole
For what its worth, the Netherlands, where I live, appears to be bucking this disastrous trend; last in 2022 the gov announced plans to build two new nuclear power plants that would, if things go according to plan, go online in 2035. We are less directly dependent on Russian gas than other European countries, but we are, thanks to the EU energy market liberalization policies, subject to the whims of "the market", and we have seen energy prices skyrocket here. It is all very precarious.
From the NOS (in Dutch): https://nos.nl/artikel/2455721-kabinet-versneld-twee-nieuwe-kerncentrales-in-borssele
Thank you, Matt ! I will share this on my GETTR page.
Greatest respect to you and your presentations.
I do however find it challenging that you encourage centralized power generation.
I would point out that “windmills’ grind seeds - hence “mill”. You are referring to wind turbines.
Renewable energy from the wind and sun seems win-win as a natural and plentiful resource, and many would enjoy the revolution of wind sails, as we did as children watching them turn.
The technology of PVs are being continually developed and will reach a point where the components would be thoroughly recycled at end of life.
I was a little amused that you referred to Boeing as Boing. I do hope this observation doesn’t bounce back critically on your observations…
Oh god, another graduate of the Cinderella School of Energy. In the USA per household primary energy production is 26300 TWh/128M households = 563 kwh/day or 23.5 kw avg continuously year round. So tell us how you figure you can generated that much energy per household with your solar panels and wind turbines? Show us you calculations.
Vaclav Smil has written about the Four Pillars of Modern Civilization: Ammonia, Plastic, Steel & Cement. That's what keeps us alive. Now tell us how you figure on producing those essential elements with your warm sunshine & cool breezes.
And wind / solar are highly centralized energy production. I can't believe how these dimwits see some solar or wind site way out in the boonies somewhere and say: "Hey, look its decentralized". Yeah you have a 300MW wind or solar installation and a small town nearby that uses 1MW so that really works. Instead of having a power plant ADJACENT to its consumers, you have one way out in a rural area where giant transmission lines must carry that to the cities. That's NOT decentralized. That's energy centralized far, far from load centers in rural areas.
That most decentralized energy supplies that you can have are those based upon Small Modular Reactors or Methanol ( which can be both produced & consumed in a decentralized way).
https://rumble.com/v2jz31c-peoples-health-alliance-open-meeting-held-at-paulton-2042023-katherine-macb.html
I watched this video of a public meeting, which I came across on the "World Doctors Alliance" group on the Telegram app, and thought it was a very helpful, constructive, non-threatening approach.
This lady did NONE of the "this is what I know that you ought to know" attitude that you find with 00DEZ, for example. She is merely offering help and support to help people with what they want to achieve, with the situational awareness that they already have.
The difficulty that people experience with the "you need to wake up to this" approach is that not everyone is in the same position, and some or many feel threatened and get either defensive, or aggressive, or dismiss things that conflict with how they understand the world currently.
The recognition that people need the help and co-operation of other like-minded people, on the other hand, is pretty universal.