27 Comments
Apr 13, 2023Liked by Matthew Ehret

Thank you for this uplifting piece! And Henry Wallace should have become President not only in 1948, but also in 1945 after FDR's death, but for some skullduggery that kept him from being VP candidate in 1944. Of course FDR shouldn't have died in 1945 either!

Expand full comment

I couldn’t disagree more:

FDR, Churchill & ‘Uncle Joe’ Stalin were the ‘axis of evil’ that Hitler and the deceptively demonized NSDAP, were the valiant vanguard against.

The same voracious Bolshevik cancer that is rapidly metastasizing and devouring the lives and liberties of the people of the world today.

Expand full comment

His son-in-law Col. Cutis Dall sure saw him differently. https://bit.ly/fdrwasowned

Expand full comment

Great article, good to focus on positive values. regarding Freedom Number Three here are some clear ways forward to end poverty and war:

https://www.einpresswire.com/article/626669871/trineday-publisher-announces-an-open-letter-to-king-charles-from-a-birthdate-soulmate

Expand full comment

FDR was complex. How do you justify his illegal embargo on Japanese oil imports (an act of siege warfare) that deliberately provoked the attack on Pearl Harbor, just as years of provocations resulted in Russia's SMO in Ukraine?

Expand full comment

the slide from the ideal has since been long alas, it is sliding further and i fear for our future

Expand full comment

FDR died from shot to the head, not cerebral hemorrhage, according to the following article with firsthand testimonies.

Suicide or Assassination?

http://spikethenewsa.blogspot.com/2013/07/who-killed-fdr-by-col-lfletcher-prouty.html

Expand full comment

Please do yo know what is the bolscevism? Marxism-Leninism (Bolshevism) ended with the death of Lenin, after which only revisionism of Marxism by petty bourgeois socialists whom Marx called Social-chauvinists. if you write about a "Fabian" left that has taken root in the states then I agree with you, but please don't confuse Bolshevism with Marxist revisionism. Thanks for the book I will try to read it but I already know what a history book written by a journalist can talk about. I prefer historians and honestly I've had enough of historical revisionism.

Expand full comment