On February 4, 2022, Presidents Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin unveiled a 5000 word ‘Joint Declaration on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development.’ The words “sustainable development” tied to “international relations” have obviously caused more than a few concerned citizens of western nations to gasp in fear that these two Eurasian powers who are apparently in a conflict with the unipolar death cultists managing the NATO cage, are in reality, simply controlled opposition.
Thanks Matthew ! The depth of your research is astounding and inspiring. Learning more about Maurice Strong was of interest. The collective West requires a much greater political maturity in order for the world to gain its essential equilibrium.
What Matt calls "nominalism" is nothing short of the destruction of language through conflation and redefinition, and the confusion and dumbing down of the populace so it can't even detect such "nominalism." It may well be that Putin and Xi mean something wildly different from the WEF in their use of "sustainable development," and Matt's review of Chinese infrastructure projects give ample evidence that Xi at least will no put up with a no-growth economic future.
However, their embrace of the scamdemic and "vaccines" in both Russia and China, along with Putin's status as a "Young Global Leader" should give us pause. There's no doubt that a multi-polar view based on cooperation among sovereign states and self-determination is preferable to the Western view of an authoritarian neo-feudal system of empire with vassal states. Mankind will soon find out the real intentions of Xi and Putin, but they can't be any worse than those of the globalists, and the West should definitely be focused on solving its own problems rather than projecting them onto Russia, China and Iran.
Never forget that Xi and Putin are dictators and China and Russia are totalitarian technocracies. Both Xi and Putin are all-in in support of Central Bank Digital Currencies, which includes Digital ID and Social Credit Score Systems to manipulate and control personal attitudes and behavior modification. Being in cahoots with the BRICS means adopting their monetary and currency platform.
The 24/7 relentless cycle of distraction , hysteria and debacles is deliberate and orchestrated to create an ebb and flow of extreme panic followed by a short hiatus of reassurance. Psychological torture and applied methodology of carrot and stick behavioral modification. Obedience without the realization you can say no. Would you ever have imagined a global population meekly masking its collective face, distancing from one another, willfully imprisoning itself, curled up in a fetal ball, waiting indefinitely to receive an experimental unsafe mRNA gene edited “ vaccine” for a “ novel” lab created virus, allow parents and loved ones to die alone , behind a shatterproof observation window.? With 80+ percent of the global populace worshipping at the altar of Faustus? The Messianic of Scientism, Jesus of the godless, but with better shoes.
Unlike the author, I think Russia and China are definitely still pushing for globalization. What has changed is that they don't want the US to be in charge of the NWO. They realize that together they have more power than the US and therefore they will be in charge. Neither China, Russia, or India are champions of freedom so even if this article has everything correct, the populations of the world are in for oppression on a large scale.
In conversations with doomer leaning friends I’m always talking about contra indicators, but the indicators still go both ways. Here Matt has put together a great collection, with graphs even, of white pill facts.
Still, technology itself will have it’s own over-arching say so and that must be a driving force for both factions. For me it leads towards ever increasing creepiness. No one is going to ban fire just as no one is going to ban AI. I don’t think some old school "balance of powers" notion is going to be sufficient to maintain humanity, there must be another element.
Great information thanks! You make great points throughout. A bit of balance is perhaps needed- China's insane Covid response- spraying the streets, spraying chickens, bolting people into their homes etc etc etc- no criticism? No push from them for ivermectin or HCQ?? Maybe a mention of those Chinese covid videos of people collapsing in the street? Who made those?
Why is there a declining birth rate? Is there a general depression of the Chinese such that they don't want children?
Social credit system? Face scanning to buy groceries? Is all that a lie? Would love o hear your take!
And I know this is but a small part of your argument but moon colonies and mining HE3 - please catch up- you are so up to speed everywhere else. No humans will be going to the moon - https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/
The way I understood this is, why would Russia and China and other EAEU Nations fall for a Narrative sold by the same Globalizers that had been sucking their Blood for hundreds of years like Lemmings going over the Cliff? It didn't make sense to me. They are going their own way and the Globalizers are going theirs.
Matthew is entirely right how the Western Bankster Parasites are Malthusian and are trying to tear down our industrial society, using the excuse of climate change to destroy our energy supply. Foisting the Wind & Solar Mega-Scam down our throats. Plus other worthless efforts: Hydrogen, Agrofuels, CCS, Biomass burning, Utility battery storage & CCS and of course ITER.
They are real tricky devils. Fusion was proceeding at a linear steady pace. Between 1970 & 1997 fusion power produced in experimental Tokamaks grew a trillionX. Steady progress. Then some major power (now who would that be?) decided the way to go is an International Cooperative giant effort to make a giganormous Tokamak in one country, instead of spirited competition between nations. The pinnacle of bureaucratic boondoggles. They spent 5yrs arguing about where to build it. $65B cost estimate now. Might finally start making plasma in 2025, maybe. And it was already obsolete from the first shovelful of dirt to build it.
Giant improvements in superconductors meant much smaller magnets could be used and much smaller, practical $million scale Tokamaks that will outperform the giant boondoggle, which is now all screwed up, because the myriad of international contractors manufactured components out of spec and they don't fit together properly. And other practical fusion methods like LPP Focus Fusion, General Fusion, Commercial Fusion Systems, Polywell fusion, Helion energy, Zap energy, Tokamak Energy, First Light Fusion, ARC fusion, TAE technologies, Lockheed Compact fusion, Tri-Alpha Energy are being build with trivial levels of funding compared to Wind, Solar/H2/Battery subsidies & ITER.
"ITER Is a Suicidal Plan That Would Discredit Nuclear Fusion, Scientist Says, Again, Ernesto Mazzucato"
"...A retired plasma physicist has given New Energy Times permission to republish critical letters he wrote about the ITER fusion reactor project many years ago. He has done this despite risks associated with publicly criticizing the international project.
Ernesto Mazzucato spent his entire career — from 1965 to 2014 — working at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory. Mazzucato continues to work on his own fusion concepts.
He told us about pressure from some of his peers from 1996 to 2006 when he openly criticized the ITER project, but he asked us to withhold those details for fear that it would interfere with his present access to resources and the ability to publish in peer-reviewed journals.
Mazzucato is the second retired fusion physicist from the Princeton laboratory with whom New Energy Times has spoken who is critical of ITER. The first was Mazzucato’s colleague, Daniel Jassby, who has been publishing critical articles about ITER on the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists Web site.
Jassby was the first scientist to provide New Energy Times with clear values for the ITER reactor power requirements, following our attempts to obtain this information directly from the ITER organization.
Mazzucato told New Energy Times that he “suffered dearly” shortly after Science magazine published his first critical comments in 1996.
“I knew that speaking out was risky, but I had to say what was on my mind,” Mazzucato said. “I thought that ITER would ruin fusion, and I had spent all my life working on fusion. ITER was the wrong track.”
Mazzucato told New Energy Times that, decades earlier, at the beginning of the discussions about the ITER concept, the conversation was purely about physics. The conversation soon shifted to the bait-and-switch scheme, as Nobel laureate Masatoshi Koshiba called it.
“The scientists were not talking about power production,” Mazzucato said, “but then slowly, the bureaucrats were put in charge of this project, and they started talking about a power gain, that ITER would produce 10 times more power than it would use.
“But none of the scientists said anything. We all knew that the power values only applied to the particles, not the overall reactor.”
These are the three letters Mazzucato provided: ..."
So as you would expect, once the ITER boondoggle started fusion progress has stalled from 1997 to present.
What does it mean when the BRICS bank cooperates with and supports Western sanctions on Russia? Would that support the "controlled opposition" hypothesis?
Nailed it, Matthew! I was doubting my own sanity. Now I fear being sane.
Absolutely phenomenal wow. Thank you!
Thanks Matthew ! The depth of your research is astounding and inspiring. Learning more about Maurice Strong was of interest. The collective West requires a much greater political maturity in order for the world to gain its essential equilibrium.
What Matt calls "nominalism" is nothing short of the destruction of language through conflation and redefinition, and the confusion and dumbing down of the populace so it can't even detect such "nominalism." It may well be that Putin and Xi mean something wildly different from the WEF in their use of "sustainable development," and Matt's review of Chinese infrastructure projects give ample evidence that Xi at least will no put up with a no-growth economic future.
However, their embrace of the scamdemic and "vaccines" in both Russia and China, along with Putin's status as a "Young Global Leader" should give us pause. There's no doubt that a multi-polar view based on cooperation among sovereign states and self-determination is preferable to the Western view of an authoritarian neo-feudal system of empire with vassal states. Mankind will soon find out the real intentions of Xi and Putin, but they can't be any worse than those of the globalists, and the West should definitely be focused on solving its own problems rather than projecting them onto Russia, China and Iran.
Never forget that Xi and Putin are dictators and China and Russia are totalitarian technocracies. Both Xi and Putin are all-in in support of Central Bank Digital Currencies, which includes Digital ID and Social Credit Score Systems to manipulate and control personal attitudes and behavior modification. Being in cahoots with the BRICS means adopting their monetary and currency platform.
If earth's temperature rises the atmosphere hold more water vapour. Proper tree planting and farming can encourage it to rain out more.
https://dea.org.au/greening-the-desert-how-farmers-in-sahel-confound-scientists-healthy-planet-healthy-people-dea/
The 24/7 relentless cycle of distraction , hysteria and debacles is deliberate and orchestrated to create an ebb and flow of extreme panic followed by a short hiatus of reassurance. Psychological torture and applied methodology of carrot and stick behavioral modification. Obedience without the realization you can say no. Would you ever have imagined a global population meekly masking its collective face, distancing from one another, willfully imprisoning itself, curled up in a fetal ball, waiting indefinitely to receive an experimental unsafe mRNA gene edited “ vaccine” for a “ novel” lab created virus, allow parents and loved ones to die alone , behind a shatterproof observation window.? With 80+ percent of the global populace worshipping at the altar of Faustus? The Messianic of Scientism, Jesus of the godless, but with better shoes.
Unlike the author, I think Russia and China are definitely still pushing for globalization. What has changed is that they don't want the US to be in charge of the NWO. They realize that together they have more power than the US and therefore they will be in charge. Neither China, Russia, or India are champions of freedom so even if this article has everything correct, the populations of the world are in for oppression on a large scale.
In conversations with doomer leaning friends I’m always talking about contra indicators, but the indicators still go both ways. Here Matt has put together a great collection, with graphs even, of white pill facts.
Still, technology itself will have it’s own over-arching say so and that must be a driving force for both factions. For me it leads towards ever increasing creepiness. No one is going to ban fire just as no one is going to ban AI. I don’t think some old school "balance of powers" notion is going to be sufficient to maintain humanity, there must be another element.
Great information thanks! You make great points throughout. A bit of balance is perhaps needed- China's insane Covid response- spraying the streets, spraying chickens, bolting people into their homes etc etc etc- no criticism? No push from them for ivermectin or HCQ?? Maybe a mention of those Chinese covid videos of people collapsing in the street? Who made those?
Why is there a declining birth rate? Is there a general depression of the Chinese such that they don't want children?
Social credit system? Face scanning to buy groceries? Is all that a lie? Would love o hear your take!
And I know this is but a small part of your argument but moon colonies and mining HE3 - please catch up- you are so up to speed everywhere else. No humans will be going to the moon - https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/
thank you
The way I understood this is, why would Russia and China and other EAEU Nations fall for a Narrative sold by the same Globalizers that had been sucking their Blood for hundreds of years like Lemmings going over the Cliff? It didn't make sense to me. They are going their own way and the Globalizers are going theirs.
Matthew is entirely right how the Western Bankster Parasites are Malthusian and are trying to tear down our industrial society, using the excuse of climate change to destroy our energy supply. Foisting the Wind & Solar Mega-Scam down our throats. Plus other worthless efforts: Hydrogen, Agrofuels, CCS, Biomass burning, Utility battery storage & CCS and of course ITER.
They are real tricky devils. Fusion was proceeding at a linear steady pace. Between 1970 & 1997 fusion power produced in experimental Tokamaks grew a trillionX. Steady progress. Then some major power (now who would that be?) decided the way to go is an International Cooperative giant effort to make a giganormous Tokamak in one country, instead of spirited competition between nations. The pinnacle of bureaucratic boondoggles. They spent 5yrs arguing about where to build it. $65B cost estimate now. Might finally start making plasma in 2025, maybe. And it was already obsolete from the first shovelful of dirt to build it.
Giant improvements in superconductors meant much smaller magnets could be used and much smaller, practical $million scale Tokamaks that will outperform the giant boondoggle, which is now all screwed up, because the myriad of international contractors manufactured components out of spec and they don't fit together properly. And other practical fusion methods like LPP Focus Fusion, General Fusion, Commercial Fusion Systems, Polywell fusion, Helion energy, Zap energy, Tokamak Energy, First Light Fusion, ARC fusion, TAE technologies, Lockheed Compact fusion, Tri-Alpha Energy are being build with trivial levels of funding compared to Wind, Solar/H2/Battery subsidies & ITER.
news.newenergytimes.net/2020/12/05/iter-is-a-suicidal-plan-that-would-discredit-nuclear-fusion/
"ITER Is a Suicidal Plan That Would Discredit Nuclear Fusion, Scientist Says, Again, Ernesto Mazzucato"
"...A retired plasma physicist has given New Energy Times permission to republish critical letters he wrote about the ITER fusion reactor project many years ago. He has done this despite risks associated with publicly criticizing the international project.
Ernesto Mazzucato spent his entire career — from 1965 to 2014 — working at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory. Mazzucato continues to work on his own fusion concepts.
He told us about pressure from some of his peers from 1996 to 2006 when he openly criticized the ITER project, but he asked us to withhold those details for fear that it would interfere with his present access to resources and the ability to publish in peer-reviewed journals.
Mazzucato is the second retired fusion physicist from the Princeton laboratory with whom New Energy Times has spoken who is critical of ITER. The first was Mazzucato’s colleague, Daniel Jassby, who has been publishing critical articles about ITER on the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists Web site.
Jassby was the first scientist to provide New Energy Times with clear values for the ITER reactor power requirements, following our attempts to obtain this information directly from the ITER organization.
Mazzucato told New Energy Times that he “suffered dearly” shortly after Science magazine published his first critical comments in 1996.
“I knew that speaking out was risky, but I had to say what was on my mind,” Mazzucato said. “I thought that ITER would ruin fusion, and I had spent all my life working on fusion. ITER was the wrong track.”
Mazzucato told New Energy Times that, decades earlier, at the beginning of the discussions about the ITER concept, the conversation was purely about physics. The conversation soon shifted to the bait-and-switch scheme, as Nobel laureate Masatoshi Koshiba called it.
“The scientists were not talking about power production,” Mazzucato said, “but then slowly, the bureaucrats were put in charge of this project, and they started talking about a power gain, that ITER would produce 10 times more power than it would use.
“But none of the scientists said anything. We all knew that the power values only applied to the particles, not the overall reactor.”
These are the three letters Mazzucato provided: ..."
So as you would expect, once the ITER boondoggle started fusion progress has stalled from 1997 to present.
This question has been building in me and I am so grateful you pre-empted an explorative discussion on this topic... more to come??? :)
What does it mean when the BRICS bank cooperates with and supports Western sanctions on Russia? Would that support the "controlled opposition" hypothesis?