Yes yes yes, Steven! Thank the gods that someone else is willing to call out St. Fitts. Dr. Mercola is completely taken in by Fitts, and therefore Robert Malone and others. At one point I went to one of her financial planning seminars, which is how she supports herself, and her big plan came down to gold, gold, gold, and some cute little green entrepreneurs. I tried to pitch my ideas to her (it was before my book was finished) and I found her grasp of economics very superficial. She does have a HUGE following and no new ideas. I have another episode critiquing The Greater Reset, which may be another faux-Resistance we agree on. But it does my heart good to hear someone else dissing the Fitts. I think I'm more critical of her in the video than I went into in the text, if you're reading but not watching. Like the Greater Reset, I agree with her goals but her means will never get there.
"... that same republican spirit of 1789 which animated Jean-Sylvain Bailly, Benjamin Franklin and Marquis Lafayette "
The fact that they were all Freemasons cannot be a coincidence. If you consider the work of another member of the Jacobin Club, Anacharsis Cloots, his "République Universelle" gives you a clear view of the forces behind the French revolution. With hindsight, we can observe that Freemasonry has been focused on the same project from the French Revolution to Agenda 2030.
And then why did evil Freemason Bailly get his head cut off by operations run by evil freemasons while evil freemason Lafayette rotted in an Austrian dungeon for 5 years under the control of evil freemasons? Could it be that you might be oversimplifying things a bit much?
Putting them all in the same evil bag is also reductive, but the fact is that "Hell" has always been divided against itself. The author of the "République Universelle" was also guillotined and Robespierre underwent the same fate. Closer to us, remember the rivalry between Lenin and Trotsky and, later, the way the confrontation between Trotsky and Stalin ended. However, all the Bolshevik actors were financed though the same source and had the same masters.
Wow. Just wow. Another preconception bites the dust.
I had been writing, on other threads, that Jacobin magazine had betrayed its principles but now I see that it's been true to its capitalist origins. This story of getting the masses to agitate for merchant-banker rule is very prescient. It could be Fauci, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab. Only the rich can save us.
I'd been a fan of Robespierre based on his speech that the French revolution needed to free the Haitian slaves. I saw the keeping of the slaves (an investment in which every Frenchman participated, much like today) as the failure of the French Revolution. But I see it went much deeper.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man is beautifully written particularly in its definition of liberty. I went back and looked at the original Articles of Confederation and they don't measure up. I know that Ben Franklin based something on the Iroquois Confederacy but it clearly isn't this nor is it the Constitution. Do you know, Matt?
You are playing fast and loose with the term "capitalist" just like most people do with the term "Marxist". For starters, the presence of a central bank is anticapitalist by nature. Can you name a single free market capitalist that supports the central bank? How is " too big to fail" a capitalist philosophy? I interpret the writing as an example of criminal subversion more than the natural result of a particular economic philosophy breaking down.
I also believe in defining terms so I'm glad you're asking for that. I define capitalism as a system that favors the accumulation of capital. Capital is ownership of the assets that back the money. We live in banker capitalism, where they're the default owner of the houses that back the mortgages which create the money. If the community was the default owner of the capital that backed the money, namely the houses and assets, accumulation would be a good thing, it would add to the community's wealth. So I don't see capitalism as good or bad because it depends on whether it's serving the many or a few at the expense of the many.
Oh Steven, you're speaking my language! I have a YT video that I'd almost linked in my post above called Need, Greed & the 3P. It talks about Marxism as a system that rewards need, capitalism as a system that rewards greed, and the third paradigm being a system of reciprocity--which no one talks about.
I think that in a well-designed system, it doesn't matter who's in charge because the harm a bad leader can do temporary and reversible, and the progress of a good leader is permanent. You might like my most recent episode, Home is Where the Hearth Is. It talks about Michael Hudson's FIRE economy and how all ways that money is made from money should belong to the community and all ways money is made from labor should belong to the individual.
Very interesting critique. I guess the non-UFO parts that she puts in to sound smart and credible, in your analysis, are the places where I think she's superficial and illogical. If she actually made sense in her economic plan, I might be willing to entertain the UFOs. But I think that in both cases she's someone who rose to stardom by saying enough of the right things at the right time (and defecting from a high profile gov't position to give her street cred) that no one's looking very closely at her positions. Glad you're on top of it!
Thank you Matt, your lectures are interesting and informative, at this present time, people are living in different levels of consciousness, there are those who live in reality, experts in their own fields of scientific knowledge and many other people in different fields including religion, then there are those who are living in virtual reality, who are conspirators of scientific knowledge and many other fields of knowledge.
Apparently the ceremony for CERN's Hadron Collider in Switzerland is what many have described as demonic, looking for God's Spark they have stumbled on the exact opposite, Stephen Hawking said, ' God Particle' could wipe out the Universe ?
My quick test for deciding whether or not any particular country is part of the Mr Global agenda is to simply look at their banking models and ownership structure.
China's banking models, from Central Bank level right down to local transactional entities, are all based on state and cooperative ownership. Nothing pisses Mr Global off more than this... especially when all of their infrastructure costs come in at between half and one third the price of what similar projects would cost in the West.
This is the gorilla in the room... there are no thieving parasitic private banking cabal's in this system and money is not created as debt... this system allows a country to develop and increase it's money supply without it being in the least bit inflationary.
Similarly do you not think that the U$ having 800 overseas military bases as opposed to China's 1.5 is a wee hint that things have gone horribly wrong?... one is in Djibouti and the 0.5 is a joint venture in the Cambodian Ream naval base.
As such the U$ has 533 times the number of overseas military bases. Don't even get me started on their utterly obscene military budget which is normally roughly equivalent to the next 9-10 largest military countries spending combined.
Unlike the Zone A system, which is simply neo-feudalism/reverse-socialism dressed up as capitalism, this formula builds a real and tangible economy and a much healthier brand of GDP. This is the exact opposite of the western FIRE system... it actually creates real long term wealth and productivity for society rather than simply blowing massive asset bubbles and encouraging casino-like behaviour in the financial community.
If GDP is worked out properly [not by the UN, IMF, or WB] the PPP GDP of China achieved parity with the US way back in 2014. Mainstreet is not supposed to know about this... 99% of us don't have single a clue. The US is now a very distant 2nd at $20 trillion with China's GDP around $30 trillion.
This is the reason why the West is intent on destroying any other development inititiatives globally. Mr Global controls Natostan and the West and the privately owned banking cabal holds a large portion of the globe to ransom.
This construct is nothing more than a blood sucking parasite. In essence the the private banking cabal is the printing press that keeps perpetual war and at least 90% of global terrorism ticking over.
And maybe I should remind you of what even the truly horrible Mr Kissinger stated...
“America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests”
... and...
“To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”
By the way, I am 67 years old and I have not lived a single year in my entire life where the U$ is not at war with at least one country. Of course this behaviour is not limited to the US but goes back to hundreds of years of banker's wars, and particularly to Britain, Threadneedle Street and the old European family wealth.
Clearly, Mr Global's agenda completely transcends sovereign boundaries, but the U$ and its Natostan buddies form the rampant and ever persistent attack dog pack.
Perhaps this statement from Putin will help you with your "confusion"...
“Only sovereign states can effectively respond to the challenges of the times and the demands of the citizens. Accordingly, any effective international order should take into account the interests and capabilities of the state and proceed on that basis, and not try to prove that they should not exist. Furthermore, it is impossible to impose anything on anyone, be it the principles underlying the sociopolitical structure or values that someone, for their own reasons, has called “universal”. After all, it is clear that when a real crisis strikes, there is only one universal value left and that is human life, which each state decides for itself how best to protect based on its abilities, culture and traditions.”
And your completely irresponsible advice to "ignore the various banking systems"... well, best of luck with that strategy... in fact that is precisely the reason why the FED model has persisted for 109 years and turned much of the world economy into a cross between a gambling casino and a killing field.
You appear to have absolutely no clue whatsoever that neither Russia nor China are communist states any longer.
I really can't be bothered any longer with this discussion when you are so totally out of touch with reality... I have far better things to do with my time
In the mean time I suggest you read up on Mathews latest piece and try to get up to speed... the last paragraph really does say it all...
"Although geopolitical storms continue to intensify, it is increasingly clear that only the multipolar ship of state has demonstrated the competence to navigate the hostile seas, while the sinking unipolar ship of fools has a ruptured hull held together by little more than chewing gum and heavy doses of delusion."
And maybe there remains a faint glimmer of hope that you might just eventually [hopefully before 2031 anyway] twig that Putin absolutely does not carry water for Mr Global.
I can only assume you are of the impression that China must still be technically communist because of the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] being named as such.
Using this logic I assume you regard the US Democrats as being thoroughly and wonderfully democratic... wait for it... simply because of the name!
Just my opinion, but the one and only 'shill' on this comment string is the writer of this complete and utter sinophobic nonsense...
"Further, and more specifically, how can anyone construe "China’s Belt and Road Initiative" as anything more noble than a grand scheme to build more Globalist (crypto-neoliberal) Infrastructure?"
The BRI initiatives actually spell the nemesis of Mr Global and his private banking cabal's reset plan. It will scuttle Natostan's desperate last ditch attempt to hold on to financial and military hegemony.
You said... "Please aim for accuracy in your attacks".
If you read my short post I did not say it was China that was doing the scuttling... I said it was the collective BRI initiatives achieving this. By the way this group now has the support of ~90% of the world's population and they challenge every aspect of the outgoing military and financial hegemony's existence.
Well done Natostan... the boomerang you threw came back and hit you right between the eyes.
You also seem very confused about China's Social Credit system and apparently assume that just because Mr Global would like to implement this system, then that dictates that China is a willing partner.
The fact is it is simply a model that exists in China and Mr Global sees it as a very useful tool they can copy. This has zero to do with China being on board and everything to do with them simply highjacking an idea.
And talk about the pot calling the kettle black after your ridiculous attack on Mathew's article.
You make great points about China that are pretty clear to many. Not sure why you get triggered about how often someone uses a comma since comma usage has a degree of subjectivity. I had zero problem understanding the writing. That part just makes you seem petty, aloof, and disingenuous because nothing about that part of the writing or the way you attacked it was constructive the way you commented about China.
OK boomer. Try punching up. You wasting everyone's time. You snooty AF. Ya feel me bra?!? Probably not since you can't read if you don't like where people put commas. Lol. Not the sharpest tool in the shed, eh?!? You hide behind your self proclaimed mastery of the English language built by the very system you pretend to fight against and if someone breaks your "rule" you get triggered. Its not a high standard so much as an insecurity. Cognitive dissonance much?
Yes Nic... I know exactly what you mean... sometimes it can be extremely challenging to know what is actually behind such arrogance.
Is it insecurity, blatant trolling, shilling, or just a simple case of terminal cognitive dissonance... who knows, perhaps it's an unfortunate blend of all of these conditions.
He talks down to me like I am some sort of precocious half-witted teenager... I am actually a semi-retired 67yo with more than 20,000 hours of geopolitical studies under my belt.
God, I, just, hope, I, haven'"t, misplaced, any, commas,!
Yes yes yes, Steven! Thank the gods that someone else is willing to call out St. Fitts. Dr. Mercola is completely taken in by Fitts, and therefore Robert Malone and others. At one point I went to one of her financial planning seminars, which is how she supports herself, and her big plan came down to gold, gold, gold, and some cute little green entrepreneurs. I tried to pitch my ideas to her (it was before my book was finished) and I found her grasp of economics very superficial. She does have a HUGE following and no new ideas. I have another episode critiquing The Greater Reset, which may be another faux-Resistance we agree on. But it does my heart good to hear someone else dissing the Fitts. I think I'm more critical of her in the video than I went into in the text, if you're reading but not watching. Like the Greater Reset, I agree with her goals but her means will never get there.
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/what-is-the-greater-reset
"... that same republican spirit of 1789 which animated Jean-Sylvain Bailly, Benjamin Franklin and Marquis Lafayette "
The fact that they were all Freemasons cannot be a coincidence. If you consider the work of another member of the Jacobin Club, Anacharsis Cloots, his "République Universelle" gives you a clear view of the forces behind the French revolution. With hindsight, we can observe that Freemasonry has been focused on the same project from the French Revolution to Agenda 2030.
And then why did evil Freemason Bailly get his head cut off by operations run by evil freemasons while evil freemason Lafayette rotted in an Austrian dungeon for 5 years under the control of evil freemasons? Could it be that you might be oversimplifying things a bit much?
Putting them all in the same evil bag is also reductive, but the fact is that "Hell" has always been divided against itself. The author of the "République Universelle" was also guillotined and Robespierre underwent the same fate. Closer to us, remember the rivalry between Lenin and Trotsky and, later, the way the confrontation between Trotsky and Stalin ended. However, all the Bolshevik actors were financed though the same source and had the same masters.
Wow. Just wow. Another preconception bites the dust.
I had been writing, on other threads, that Jacobin magazine had betrayed its principles but now I see that it's been true to its capitalist origins. This story of getting the masses to agitate for merchant-banker rule is very prescient. It could be Fauci, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab. Only the rich can save us.
I'd been a fan of Robespierre based on his speech that the French revolution needed to free the Haitian slaves. I saw the keeping of the slaves (an investment in which every Frenchman participated, much like today) as the failure of the French Revolution. But I see it went much deeper.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man is beautifully written particularly in its definition of liberty. I went back and looked at the original Articles of Confederation and they don't measure up. I know that Ben Franklin based something on the Iroquois Confederacy but it clearly isn't this nor is it the Constitution. Do you know, Matt?
Thanks for all this insight!
You are playing fast and loose with the term "capitalist" just like most people do with the term "Marxist". For starters, the presence of a central bank is anticapitalist by nature. Can you name a single free market capitalist that supports the central bank? How is " too big to fail" a capitalist philosophy? I interpret the writing as an example of criminal subversion more than the natural result of a particular economic philosophy breaking down.
I also believe in defining terms so I'm glad you're asking for that. I define capitalism as a system that favors the accumulation of capital. Capital is ownership of the assets that back the money. We live in banker capitalism, where they're the default owner of the houses that back the mortgages which create the money. If the community was the default owner of the capital that backed the money, namely the houses and assets, accumulation would be a good thing, it would add to the community's wealth. So I don't see capitalism as good or bad because it depends on whether it's serving the many or a few at the expense of the many.
Oh Steven, you're speaking my language! I have a YT video that I'd almost linked in my post above called Need, Greed & the 3P. It talks about Marxism as a system that rewards need, capitalism as a system that rewards greed, and the third paradigm being a system of reciprocity--which no one talks about.
I think that in a well-designed system, it doesn't matter who's in charge because the harm a bad leader can do temporary and reversible, and the progress of a good leader is permanent. You might like my most recent episode, Home is Where the Hearth Is. It talks about Michael Hudson's FIRE economy and how all ways that money is made from money should belong to the community and all ways money is made from labor should belong to the individual.
Need Greed & the 3P: https://youtu.be/6Qu5zCxafWU
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/home-is-where-the-hearth-is
Very interesting critique. I guess the non-UFO parts that she puts in to sound smart and credible, in your analysis, are the places where I think she's superficial and illogical. If she actually made sense in her economic plan, I might be willing to entertain the UFOs. But I think that in both cases she's someone who rose to stardom by saying enough of the right things at the right time (and defecting from a high profile gov't position to give her street cred) that no one's looking very closely at her positions. Glad you're on top of it!
Thank you Matt, your lectures are interesting and informative, at this present time, people are living in different levels of consciousness, there are those who live in reality, experts in their own fields of scientific knowledge and many other people in different fields including religion, then there are those who are living in virtual reality, who are conspirators of scientific knowledge and many other fields of knowledge.
Apparently the ceremony for CERN's Hadron Collider in Switzerland is what many have described as demonic, looking for God's Spark they have stumbled on the exact opposite, Stephen Hawking said, ' God Particle' could wipe out the Universe ?
My quick test for deciding whether or not any particular country is part of the Mr Global agenda is to simply look at their banking models and ownership structure.
China's banking models, from Central Bank level right down to local transactional entities, are all based on state and cooperative ownership. Nothing pisses Mr Global off more than this... especially when all of their infrastructure costs come in at between half and one third the price of what similar projects would cost in the West.
This is the gorilla in the room... there are no thieving parasitic private banking cabal's in this system and money is not created as debt... this system allows a country to develop and increase it's money supply without it being in the least bit inflationary.
Similarly do you not think that the U$ having 800 overseas military bases as opposed to China's 1.5 is a wee hint that things have gone horribly wrong?... one is in Djibouti and the 0.5 is a joint venture in the Cambodian Ream naval base.
As such the U$ has 533 times the number of overseas military bases. Don't even get me started on their utterly obscene military budget which is normally roughly equivalent to the next 9-10 largest military countries spending combined.
Unlike the Zone A system, which is simply neo-feudalism/reverse-socialism dressed up as capitalism, this formula builds a real and tangible economy and a much healthier brand of GDP. This is the exact opposite of the western FIRE system... it actually creates real long term wealth and productivity for society rather than simply blowing massive asset bubbles and encouraging casino-like behaviour in the financial community.
If GDP is worked out properly [not by the UN, IMF, or WB] the PPP GDP of China achieved parity with the US way back in 2014. Mainstreet is not supposed to know about this... 99% of us don't have single a clue. The US is now a very distant 2nd at $20 trillion with China's GDP around $30 trillion.
This is the reason why the West is intent on destroying any other development inititiatives globally. Mr Global controls Natostan and the West and the privately owned banking cabal holds a large portion of the globe to ransom.
This construct is nothing more than a blood sucking parasite. In essence the the private banking cabal is the printing press that keeps perpetual war and at least 90% of global terrorism ticking over.
And maybe I should remind you of what even the truly horrible Mr Kissinger stated...
“America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests”
... and...
“To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”
By the way, I am 67 years old and I have not lived a single year in my entire life where the U$ is not at war with at least one country. Of course this behaviour is not limited to the US but goes back to hundreds of years of banker's wars, and particularly to Britain, Threadneedle Street and the old European family wealth.
Clearly, Mr Global's agenda completely transcends sovereign boundaries, but the U$ and its Natostan buddies form the rampant and ever persistent attack dog pack.
Perhaps this statement from Putin will help you with your "confusion"...
“Only sovereign states can effectively respond to the challenges of the times and the demands of the citizens. Accordingly, any effective international order should take into account the interests and capabilities of the state and proceed on that basis, and not try to prove that they should not exist. Furthermore, it is impossible to impose anything on anyone, be it the principles underlying the sociopolitical structure or values that someone, for their own reasons, has called “universal”. After all, it is clear that when a real crisis strikes, there is only one universal value left and that is human life, which each state decides for itself how best to protect based on its abilities, culture and traditions.”
And your completely irresponsible advice to "ignore the various banking systems"... well, best of luck with that strategy... in fact that is precisely the reason why the FED model has persisted for 109 years and turned much of the world economy into a cross between a gambling casino and a killing field.
You appear to have absolutely no clue whatsoever that neither Russia nor China are communist states any longer.
I really can't be bothered any longer with this discussion when you are so totally out of touch with reality... I have far better things to do with my time
In the mean time I suggest you read up on Mathews latest piece and try to get up to speed... the last paragraph really does say it all...
"Although geopolitical storms continue to intensify, it is increasingly clear that only the multipolar ship of state has demonstrated the competence to navigate the hostile seas, while the sinking unipolar ship of fools has a ruptured hull held together by little more than chewing gum and heavy doses of delusion."
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/india-russia-iran-eurasias-new-transportation
And maybe there remains a faint glimmer of hope that you might just eventually [hopefully before 2031 anyway] twig that Putin absolutely does not carry water for Mr Global.
I can only assume you are of the impression that China must still be technically communist because of the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] being named as such.
Using this logic I assume you regard the US Democrats as being thoroughly and wonderfully democratic... wait for it... simply because of the name!
Just my opinion, but the one and only 'shill' on this comment string is the writer of this complete and utter sinophobic nonsense...
"Further, and more specifically, how can anyone construe "China’s Belt and Road Initiative" as anything more noble than a grand scheme to build more Globalist (crypto-neoliberal) Infrastructure?"
The BRI initiatives actually spell the nemesis of Mr Global and his private banking cabal's reset plan. It will scuttle Natostan's desperate last ditch attempt to hold on to financial and military hegemony.
BTW I hope I got my commas exactly right... sigh!
You said... "Please aim for accuracy in your attacks".
If you read my short post I did not say it was China that was doing the scuttling... I said it was the collective BRI initiatives achieving this. By the way this group now has the support of ~90% of the world's population and they challenge every aspect of the outgoing military and financial hegemony's existence.
Well done Natostan... the boomerang you threw came back and hit you right between the eyes.
You also seem very confused about China's Social Credit system and apparently assume that just because Mr Global would like to implement this system, then that dictates that China is a willing partner.
The fact is it is simply a model that exists in China and Mr Global sees it as a very useful tool they can copy. This has zero to do with China being on board and everything to do with them simply highjacking an idea.
And talk about the pot calling the kettle black after your ridiculous attack on Mathew's article.
You make great points about China that are pretty clear to many. Not sure why you get triggered about how often someone uses a comma since comma usage has a degree of subjectivity. I had zero problem understanding the writing. That part just makes you seem petty, aloof, and disingenuous because nothing about that part of the writing or the way you attacked it was constructive the way you commented about China.
You take the fight seriously with pretention and comma correctness. Way to fight the good fight
OK boomer. Try punching up. You wasting everyone's time. You snooty AF. Ya feel me bra?!? Probably not since you can't read if you don't like where people put commas. Lol. Not the sharpest tool in the shed, eh?!? You hide behind your self proclaimed mastery of the English language built by the very system you pretend to fight against and if someone breaks your "rule" you get triggered. Its not a high standard so much as an insecurity. Cognitive dissonance much?
Yes Nic... I know exactly what you mean... sometimes it can be extremely challenging to know what is actually behind such arrogance.
Is it insecurity, blatant trolling, shilling, or just a simple case of terminal cognitive dissonance... who knows, perhaps it's an unfortunate blend of all of these conditions.
He talks down to me like I am some sort of precocious half-witted teenager... I am actually a semi-retired 67yo with more than 20,000 hours of geopolitical studies under my belt.
God, I, just, hope, I, haven'"t, misplaced, any, commas,!
Cheers
Col