The rampant anti-Chinese (and Russian) bias pervasive in today’s society has a lot to do with the fact that people have been conditioned by a very messy world outlook known as “cultural relativism”. While attractive on the surface due to its promotion of “respect and toleration” for other cultures on the one hand and its condemnation of imperialism on the other, an ugly paradox sits below the surface of such ideology which ironically facilitates modern imperialism’s grip on the world. The paradox is most easily seen by exposing the core assumption of reasoning that lay at the foundation of all cultural relativist theory which follows:
Even with a 'proof', it wouldn’t really expand the universe, but really enclose it. For centuries the value zero was undefined the same way that some people leave the middle letter out of the word 'God' or the word 'sex'.
Perhaps not the mathematicians themselves, but rather the source of their funding, wish to accomplish the same result as the funding of Darwin accomplished. A further proof that the extermination of millions of innocent lives in the last 200 years was not only necessary, but also needs to be extended.
As is the case with this theorem? Conjecture?
https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-many-numbers-exist-infinity-proof-moves-math-closer-to-an-answer-20210715/?utm_source=Nature+Briefing&utm_campaign=e216fc5915-briefing-dy-20210716&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c9dfd39373-e216fc5915-44609909
Even with a 'proof', it wouldn’t really expand the universe, but really enclose it. For centuries the value zero was undefined the same way that some people leave the middle letter out of the word 'God' or the word 'sex'.
Perhaps not the mathematicians themselves, but rather the source of their funding, wish to accomplish the same result as the funding of Darwin accomplished. A further proof that the extermination of millions of innocent lives in the last 200 years was not only necessary, but also needs to be extended.