The Fabian Society, Eugenics and the Historic Forces Behind Today’s Systemic Breakdown
matthewehret.substack.com
The financial system is clearly careening towards a point of dissolution. It isn’t an exaggeration to say that the collapse itself has already happened and we simply have not yet felt the full brutal force of the shockwave accelerating toward us. This process is comparable to a tectonic snap deep in the crust under the ocean. The snap happens and a tsunami has begun. It will hit the beach front with devastating consequences and only by breaking the habit of living in the myopic “moment” might those on the beach have a chance to get to safer ground before it is too late.
Thanks Matthew. As someone who has only recently woken up to the utter lunacy of the global financial corruption, I am grateful for the insights you produce in your excellent essays, well supported by historical evidence. My problem is that it seems only too apparent that humanity has, like me, woken up far far too late to prevent the tsunami of chaos now heading our way and I feel a desperation on behalf of my children who will inherit the world controlled by the likes of the WEF.
Thanks for using 'Biden's handlers' instead of 'Biden'. Could we do this for all our politicians? Bush's handlers, Obama's handlers, Merkel's handlers, Johnson's handlers, and yes, take a deep breath....Trump's handlers too.
Mathew, thank you for this informative essay. My introduction to your work. I look forward to devouring the rest of your substack. Whilst I largely agree with your historical analysis of the machinations and motives behind the global control grid, I question the implied narrative that the Russia/China axis is standing up for a nation state model and somehow fighting the NWO. Their joint statement is littered with NWO buzzwords and could be straight out of Davos. Multipolarity, yadda, yadda. At best this can be viewed as jockeying for position within an accepted and agreed upon technocratic vision for the post petrodollar world. Keywords and phrases: sustainable development, economic globalization, transformation of the global governance architecture and world order, universal human values as peace, development, equality, justice and democracy, to protect the United Nations-driven international architecture and the international law-based world order.
Absurdly, they talk of understanding that democracy is a universal human value, rather than a privilege. Their long-standing traditions of democracy. They ‘oppose the abuse of democratic values and interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states under the pretext of protecting democracy and human rights.’ Laughable. China, democracy within our totalitarian surveillance states. ‘Promotion and protection of human rights is a shared responsibility of the international community.’ Even more laughable. Genocide, that well known tool used to ‘protect human rights’?
Obligatory mention of 2030 sustainable development goals. Yeah, yeah. Sounds noble - poverty reduction, food security, vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity. Read global biosecurity state (multipolar of course) and social credit system.
The ‘harmonious development of humankind’. Sure, they’re all about this. The ‘protection of life and health of the population’. Read transhumanism and Human Genome Project. ‘Increase cooperation in the development and manufacture of vaccines against the new coronavirus infection’. Well of course. ‘implementing quarantine measures in the border areas and ensuring the stable operation of the border crossing points, and intend to consider establishing a joint mechanism for epidemic control’. We all know the true intention here is epidemic control. Nothing else to see. Here’s another comedy nugget - ‘The Russian side welcomes the work carried out jointly by China and WHO to identify the source of the new coronavirus infection and supports the China – WHO joint report on the matter.’
And to turn the irony meter up to 11 - ‘The sides condemn terrorism in all its manifestations’. Those peace loving cuddly bunnies. I guess if you redefine terrorism as per vaccine, epidemic etc the skies the limit. I do like their not so subtle dig at the Yanks ‘condemn the practice of interference in the internal affairs of other States for geopolitical purposes through the use of terrorist and extremist groups as well as under the guise of combating international terrorism and extremism.’ And the prescient talk/warning of NATO expansion and bioweapons threat.
And so it goes on. Veiled threats aside, pretence that the nation state/multipolar model is alive and well, this could have been penned by one of Schwab’s lackeys. And almost certainly was. Xi and Putin’s tied to WEF and Young Leaders Programme are hardly a secret. The Russian hacking/cybersecurity false flags exposed by their heavy involvement in Cyber Polygon. This is one big club and we’re not in it.
Matthew, Another lucid, if somewhat unsettling summation of the backstory of “how did we get here”. Does much to explain the complexities of our current malaise, not least the twisted rationale underpinning the Great Eugenocide which we are experiencing, which so many still simply do not — or do not want to — get. Thank you for this.
Wells' arguments are as feeble as any other pseudo-intellectual who fancies himself a philosopher.
"These were simply: 1) human nature was intrinsically absurd, selfish and incapable of resolving the duty-freedom paradox in any believable manner, 2) science and technology would thus always be used towards selfish and destructive ends, 3) world government is the only salvation for humanity."
His conclusion (3) rests upon the idea that those implementing and operating the world government are somehow immune to both (1) and (2). Somehow, in a manner never properly explained, "science and technology" are supposed to provide the answer to this. Yes, science and technology will always be used towards selfish and destructive ends - as shown by their use in implementing a world government!
Wells was a creative mind and a wonderful storyteller, but sadly, he was a hack as a philosopher.
Brilliant piece. Thank you. It has given me much needed hope. It still shocks me how the changes in the last couple of years have meant that any discord with the mainstream narrative has been hailed as Russian propaganda or that somehow someone is suddenly “far-right”? We are forced to whisper in corridors that Russia is doing better than us - 14% debt to GDP vs. Ludicrously unplayable debts here in the UK, Europe and the US! Somehow the mention of that and we are the enemy. I’m using the word we as it’s great to read a piece that has demonstrated my feelings about Russia/China were not wrong!
Daniels vision about two kings, north and south@ 11:26 Concerning the King of the South "those eating his delicacies will cause his downfall". vs27 "Regards these two kings they will sit at the table telling lies to each other". They sound awfully like 'The clash of two systems'?
Very timely and good article. Helped clarify why I think Russia is the good guy in all of this (ie for the vast masses of people and the ideals which we in the US have instilled in us...peoples in charge of their own destiny, and the worth of the nation-state).
I have been warning people for years about the Fabian Society. Really good article.
Excellent service and please, send emails to deborahrevans237@yahoo.com. having many issues with Google! Thank you.
Kindest regards,
Deborah R. Evans
Thanks Matthew. As someone who has only recently woken up to the utter lunacy of the global financial corruption, I am grateful for the insights you produce in your excellent essays, well supported by historical evidence. My problem is that it seems only too apparent that humanity has, like me, woken up far far too late to prevent the tsunami of chaos now heading our way and I feel a desperation on behalf of my children who will inherit the world controlled by the likes of the WEF.
Thanks for using 'Biden's handlers' instead of 'Biden'. Could we do this for all our politicians? Bush's handlers, Obama's handlers, Merkel's handlers, Johnson's handlers, and yes, take a deep breath....Trump's handlers too.
Excellent overview, Matt. Thank you!
You put together some amazing stuff Matt. It took me a long time to find you but I'm glad I did.
Mathew, thank you for this informative essay. My introduction to your work. I look forward to devouring the rest of your substack. Whilst I largely agree with your historical analysis of the machinations and motives behind the global control grid, I question the implied narrative that the Russia/China axis is standing up for a nation state model and somehow fighting the NWO. Their joint statement is littered with NWO buzzwords and could be straight out of Davos. Multipolarity, yadda, yadda. At best this can be viewed as jockeying for position within an accepted and agreed upon technocratic vision for the post petrodollar world. Keywords and phrases: sustainable development, economic globalization, transformation of the global governance architecture and world order, universal human values as peace, development, equality, justice and democracy, to protect the United Nations-driven international architecture and the international law-based world order.
Absurdly, they talk of understanding that democracy is a universal human value, rather than a privilege. Their long-standing traditions of democracy. They ‘oppose the abuse of democratic values and interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states under the pretext of protecting democracy and human rights.’ Laughable. China, democracy within our totalitarian surveillance states. ‘Promotion and protection of human rights is a shared responsibility of the international community.’ Even more laughable. Genocide, that well known tool used to ‘protect human rights’?
Obligatory mention of 2030 sustainable development goals. Yeah, yeah. Sounds noble - poverty reduction, food security, vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity. Read global biosecurity state (multipolar of course) and social credit system.
The ‘harmonious development of humankind’. Sure, they’re all about this. The ‘protection of life and health of the population’. Read transhumanism and Human Genome Project. ‘Increase cooperation in the development and manufacture of vaccines against the new coronavirus infection’. Well of course. ‘implementing quarantine measures in the border areas and ensuring the stable operation of the border crossing points, and intend to consider establishing a joint mechanism for epidemic control’. We all know the true intention here is epidemic control. Nothing else to see. Here’s another comedy nugget - ‘The Russian side welcomes the work carried out jointly by China and WHO to identify the source of the new coronavirus infection and supports the China – WHO joint report on the matter.’
And to turn the irony meter up to 11 - ‘The sides condemn terrorism in all its manifestations’. Those peace loving cuddly bunnies. I guess if you redefine terrorism as per vaccine, epidemic etc the skies the limit. I do like their not so subtle dig at the Yanks ‘condemn the practice of interference in the internal affairs of other States for geopolitical purposes through the use of terrorist and extremist groups as well as under the guise of combating international terrorism and extremism.’ And the prescient talk/warning of NATO expansion and bioweapons threat.
And so it goes on. Veiled threats aside, pretence that the nation state/multipolar model is alive and well, this could have been penned by one of Schwab’s lackeys. And almost certainly was. Xi and Putin’s tied to WEF and Young Leaders Programme are hardly a secret. The Russian hacking/cybersecurity false flags exposed by their heavy involvement in Cyber Polygon. This is one big club and we’re not in it.
Matthew, Another lucid, if somewhat unsettling summation of the backstory of “how did we get here”. Does much to explain the complexities of our current malaise, not least the twisted rationale underpinning the Great Eugenocide which we are experiencing, which so many still simply do not — or do not want to — get. Thank you for this.
Wells' arguments are as feeble as any other pseudo-intellectual who fancies himself a philosopher.
"These were simply: 1) human nature was intrinsically absurd, selfish and incapable of resolving the duty-freedom paradox in any believable manner, 2) science and technology would thus always be used towards selfish and destructive ends, 3) world government is the only salvation for humanity."
His conclusion (3) rests upon the idea that those implementing and operating the world government are somehow immune to both (1) and (2). Somehow, in a manner never properly explained, "science and technology" are supposed to provide the answer to this. Yes, science and technology will always be used towards selfish and destructive ends - as shown by their use in implementing a world government!
Wells was a creative mind and a wonderful storyteller, but sadly, he was a hack as a philosopher.
A great post. The Bertrand Russell quote from the year of my birth is quite enlightening.
Brilliant piece. Thank you. It has given me much needed hope. It still shocks me how the changes in the last couple of years have meant that any discord with the mainstream narrative has been hailed as Russian propaganda or that somehow someone is suddenly “far-right”? We are forced to whisper in corridors that Russia is doing better than us - 14% debt to GDP vs. Ludicrously unplayable debts here in the UK, Europe and the US! Somehow the mention of that and we are the enemy. I’m using the word we as it’s great to read a piece that has demonstrated my feelings about Russia/China were not wrong!
Thank you Matthew. Well explained as always.
Would love a full layout of who Obama really is. Thanks for all of you both do.....all of it.
Brilliant article again, Matthew.
Daniels vision about two kings, north and south@ 11:26 Concerning the King of the South "those eating his delicacies will cause his downfall". vs27 "Regards these two kings they will sit at the table telling lies to each other". They sound awfully like 'The clash of two systems'?
Very timely and good article. Helped clarify why I think Russia is the good guy in all of this (ie for the vast masses of people and the ideals which we in the US have instilled in us...peoples in charge of their own destiny, and the worth of the nation-state).