9 Comments
Apr 18Liked by Matthew Ehret

Splendid stuff Matthew. 4 decades at this stuff and I find much food for consideration in these. 🙏

A Cantab. Maths Degree and a lifetime in music / music theory / philosophy of science have led me where I am today. I hope the stacks I am soon to release will be of use.

Music is the pointer.

THE HARMONIC PRINCIPLE

Perception of harmony is perception of reality : the underlying unity behind the apparent separation

COROLLARY

In reality there is no discord.

Sounds wooly. But it isn’t. Hope you get to see my presentations on Music Theory / The Philosophy of Science

Enjoyed so many of your presentations. The Occult Tesla series particularly.

Expand full comment

Thanks, and enjoying your very interesting analysis of two differing perceptions of reality, grouping individuals into two separate camps of basic beliefs. Hopefully they all agree that the Universe is intelligent.

Expand full comment

I'm going to have to join Vasile on this. Rather than ad hominem attacks on scientists, how about proving the principles (rightly or wrongly) associated with them incorrect if you disagree with them. One of your themes seems to be that subjective understanding and objective reality should match up. From there, you argue Euclid is wrong and "curved space" is right. Haven't you got that backwards? Which is more intuitive?

I've spent quite a bit of time showing that Euclid's Fifth Postulate can be proven if one accepts Euclid's express stipulation that straight lines be used. https://euclid5-newton.com/?p=413 Non-Euclidean geometry follows from the use of curved lines, rather than straight ones. (GIGO) This is so regardless of all the hype about the alleged failure to prove Euclid's Fifth Postulate leading to "curved space." If you think that's wrong, than prove it wrong.

If our intuitive three-dimensional understanding is correct, why hyperventilate about the perceived glories of "curved space?" What exactly about "curved space" is it that separates the good guys from the bad guys in science?

Expand full comment

Tesla attacked Einstein on his statements . He should question Einstein's knowledge what was based on Einstein's wife whom he beaten every day . Einstein was a E.T. A. Hoffmann character from his novel : "The Little Zaches ". Our history is loaded with fake scientists like nuclear stars Neumann , Szilard, Oppenheimer .

Expand full comment

Re: Steven Greer, talk is cheap. Why doesn't he show us how the energy contained within an empty mug can bring a pot of water to boil, let alone a whole ocean. Seems like a pay-op to me.

Expand full comment