7 Comments

Since WW2, U.S. control of “the West” has increased and is now essentially complete. In the past few decades, Ashkenazis have taken control of all of the nodes of U.S. power: through AIPAC, Ashkenazis control precisely 97 of our 100 U.S. senators and a similar percentage of U.S. House Members. They also control our news media, entertainment industry, finance, etc.

Thus, while the U.S. controls “the West,” and Ashkenazis control the U.S., it is Ashkenazis who control ALL of “the West.”

We are being impelled into a catastrophic WW3 by those now in control. If humanity is to survive, it must retake control of our power nodes, starting with our government and news media.

What ought to be our voices, are now exclusively Ashkenazi voices dictating our national policies.

Will America (and the rest of “the West”) be able to regain control? It won’t be easy. It will require actual patriots. We are about to find out,

Expand full comment

War is necessary for the people in power (politicians in both parties, major corporations, etc.) who make tons of money from war! War is business, and they do not care about the casualties of war! The politicians will pretend that they care by stuffing their faces with hot dogs and hugging a baby on Memorial Day for optics and theatrics on television by saluting those lost in war, but in the end, they do not care! It is all about the Benjamins and power for these people!

Expand full comment

Going into WWIII fulfills an old testament command to commit genocide. https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/wwiii The middle east cannot come to peace without resolution of the old testament and the 3 religions that follow it.

Expand full comment

I think that the old testament tries to come to terms with the question “Why do people, who consider themselves to be ‘good’, do evil and tolerate their leaders doing evil?”

Expand full comment

'good' and 'evil' are not absolute categories. the meaning we give to both depends on the context.

Expand full comment
Aug 4·edited Aug 4

Sure. And it so happens that sometimes these meanings are so warped — regardless of the context — that evil doing can be (falsely) justified as doing good. Not everyone has a well enough developed conscience to discern actual good behavior from actual evil behavior. Don’t logical truth tables approximate logical truth vs logical falseness. If a statement can definitely be absolutely true or absolutely false, it stands to reason (in my opinion) that a behavior can be judged/discerned as absolutely good or absolutely evil. When we argue the merits of this, we’re well down the road of moral relativism. Your thoughts?

Expand full comment

not 'moral relativism', but an awareness of another's point of view. most healthy people have an innate sense of what's fair (even children, at a very young age, are able to tell you something's "not fair!!"). by listening to others we can learn about different moral codes. some of our oldest ones, like the Old Testament's Ten Commandments, were probably based on texts dating back to a Babylonian source (Code of Hammurabi, 1750 BC).

Expand full comment