7 Comments

Sergei Glazyev expounds the Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)as Professors Michael Hudson and Stephanie Kelton expound MMT. Prof. Hudson praises Mr. Glazyev regularly. Based on my modest analysis, and recent reading of the third edition of Prof. Hudson’s “Superimperialism,” Russia is doing what the UK and the-then EEC dared not do in 1972 after the US shut the hold window. The result today is the “global fracture” of which Prof. Hudson wrote in his 1970’s book, “Global Fracture”.

Mr. Ehret, please arrange an interview with Michael Hudson. Your respective teachings on money and credit are remarkably congruent. Please ask him whether it is his opinion that the death of FDR, the ascent of the City of London and MI6 after FDR’s death, and the assassination JFK marked the derailment points for US credit and money policy that emerged from 1944 Breton Woods.

Thank you very much again. Peter

Expand full comment
author

There does seem to be some synergy there, but I like LaRouche, and so does Glazyev. Michael Hudson for some reason really despises LaRouche to the extreme so I don't think he'd want to talk to me. On that note, you might enjoy this 2001 filmed dialogue between LaRouche and Glazyev which was but one of dozens of such meetings. Russian Academician and former Ambassador to the UN Sergey Menchikov also presents at this particular forum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkNlazEBZvo

Expand full comment

Matt, you ought to approach Michael Hudson anyway, notwithstanding his opinion of Mr. LaRouche. I see value in discussion of his book “And Forgive Them Their Debts” (2019), which established the origin of sovereign, self-extinguishing growth-inducing debt in Sumer (with great discussion of the contrasts between Jesus and Hillel on debt jubilees), in the framework of the First and Second National Banks of the US, the American System, and the work of Sergei Glazyev in Russia. Hudson likes Glazyev. Common ground for discourse exists, I dare say. Peter

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022·edited Mar 31, 2022

So when you say, "balancing central coordinating power with a liberty and flexibility which protects inalienable rights of all individual member states and citizens." I am a bit confused as I am not sure how that squares with mandated vaccines in a pandemic engineered by the global pharmafia, that much is absolutely obvious now. If both Russia and China are going for the vaccine passports, then that is absolutely not a protection of inalienable rights of individual citizens, not at all. The vaccine passport is the one thing that is uniting all people AGAINST tyrannical govts that want to forcibly inject anything into anyone's body, and natural law does not cover central states of any kind violating the body God gave us to take care of. Surely if Russia and China are economically advanced they must be able to understand that the western empire of lies includes fraudulent science, in which they funded anything that could be twisted to support profits and eugenics, even if it was fraudulent -- and that includes virology. The bioweapons they are creating and killing us with are in our tap water, on our food, and in their geoengineering planes, also being sprayed on our forests right now. And also the microwave towers and giant electrical grids. As you wrote about Luc Montagnier, emfs do affect our bodies, and the deep state empire of lies has surrounded us all with emfs and microwaves to cause a cancer epidemic. Russia and China have to do better than just accept the corrupt science as genuine. They have to reach past that. There is a lot that is crumbling right now, no empire of lies can create anything in a long term future because everything they created, even their science, is a lie.

Expand full comment

Russia and China are NOT forcing people to get vaccines. It is optional unlike Canada where you cannot keep your job, leave the country etc. Second, the Chinese vaccine is using old tech "dead virus". Since the Covid virus has NEVER been isolated, it stand to reason the Chinese vax is "nothing"; a placebo if you like containing only adjuvants. Adjuvants are the same as what you would get with a measles vax or Tetanus shot (old tech). The West is using "gene based" vaccines which is "new technology" and thus questionable. To explain why both Russia and China are playing the Globalists Covid scam. First both countries have a "Deep State". These traitors are aligned with the NWO. Both countries have not "legally" purged these traitors. Second, both countries know the West will use bio-weapons against it's population. It stands to reason that both countries need to have their populations prepared for such an attack. China was likely attacked by a Western bio-weapon in October 2019.

https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-covid-bioweapon-made-in-the-usa-aimed-at-china/

There is ample proof but regardless, the reasons are logical and legitimate.

Expand full comment

Thank you for that background on Messrs. LaRouche and Hudson. I will view the LaRouche-Glazyev dialogue.

I offer this biographical fact on Prof. Hudson: his father, Nathaniel Hudson, identified as a pro-Trotsky individual amongst other Trotskyites who organized and won The Great MInneapolis Teamster Strike of 1934. Many of the strike organizers, including the Dunne Brothers and Nathaniel Hudson, suffered prosecution and imprisonment under the Smith Act in WW2. They warned the pro-Stalin CpUSA members who scorned them that that they were next (they were right). Maybe Mr. LaRouche’s self-directed separation from Trotskyists explains the animosity Prof Hudson had for Mr. LaRouche.

Peter.

Expand full comment

Glad to be a new subscriber. I have alot of catching up to do!!!

Expand full comment