Here you can see Einstein and the MM "experiment" was wrong about the Aether, and that leads to many questions of what they wanted to hide that is in the Aether-like free energy. There were many aether experiments showing there is an aether, why don't they teach these in schools. Even in college physics I wasn't taught about these-neithe…
Here you can see Einstein and the MM "experiment" was wrong about the Aether, and that leads to many questions of what they wanted to hide that is in the Aether-like free energy. There were many aether experiments showing there is an aether, why don't they teach these in schools. Even in college physics I wasn't taught about these-neither were you.
Something is strange about all these guys given PR hype after making so-called discoveries.
Einstein also believed in, or fake believed in, Nukes which are blatantly fakery. Hiroshima and Nagasaki looked exactly like every other of 68 Japanese cities firebombed, all concrete bldgs and people in them, even at ground zero, survived. This is impossible with a nuke that, in theory, would destroy everything.
You should make logical argument based on facts you can see and experiments you can read and see the data of, not narratives and movies. There is no way you read the complex research in the MM link I gave you in a few minutes.
Here you can see Einstein and the MM "experiment" was wrong about the Aether, and that leads to many questions of what they wanted to hide that is in the Aether-like free energy. There were many aether experiments showing there is an aether, why don't they teach these in schools. Even in college physics I wasn't taught about these-neither were you.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341219567_The_Aether
Something is strange about all these guys given PR hype after making so-called discoveries.
Einstein also believed in, or fake believed in, Nukes which are blatantly fakery. Hiroshima and Nagasaki looked exactly like every other of 68 Japanese cities firebombed, all concrete bldgs and people in them, even at ground zero, survived. This is impossible with a nuke that, in theory, would destroy everything.
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/spooks-with-nukes
https://unshackledminds.com/nuclear-weapons-dont-exist-the-new-documentary-by-edmund-matthews/
https://unshackledminds.com/the-nuclear-scare-scam-by-galen-winsor-1986/
https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/michael-palmer-atomic
http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
https://jermwarfare.docdroid.com/SIhL0M5/why-explosive-nuclear-devices-may-not-exist-pdf#page=8
completely disagree with you
You should make logical argument based on facts you can see and experiments you can read and see the data of, not narratives and movies. There is no way you read the complex research in the MM link I gave you in a few minutes.