18 Comments

Matt you’re missing the part where the cabal owns all the pieces on the board, and the board itself. How in the world can you not see this? I’ve learned that in good measure from reading / watching your analysis of history. My conclusion: This “election” and “voting” is just like the others in our lifetime — a ritual designed to perpetuate the myth of “democracy,” which it’s very clear we haven’t had in a long while. We need to build entirely new systems, without the cabal.

As Whitney Webb says, “This binary thinking crap with presidential elections has to stop — CIA has meddled in elections all over the world — our elections have pretty much been fake since they’ve been around. This election is no different. … The guy in the white house is always a front for the bankers and it’s pretty much always been that way. “

Debt Slavery and the Carbon Credit Coup | Whitney Webb and Mark Goodwin

https://youtu.be/_trBBunj2WI?si=FCtqHXZ_0hddh66-

Expand full comment

FWIW, Jay Weidner claims that JFK, Nixon, Carter, Reagan and Trump were/are all fronting for a faction run through The Office of Naval Intelligence. All the other post-war presidents were/are fronting for the CIA faction. Kinda makes sense?

Expand full comment

Interesting but makes the main point: NONE of them were fronting for the people of the United States.

Expand full comment

Flippin adore Smedley Butler and tragic few folks know more than one paragraph of his book because so many examples are evergreen frauds through generations.

"In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people - didn't one of them testify before a Senate committee recently that their powder won the war? Or saved the world for democracy? Or something? How did they do in the war? They were a patriotic corporation. Well, the average earnings of the du Ponts for the period 1910 to 1914 were $6,000,000 a year. It wasn't much, but the du Ponts managed to get along on it. Now let's look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918. Fifty-eight million dollars a year profit we find! Nearly ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty good. An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent." https://web.archive.org/web/20010221102702/http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm

Expand full comment

As an aside, who was put in charge of conversion of American peace-time industry into war-time industry? A member of the BUSH CLAN.

Expand full comment

Notice that once Smedley Butler became a problem for the deep staters, he started developing belly pains and was soon dead without an autopsy.

Expand full comment

"At this stage, despite the cast of compromised characters among Trump’s support network, no one has displayed so consistent a quality of leadership that qualifies them for dealing with the current crisis as Trump has displayed."

Well put

Expand full comment

I’ve said it before and I say it again, we Must be as wraiths to this horrid system. Born live and die COMPLETELY off their grid NEVER allow them to track you or yours. Live separately from the beast system.

Expand full comment

If one raises one's vibration enough, one will achieve it.

Expand full comment
Jul 15·edited Jul 15

Excellent video on The Bankers' Plot. Thank you.

Did any of the plotters go to court or jail?

After the Patriot Act I tried to get a copy of General Smedley Butler's book with no success. It took years to get a copy. (My local library did not have copy, and even though I made requests, they get a copy, they never did to my knowledge.

PLEASE, can you make an even more detailed, thorough version? It is needed. Look how the same players (both corporate and 'dynastic' families) are still a threat!

Expand full comment

The electoral process is essential b/c freewill choice embedded in man by the Highest Authority, influences reality. Voting is consent to give your power of attorney to politicians to make decisions in your absence that become the norm like climate alarmism based on 1972 'Limits to Growth' World 3.0 flawed computer model. Planes discharging toxic chemicals 24/7 that block vital sunlight and manipulate the weather. The great reset. Lethal covid m-RNA gene therapy technology. https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=130&name=2023_06_22_there_was_no_pandemic_essay

Dr. Denis Rancourt is an accomplished interdisciplinary scientist and physicist, former tenured Full Professor of physics and lead scientist originally at the University of Ottawa, Canada.

Consent of man frees ruling entities from liability and accountability.

Expand full comment

How does forced racial integration, replacement immigration, and other racial impositions that are all around us intersect with “free will”?

Expand full comment

Thanks for asking. Every body gets to choose their behaviour, not the consequences.

Expand full comment

“Consent of man frees ruling entities from liability and accountability.”

There are few things we “consent” to, in our country. No one chooses to permit the flood of immigration from third world countries. No one chooses to bury our nation in debt to pay for endless foreign wars. Or to pay for aid to Israel. No one chose to have forced racial integration shoved onto them or to deal with the decades of fallout and death that has resulted. I don’t see any real “choices” being made.

Expand full comment

Hello James. A 'maxim' is a principle of law universally admitted as being just and consonant with reason, often upheld by the highest courts. Maxims:

He who is silent appears to consent.

An error not rebutted is approved.

Ignorance of those things which one is bound to know does not excuse.

Among many things, you will even question laws and learned men.

He who spares the guilty punishes the innocent.

A maxim is so called because its dignity is chiefest, and its authority the most certain, and because it is universally approved by all.

https://famguardian.org/Publications/BouvierMaximsOfLaw/BouviersMaxims.htm

In other words, failure to rebut harm is consent. To vote for entities who do nothing to rebut harm is consent.

Expand full comment

Well, if they want a real revolution and maybe civil war, that's one great way to bring one on.

Expand full comment

The Trump shooter appears in a circulating video, where he said he went to Stanford University, and has a 10-Inch penis.

https://t.me/myLordBebo/37588

Matt, this is huge, Stanford likely groomed him for the shooter role, or contributed to his brainwashing. It’s a dead giveaway. Blow it up.

Expand full comment

By Jason Christoff: I do understand that due to the political divide and conquer mind control inside the US, there could be thousands of people who are quite capable of such an assassination attempt. Such a shooting wouldn't have to be planned by the deep state whatsoever. Saying that, given my research, the deep state is indeed operating and controlling both candidates for the US Presidency. https://www.jchristoff.com/blog/donal-trump-assassination-attempt

Expand full comment