How did Democrats come to believe that Keynesianism wasn't an anti-American virus of British imperialism and world government? Inversely, how did Conservatives come to believe that the Austrian School of economics wasn't a Hapsburg imperial virus of anti-American poison and world government? These questions are dealt with during this conversation with Rasheed Muhammad on The Red Pill Diaries
Also watch for free our RTF Docu-Series “Escaping Calypso’s Island: A Journey Out of Our Green Delusion” and our CP Docu-Series “The Hidden Hand Behind UFOs”.
Follow my work on Telegram at: T.me/CanadianPatriotPress
Discussion about this post
No posts
The full definitions of both "liberatarian", and "nationalist", are such that any given speaker can believable define them as either very compatible, or in mortal conflict, or anywhere in between. Any nation-state will have Nationalists supporting it, including some who consider themselves libertarian. Some libertarians also embrace their own native or adopted nations. As valid as this argument is rhetorically, - that "nationalist" & "libertarian" are not, and cannot be synonymous, nevertheless, translated into day-to-day human reality, EITHER, and BOTH are compatible. The ideas which a person holds in their head & heart need not either compel or restrict any given act or action. In other words, there are HEAD GAMES, and then there is REALITY. ....ALL of politics are merely headgames....and reality is reality....anybody can act against their conscience. And BULLSHIT is rampant. Bullshit is bullshit. Politics is bullshit. But is reality itself bullshit?....
Caught it on the Chute another great one Matt and thank you!