First off "shill" literally means "An accomplice of a swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer in order to entice or encourage others", and if you are not aware that this is offensive then you need to turn your mind on. Your comment's context was two lines long which 1) called me out for being an illusionist/deceiver and 2) and avoi…
First off "shill" literally means "An accomplice of a swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer in order to entice or encourage others", and if you are not aware that this is offensive then you need to turn your mind on. Your comment's context was two lines long which 1) called me out for being an illusionist/deceiver and 2) and avoiding issue of China's butt swabs. In the past you have written me messages indicating how grateful you are for my analysis and that's nice. However, to then leap into a rude and beligerent stance "calling me to the floor" is not something I will reward with an answer. For those who care to know why I have the assessment that I do, despite China's wrong policy on COVID 19 need only ask me. They can even tell me they disagree, and give me their reasons and respectfully engage in a discussion. If what I am saying confuses you and you don't know how to do this, then I suggest thinking about how you would engage with someone you respect on a point of disagreement if you were in the same room with them and not speaking to an avatar over a keyboard. This happens alot when people spend too much time in twitter or social media land where the spraying of opinions and slanders is rather encouraged by the medium itself rather than engaging in normal human dialogue where relationships actually matter.
Hmm, I would have liked a comment, but maybe I wasn't clear about that, so if you have a spare movement please, Mr Ehret let me know what you know and/or assume with regards to the 1) who are the actors, the apparently two forces fighting behind the scene for world domination ? OR is it simply the Zionist Elite mafia supporting both sides through straw man. OR is there in fact TWO sides, One, the Globalist with their main Agenda of a One-World government with Atheism/eradicating Faith & Relegions, and the SECOND, supporting a decentralized world society, which works to ensures Nations sovereignty, and so Nationalism and Patriotism. Although, I've been in favor of the Two-Groups view, I've begun to think there may only be one, indicated by how fast the Zionist Adelsson/Netanyahu group swithed side to the Biden-Admin, og maybe even made him loose through organising the Voting fraud e.g. brought Mark Zuckerberg to help/sponsor the "training" of the pool counters etc. , the mysterious Voting machines, pressured the judges not let any voting fraud case be heard in court.
I don't have many free moments these days, but I did unpack a bunch of thoughts which relate to your questions in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSBZpwD65k0
Yeah, also true ! Important to keep a respectful tone. However, I know how it feels when someone I admired appears to have a surprising view on a subject e.g. the GOPs and the GOP supporting media e.g. FOX, Newsmax, etc. IMO unfair, unjust and totally biased support for Israel in the Palestinian conflict.
I figure we're grown-ups here and needn't walk upon eggshells. Maybe it's a britishism that I'm not apt to fully grasp, though I hold a certain fondness for Canadian politeness and sensibility.
I apologize as offending you is not my objective. I agree with the definition of shill and stand by its use, however. PRChina has progressively been on a path of technocratic totalitarianism. It's totally obvious and there's positively zero cause to mince words about it.
I lived in Beijing in the early 90s and have been there to observe the changes for the worse. Xi is horrible and your panegyric is indefensible.
First off "shill" literally means "An accomplice of a swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer in order to entice or encourage others", and if you are not aware that this is offensive then you need to turn your mind on. Your comment's context was two lines long which 1) called me out for being an illusionist/deceiver and 2) and avoiding issue of China's butt swabs. In the past you have written me messages indicating how grateful you are for my analysis and that's nice. However, to then leap into a rude and beligerent stance "calling me to the floor" is not something I will reward with an answer. For those who care to know why I have the assessment that I do, despite China's wrong policy on COVID 19 need only ask me. They can even tell me they disagree, and give me their reasons and respectfully engage in a discussion. If what I am saying confuses you and you don't know how to do this, then I suggest thinking about how you would engage with someone you respect on a point of disagreement if you were in the same room with them and not speaking to an avatar over a keyboard. This happens alot when people spend too much time in twitter or social media land where the spraying of opinions and slanders is rather encouraged by the medium itself rather than engaging in normal human dialogue where relationships actually matter.
Hmm, I would have liked a comment, but maybe I wasn't clear about that, so if you have a spare movement please, Mr Ehret let me know what you know and/or assume with regards to the 1) who are the actors, the apparently two forces fighting behind the scene for world domination ? OR is it simply the Zionist Elite mafia supporting both sides through straw man. OR is there in fact TWO sides, One, the Globalist with their main Agenda of a One-World government with Atheism/eradicating Faith & Relegions, and the SECOND, supporting a decentralized world society, which works to ensures Nations sovereignty, and so Nationalism and Patriotism. Although, I've been in favor of the Two-Groups view, I've begun to think there may only be one, indicated by how fast the Zionist Adelsson/Netanyahu group swithed side to the Biden-Admin, og maybe even made him loose through organising the Voting fraud e.g. brought Mark Zuckerberg to help/sponsor the "training" of the pool counters etc. , the mysterious Voting machines, pressured the judges not let any voting fraud case be heard in court.
I don't have many free moments these days, but I did unpack a bunch of thoughts which relate to your questions in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSBZpwD65k0
Yeah, also true ! Important to keep a respectful tone. However, I know how it feels when someone I admired appears to have a surprising view on a subject e.g. the GOPs and the GOP supporting media e.g. FOX, Newsmax, etc. IMO unfair, unjust and totally biased support for Israel in the Palestinian conflict.
I figure we're grown-ups here and needn't walk upon eggshells. Maybe it's a britishism that I'm not apt to fully grasp, though I hold a certain fondness for Canadian politeness and sensibility.
I apologize as offending you is not my objective. I agree with the definition of shill and stand by its use, however. PRChina has progressively been on a path of technocratic totalitarianism. It's totally obvious and there's positively zero cause to mince words about it.
I lived in Beijing in the early 90s and have been there to observe the changes for the worse. Xi is horrible and your panegyric is indefensible.