Between January 25-29, 2021, world leaders were corralled into a digital conference titled “The Davos Agenda” in order to discuss the foundations of the emerging new world economic architecture which has come to be called “The Great Reset”.
There have been comments made w.r.t. Xi weeding out fundamentalist military members from the CCP and being interested in reducing tension arising from Geopolitics and Chinese expansion, even including acceptance of Taiwan, but it does feel such a big step from his very recent attitudes and actions or are these just a screen to protect his position within the CCP?
Headly, I think you have to say which economy you are referring to a) the bread and butter and happiness economy or b) the financial private money creation economy. In the London controlled, Prince Charles, feudal hierarchy, the Real economy is closed but the Financial economy is wide open among the players. In the Putin/Li version the Real economy is open to development but the control of money creation and infrastructure is a closed function of government within the Belt and Road area. I don't imagine China will open its capital account except on a government to government basis. In other words, I don't think the two systems can co-exist. Take your pick.
That seems like an artificial construct to me. I can buy and sell on Alibaba from Australia , but Chinese citizens face severe restictions if they want to send money out of China or buy assets overseas. A lot of money has leaked out and the elites of course do not have any restrictionson themselves.
Have you seen all the pictures/videos of Putin with his supposed enemies? Bush, Kissinger, Trudeau, Schwab. lol It’s a big club, and I suspect you’re in it. BTW, Pierre Trudeau was a known communist and Noahide Law advocate.
You are a propagandist. Er, China’s one child policy, and the subsequent abortions or infanticides of millions of females? Er, MAURICE STRONG fled to CHINA to be with his aunt, who was hanging out with Mao and a host of Jewish communists & ‘deep state’ who were instrumental in China’s ‘humane’ communism that saw the death of millions. Keep up the satire! It’s excellent.
Where does the ancient Chinese trusts that the Chinese elders plan to release come into your play? AlL of these current events stem from that having asked Trump to run to cast out deep state worldwide cabal so as to not benefit from the st. Germain trust, Rodriguez trust and thousands of others, this is why over 200 countries shut down fast and got ride of their own corrupt leadership
Schwab is a Marxist in sheep's clothing. His notions of equality/equity(Biden) and many other points are playbook. He is not an economist rather an intellectual with NO worldly experience. This fact alone makes Schwab and those who agree with him dangerous for freedom living individuals.
I'm quite certain they are not on board despite public words. When judging a man, you observe his actions, and this is even more the case in politics where you judge a statesman by their policies. Words are words which may or may not be misdirection. Even Jeremy Bentham- the arch imperialist, pederast and hater of the revolution spoke favorably of the US right to revolution and even won the trust of dim witted republicans for his support for the USA. Ben Franklin and John Quincy Adams often spoke super politely of their nemeses among the British elite, and if you just took everyone for their words, or newspaper coverage of the day, you wouldn't have a clue where anyone stood on anything in reality.
For my part here is how I approach a problem: There are things which I know 100% and things I don't understand. I talk about what I know, and from there I draw my hypotheses about things I have yet to discover from as strong foundations as possible. Up until now, this technique has proven to systematically grow the ratio of what I know relative to what I don't know in a favorable direction and it has worked well when other people use this technique too.
I have proven to myself 100% that China is committed to certain principles of policy which are totally antagonistic to oligarchical systems, namely: 1) anti-degrowth, 2) anti-population reduction, 3) pro nation state/multipolarity, 4) national controls of banking and long term credit and 5) open system large scale development, 6) helping other nations develop full spectrum economies. So these things, I know.
Now for what I don't know (ie; China's approach to playing along with WHO protocols, or the global warming myth).
Either we are dealing with 1) mis-direction: to avoid putting a total schism into the fissures which currently exist and which if exploited can devolve super quickly into thermonuclear war, China and Russia might be playing along with the narrative with the intention of controlling the over-arching new operating system while bringing the west onboard which would be outside of the controls of the WHO-technocrat western game masters, OR they are blind spots in their thinking on matters of health science policy causing them to make serious mis-steps.
After following both nations very closely every day for many years, my mind is very much inclined to the former, as this is a form of aikido principle. In Aikido, the force of your opponent is used against them, so that the Aikido practioner needs not engage in direct kinetic force. As Bruce Lee said "be like water my friend."
I suspect that there is some admixture of all variables on various levels since China and Russia have their share of corrupt networks and fools even among the intelligentsia.
China is in support of open economic systems? I don't think so , they have a closed capital account , not an open one. They will have to keep that control in place indefinitely , as we all know to stop the outflow of capital if the account was open. It turns out that the Chinese people have no faith in the Yuan or their government. If they open the capital account the outflows would be in the trillions of dollars and break the economy completely . So as usual China asks for something from it's tradingpartners that it is not willing to do itself, typical hypocrisy from the CCP.
You seem to play a clever tit-for-tat illusion regarding current affairs. Your analysis foregoes mention of the current lockdowns and "probes" being undertaken in PR China. Are you a shill?
I wouldn't mind respectfully answering questions but "are you a shill" is not something that comes close to dignified human to human interactivity. I suggest you revisit your question from a standpoint of respect.
I gave your response some thought. I'm not aware that use of "shill" is outright offensive. Within the overall context of the comment, it doesn't seem that any indignities are being launched.
As such, I regard your response as dodging the question. In the very week where PRChina decides to butt probe its people in search of a plague through a problematic test, you're posting a piece in denial of the facts.
I like some of your work quite a bit, which is why I have fewer inhibitions about calling you to the floor when you're simply out to lunch. Your bit on the Orange Clown and now this... both curiously in ignorance of reality.
Great bit with Ellen Brown. Fantastic work on 19th-c, the banks, and the british empire.
Here, you're wayyyyyyyyyy wrong. I'm not out-and-out anti-PRChina but it's becoming ever more clear that they are lapdogs of the same forces you so clearly call out in some of your better pieces.
First off "shill" literally means "An accomplice of a swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer in order to entice or encourage others", and if you are not aware that this is offensive then you need to turn your mind on. Your comment's context was two lines long which 1) called me out for being an illusionist/deceiver and 2) and avoiding issue of China's butt swabs. In the past you have written me messages indicating how grateful you are for my analysis and that's nice. However, to then leap into a rude and beligerent stance "calling me to the floor" is not something I will reward with an answer. For those who care to know why I have the assessment that I do, despite China's wrong policy on COVID 19 need only ask me. They can even tell me they disagree, and give me their reasons and respectfully engage in a discussion. If what I am saying confuses you and you don't know how to do this, then I suggest thinking about how you would engage with someone you respect on a point of disagreement if you were in the same room with them and not speaking to an avatar over a keyboard. This happens alot when people spend too much time in twitter or social media land where the spraying of opinions and slanders is rather encouraged by the medium itself rather than engaging in normal human dialogue where relationships actually matter.
Hmm, I would have liked a comment, but maybe I wasn't clear about that, so if you have a spare movement please, Mr Ehret let me know what you know and/or assume with regards to the 1) who are the actors, the apparently two forces fighting behind the scene for world domination ? OR is it simply the Zionist Elite mafia supporting both sides through straw man. OR is there in fact TWO sides, One, the Globalist with their main Agenda of a One-World government with Atheism/eradicating Faith & Relegions, and the SECOND, supporting a decentralized world society, which works to ensures Nations sovereignty, and so Nationalism and Patriotism. Although, I've been in favor of the Two-Groups view, I've begun to think there may only be one, indicated by how fast the Zionist Adelsson/Netanyahu group swithed side to the Biden-Admin, og maybe even made him loose through organising the Voting fraud e.g. brought Mark Zuckerberg to help/sponsor the "training" of the pool counters etc. , the mysterious Voting machines, pressured the judges not let any voting fraud case be heard in court.
I don't have many free moments these days, but I did unpack a bunch of thoughts which relate to your questions in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSBZpwD65k0
Yeah, also true ! Important to keep a respectful tone. However, I know how it feels when someone I admired appears to have a surprising view on a subject e.g. the GOPs and the GOP supporting media e.g. FOX, Newsmax, etc. IMO unfair, unjust and totally biased support for Israel in the Palestinian conflict.
I figure we're grown-ups here and needn't walk upon eggshells. Maybe it's a britishism that I'm not apt to fully grasp, though I hold a certain fondness for Canadian politeness and sensibility.
I apologize as offending you is not my objective. I agree with the definition of shill and stand by its use, however. PRChina has progressively been on a path of technocratic totalitarianism. It's totally obvious and there's positively zero cause to mince words about it.
I lived in Beijing in the early 90s and have been there to observe the changes for the worse. Xi is horrible and your panegyric is indefensible.
I'm new to this site. I couldn't helped being impressed with Mr Ehret intensive knowledge on global politics and historical events, however his take on China was quite a bit different to the view I presently hold, which is that the Chinese government/leadership, the CCP, like many previous socialist/communist tyrannical regimes USSR, Khmer Rouge is itself controlled by/part of a Globalist cartel, whose ultimate goal is to rule the world though a One-World government. I believe that the EU can be included hereunder and maybe also the WHO. Here, I suspect the non-semitic Zionist (jews of the Khazarian origin, the AskeNazis, the Rothschilds), the Jesuits and the Masons/Illuminati to be the major central players. (I like to hear your opinion on that assumption).
However, Mr Ehret make some good arguments on China's anti-WEF's goal: 1) anti-degrowth, 2) anti-population reduction, 3) pro nation state/multipolarity, 4) national controls of banking and long term credit and 5) open system large scale development, 6) helping other nations develop full spectrum economies. But as Mr Ehret himself emphases: "Is this just words or has it been rsupprited by their actions ? Does China support any country without first evaluating their own economical or political benefits ? What scares me about China and make me agree with Mr "YCMGH" is exactly that, their actions, the rules/laws that CCP imposes on its own people and not least in Hongkong; the surveillance, the censorship, the forced hospital Covid-treatment, mandatory vaccinations, restriction on free speech and protest, etc.
With regard to "the Orange clown" , I have not read Mr Ehret's article on Trump, but here again I'm somewhat split. While I truly believe that Trumps was far more constitutional, respecting peoples civil rights and liberties and not least advancing measures that would help the "man win the floor" , much more that the sick political agenda the Democratic Party is pushing, favoring the Big banks, the Oligarchs, the Deep State, I am TOTALLY against the Republicans knee-jerk reflex support for Israel. The GOPs seems to be beholden to the Zionist/Israeli lobby even more than the Democrat ! However, I'm not sure if the "Orange man" would have continued the friendly politics with Israel, although Kusner appeared to have a strong influence on him. I think he was aware that the for decades have been using the US of A as their bitch, their hore as Jim Traficant [1] would have put it, but he needed their support to combat the Soros, Clinton, Gates, mafia. Yeah, I can't get around who's the actors fighting in the background for world dominance ? It seems to be there's 2 globalist mafias fighting for the power, both I believe of Zionist origin ! 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_Zhe2UUfcw
Hmm, I would have liked a comment, but maybe I wasn't clear about that, so if you have a spare movement please, Mr Ehret let me know what you know and/or assume with regards to the 1) who are the actors, the apparently two forces fighting behind the scene for world domination ? OR is it simply the Zionist Elite mafia supporting both sides through straw man. OR is there in fact TWO sides, One, the Globalist with their main Agenda of a One-World government with Atheism/eradicating Faith & Relegions, and the SECOND, supporting a decentralized world society, which works to ensures Nations sovereignty, and so Nationalism and Patriotism. Although, I've been in favor of the Two-Groups view, I've begun to think there may only be one, indicated by how fast the Zionist Adelsson/Netanyahu group swithed side to the Biden-Admin, og maybe even made him loose through organising the Voting fraud e.g. brought Mark Zuckerberg to help/sponsor the "training" of the pool counters etc. , the mysterious Voting machines, pressured the judges not let any voting fraud case be heard in court.
There have been comments made w.r.t. Xi weeding out fundamentalist military members from the CCP and being interested in reducing tension arising from Geopolitics and Chinese expansion, even including acceptance of Taiwan, but it does feel such a big step from his very recent attitudes and actions or are these just a screen to protect his position within the CCP?
Headly, I think you have to say which economy you are referring to a) the bread and butter and happiness economy or b) the financial private money creation economy. In the London controlled, Prince Charles, feudal hierarchy, the Real economy is closed but the Financial economy is wide open among the players. In the Putin/Li version the Real economy is open to development but the control of money creation and infrastructure is a closed function of government within the Belt and Road area. I don't imagine China will open its capital account except on a government to government basis. In other words, I don't think the two systems can co-exist. Take your pick.
That seems like an artificial construct to me. I can buy and sell on Alibaba from Australia , but Chinese citizens face severe restictions if they want to send money out of China or buy assets overseas. A lot of money has leaked out and the elites of course do not have any restrictionson themselves.
https://fitzinfo.net/2018/03/10/putin-dossier/
Have you seen all the pictures/videos of Putin with his supposed enemies? Bush, Kissinger, Trudeau, Schwab. lol It’s a big club, and I suspect you’re in it. BTW, Pierre Trudeau was a known communist and Noahide Law advocate.
https://fitzinfo.net/2020/12/16/justin-trudeaus-father-pushed-chabads-talmudic-noahide-laws-in-1978/
You are a propagandist. Er, China’s one child policy, and the subsequent abortions or infanticides of millions of females? Er, MAURICE STRONG fled to CHINA to be with his aunt, who was hanging out with Mao and a host of Jewish communists & ‘deep state’ who were instrumental in China’s ‘humane’ communism that saw the death of millions. Keep up the satire! It’s excellent.
Matheos very interesting all your analysis
Where does the ancient Chinese trusts that the Chinese elders plan to release come into your play? AlL of these current events stem from that having asked Trump to run to cast out deep state worldwide cabal so as to not benefit from the st. Germain trust, Rodriguez trust and thousands of others, this is why over 200 countries shut down fast and got ride of their own corrupt leadership
Also see this: https://www.facebook.com/PeoplesDaily/posts/4004736096244844
Because Chinese news agencies favorably report on the 'Great Global Reset' - https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-11-06/The-Great-Reset-From-superpowers-down-to-individuals-VcFyx66Fzi/index.html
Schwab is a Marxist in sheep's clothing. His notions of equality/equity(Biden) and many other points are playbook. He is not an economist rather an intellectual with NO worldly experience. This fact alone makes Schwab and those who agree with him dangerous for freedom living individuals.
Are you sure Russia and China are not for the World Economic Forum's "Great Global Reset" call?
I'm quite certain they are not on board despite public words. When judging a man, you observe his actions, and this is even more the case in politics where you judge a statesman by their policies. Words are words which may or may not be misdirection. Even Jeremy Bentham- the arch imperialist, pederast and hater of the revolution spoke favorably of the US right to revolution and even won the trust of dim witted republicans for his support for the USA. Ben Franklin and John Quincy Adams often spoke super politely of their nemeses among the British elite, and if you just took everyone for their words, or newspaper coverage of the day, you wouldn't have a clue where anyone stood on anything in reality.
For my part here is how I approach a problem: There are things which I know 100% and things I don't understand. I talk about what I know, and from there I draw my hypotheses about things I have yet to discover from as strong foundations as possible. Up until now, this technique has proven to systematically grow the ratio of what I know relative to what I don't know in a favorable direction and it has worked well when other people use this technique too.
I have proven to myself 100% that China is committed to certain principles of policy which are totally antagonistic to oligarchical systems, namely: 1) anti-degrowth, 2) anti-population reduction, 3) pro nation state/multipolarity, 4) national controls of banking and long term credit and 5) open system large scale development, 6) helping other nations develop full spectrum economies. So these things, I know.
Now for what I don't know (ie; China's approach to playing along with WHO protocols, or the global warming myth).
Either we are dealing with 1) mis-direction: to avoid putting a total schism into the fissures which currently exist and which if exploited can devolve super quickly into thermonuclear war, China and Russia might be playing along with the narrative with the intention of controlling the over-arching new operating system while bringing the west onboard which would be outside of the controls of the WHO-technocrat western game masters, OR they are blind spots in their thinking on matters of health science policy causing them to make serious mis-steps.
After following both nations very closely every day for many years, my mind is very much inclined to the former, as this is a form of aikido principle. In Aikido, the force of your opponent is used against them, so that the Aikido practioner needs not engage in direct kinetic force. As Bruce Lee said "be like water my friend."
I suspect that there is some admixture of all variables on various levels since China and Russia have their share of corrupt networks and fools even among the intelligentsia.
Social credit system, so humane. Total surveillance, so humane.
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/i-believe-we-are-facing-an-evil-that?s=r
China is in support of open economic systems? I don't think so , they have a closed capital account , not an open one. They will have to keep that control in place indefinitely , as we all know to stop the outflow of capital if the account was open. It turns out that the Chinese people have no faith in the Yuan or their government. If they open the capital account the outflows would be in the trillions of dollars and break the economy completely . So as usual China asks for something from it's tradingpartners that it is not willing to do itself, typical hypocrisy from the CCP.
What Derek Skinner wrote above is good.
You seem to play a clever tit-for-tat illusion regarding current affairs. Your analysis foregoes mention of the current lockdowns and "probes" being undertaken in PR China. Are you a shill?
I wouldn't mind respectfully answering questions but "are you a shill" is not something that comes close to dignified human to human interactivity. I suggest you revisit your question from a standpoint of respect.
I gave your response some thought. I'm not aware that use of "shill" is outright offensive. Within the overall context of the comment, it doesn't seem that any indignities are being launched.
As such, I regard your response as dodging the question. In the very week where PRChina decides to butt probe its people in search of a plague through a problematic test, you're posting a piece in denial of the facts.
I like some of your work quite a bit, which is why I have fewer inhibitions about calling you to the floor when you're simply out to lunch. Your bit on the Orange Clown and now this... both curiously in ignorance of reality.
Great bit with Ellen Brown. Fantastic work on 19th-c, the banks, and the british empire.
Here, you're wayyyyyyyyyy wrong. I'm not out-and-out anti-PRChina but it's becoming ever more clear that they are lapdogs of the same forces you so clearly call out in some of your better pieces.
First off "shill" literally means "An accomplice of a swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer in order to entice or encourage others", and if you are not aware that this is offensive then you need to turn your mind on. Your comment's context was two lines long which 1) called me out for being an illusionist/deceiver and 2) and avoiding issue of China's butt swabs. In the past you have written me messages indicating how grateful you are for my analysis and that's nice. However, to then leap into a rude and beligerent stance "calling me to the floor" is not something I will reward with an answer. For those who care to know why I have the assessment that I do, despite China's wrong policy on COVID 19 need only ask me. They can even tell me they disagree, and give me their reasons and respectfully engage in a discussion. If what I am saying confuses you and you don't know how to do this, then I suggest thinking about how you would engage with someone you respect on a point of disagreement if you were in the same room with them and not speaking to an avatar over a keyboard. This happens alot when people spend too much time in twitter or social media land where the spraying of opinions and slanders is rather encouraged by the medium itself rather than engaging in normal human dialogue where relationships actually matter.
Hmm, I would have liked a comment, but maybe I wasn't clear about that, so if you have a spare movement please, Mr Ehret let me know what you know and/or assume with regards to the 1) who are the actors, the apparently two forces fighting behind the scene for world domination ? OR is it simply the Zionist Elite mafia supporting both sides through straw man. OR is there in fact TWO sides, One, the Globalist with their main Agenda of a One-World government with Atheism/eradicating Faith & Relegions, and the SECOND, supporting a decentralized world society, which works to ensures Nations sovereignty, and so Nationalism and Patriotism. Although, I've been in favor of the Two-Groups view, I've begun to think there may only be one, indicated by how fast the Zionist Adelsson/Netanyahu group swithed side to the Biden-Admin, og maybe even made him loose through organising the Voting fraud e.g. brought Mark Zuckerberg to help/sponsor the "training" of the pool counters etc. , the mysterious Voting machines, pressured the judges not let any voting fraud case be heard in court.
I don't have many free moments these days, but I did unpack a bunch of thoughts which relate to your questions in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSBZpwD65k0
Yeah, also true ! Important to keep a respectful tone. However, I know how it feels when someone I admired appears to have a surprising view on a subject e.g. the GOPs and the GOP supporting media e.g. FOX, Newsmax, etc. IMO unfair, unjust and totally biased support for Israel in the Palestinian conflict.
I figure we're grown-ups here and needn't walk upon eggshells. Maybe it's a britishism that I'm not apt to fully grasp, though I hold a certain fondness for Canadian politeness and sensibility.
I apologize as offending you is not my objective. I agree with the definition of shill and stand by its use, however. PRChina has progressively been on a path of technocratic totalitarianism. It's totally obvious and there's positively zero cause to mince words about it.
I lived in Beijing in the early 90s and have been there to observe the changes for the worse. Xi is horrible and your panegyric is indefensible.
I'm new to this site. I couldn't helped being impressed with Mr Ehret intensive knowledge on global politics and historical events, however his take on China was quite a bit different to the view I presently hold, which is that the Chinese government/leadership, the CCP, like many previous socialist/communist tyrannical regimes USSR, Khmer Rouge is itself controlled by/part of a Globalist cartel, whose ultimate goal is to rule the world though a One-World government. I believe that the EU can be included hereunder and maybe also the WHO. Here, I suspect the non-semitic Zionist (jews of the Khazarian origin, the AskeNazis, the Rothschilds), the Jesuits and the Masons/Illuminati to be the major central players. (I like to hear your opinion on that assumption).
However, Mr Ehret make some good arguments on China's anti-WEF's goal: 1) anti-degrowth, 2) anti-population reduction, 3) pro nation state/multipolarity, 4) national controls of banking and long term credit and 5) open system large scale development, 6) helping other nations develop full spectrum economies. But as Mr Ehret himself emphases: "Is this just words or has it been rsupprited by their actions ? Does China support any country without first evaluating their own economical or political benefits ? What scares me about China and make me agree with Mr "YCMGH" is exactly that, their actions, the rules/laws that CCP imposes on its own people and not least in Hongkong; the surveillance, the censorship, the forced hospital Covid-treatment, mandatory vaccinations, restriction on free speech and protest, etc.
With regard to "the Orange clown" , I have not read Mr Ehret's article on Trump, but here again I'm somewhat split. While I truly believe that Trumps was far more constitutional, respecting peoples civil rights and liberties and not least advancing measures that would help the "man win the floor" , much more that the sick political agenda the Democratic Party is pushing, favoring the Big banks, the Oligarchs, the Deep State, I am TOTALLY against the Republicans knee-jerk reflex support for Israel. The GOPs seems to be beholden to the Zionist/Israeli lobby even more than the Democrat ! However, I'm not sure if the "Orange man" would have continued the friendly politics with Israel, although Kusner appeared to have a strong influence on him. I think he was aware that the for decades have been using the US of A as their bitch, their hore as Jim Traficant [1] would have put it, but he needed their support to combat the Soros, Clinton, Gates, mafia. Yeah, I can't get around who's the actors fighting in the background for world dominance ? It seems to be there's 2 globalist mafias fighting for the power, both I believe of Zionist origin ! 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_Zhe2UUfcw
Hmm, I would have liked a comment, but maybe I wasn't clear about that, so if you have a spare movement please, Mr Ehret let me know what you know and/or assume with regards to the 1) who are the actors, the apparently two forces fighting behind the scene for world domination ? OR is it simply the Zionist Elite mafia supporting both sides through straw man. OR is there in fact TWO sides, One, the Globalist with their main Agenda of a One-World government with Atheism/eradicating Faith & Relegions, and the SECOND, supporting a decentralized world society, which works to ensures Nations sovereignty, and so Nationalism and Patriotism. Although, I've been in favor of the Two-Groups view, I've begun to think there may only be one, indicated by how fast the Zionist Adelsson/Netanyahu group swithed side to the Biden-Admin, og maybe even made him loose through organising the Voting fraud e.g. brought Mark Zuckerberg to help/sponsor the "training" of the pool counters etc. , the mysterious Voting machines, pressured the judges not let any voting fraud case be heard in court.