In this episode of Press TV's Spotlight, John Bosnitch and I offer our analysis of the BRICS Summit in South Africa, the obstacles to a new multipolar economic architecture and the difference in concepts of value found in this system vs the collapsing rules-based international order of monetarist looting.
I am on Team Trump and the America First MAGA Patriots. You are apparently on Team Xi and the BRICS+ so I just bought your two books on the China Psyops because like you wrote, “Know your Enemy.”
Hey William. As you know I am a supporter of Trump and I don't see it as exclusive of supporting the BRICS+ or Xi. I'm also happy that you bought the two volumes and hope you enjoy the content
It is impossible to be on Team Trump and simultaneously support a Maoist dictator like Xi and his totalitarian technocracy in China. What I am struggling to understand is why supposed Patriots like Matthew Ehret, Cynthia Chung, the laroucheorganization.com, and even Alex Krainer can be supporters of the BRICS after reading the XV BRICS Summit Declaration?
It seems to me that BRICS is not just a “Belt and Road Initiative” for global infrastructure development, but in actuality BRICS is laying the foundation for “Global Governance” led by China. The XV BRICS Summit Declaration reads like a bureaucratic administrative guidebook for implementing a One World Global Governance Technocracy. It looks like the UN and all of its sub-agencies (WHO, WTO, IMF, etc.) are all caught in the middle of a Tug-of-War between the BRICS and the WEF. The question is….who will win control over the UN and get to implement their version of Global Governance? In light of this apparent Tug-of-War between BRICS and WEF is the added confusion of why would the WEF hold its Summer Davos in China???
Hey William. I say this with fully respect, but your confusion is due to a lack of awareness of the factors at play, and a certain superficially in your method of analysis. Trump's synergy with the fight to established a viable financial-security-cultural program along side Russia and China is documented thoroughly in my book series as well as the video I published on 'Why China Kicked out George Soros in 1989' which you can watch here: https://rumble.com/v2a5pde-how-china-banned-soros-in-1989-a-canadian-patriot-press-film.html
You place too much importants on words rather than real processes shaping reality, and due to that over-valuation of words, you have found yourself accepting toxic narratives shaping how your mind receives, and judges facts, while closing your mind off of facts that disrupt those judgements you have allowed yourself to commit to far too quickly.
Again, I'm not trying to insult you here, but I really do encourage you to with-hold your leaps to judgement in order to evaluate a wider array of facts objectively such as reading through the entire BRICS declaration and not merely looking at selected points enumerated after point 52 which fall into your pre-judgement of the New World Order. Seriously, take 15 min and read the whole list of points in the declaration, including the emphasis on using hydropower, nuclear power and even fossil fuels, ending poverty, promoting industrial growth for all nations, and then compare those written words with actual measurable actions taken by China and other allies in regards to protocols which undermine oligarchist systems.
But seriously, you need to use a different method of analysis and be more rigorous before leaping to judgement. Start with the link to my video above and ideally work through the Breaking Free of Anti-China Psyops vol 1 which you mentioned that you purchased.
Why do you avoid all of the Declaration’s references to global governance, Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, climate change, and all of its other bureaucratic administrative-ese that promotes a One World United Nations?
I forgot to mention that it is quizzical/puzzling that the XV BRICS Summit Declaration was written in such perfect English without any hint of an accent coming from the languages of the host countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, or South Africa. It makes me wonder just who the intended audience of the Declaration was written for, obviously not the people of the host countries, but more likely the people of the Western countries.....their Enemy.
It was translated into many languages. English happens to be a lingua franca at this moment in history due to the hegemony of Anglo-American colonialism for the past few centuries, so it shouldn't surprise you that people across BRICS nations include folks who speak and write english rather well
Matthew, I am beginning to think BRICS project is not a real opposition to Western Oligarchical Plans but an integral step towards Global Oligarchical Unity. Apparent dialectic oppositions are a prerequisite to a mother of all crisis which can then be only “resolved” through the global oligarchical unity (synthesis). That is the final stage of globalism - one world oligarchical rule.
There are oligarchical dialectics and authentic opposites. Oligarchist false opposites can be seen everywhere throughout history to our present day where both sides ulimate share the identical core value system. The case of the right wing reactionaries of France's Girondins vs the left wing anarcho-pseudorevolutionaries of the Jacobins is an example. The Epicurean movement vs Stoic movement of ancient Rome is another. The atheist anti-fa Soros left of modern jacobins today vs the right wing Trad reactionary movement that believes giving the vote to women was evil is another example of two pathways to fascism. In the first case the oligarchist false opposition was designed to destroy the authentic opposition to evil led by Benjamin Franklin's allies in France like Jean Sylvain Bailey, Lavoisier, etc who were murdered yet who understood politics from the standpoint of a true higher epistemological plane. For the ancient Roman dualism, it was Cicero and his network who were destroyed who was threatening both Stoic and Epicurean thought-matrices by his higher understanding of republican statecraft and natural law. In the third example, Trump's policy outlook during 2016=2020 demonstrated an authentic strategic outlook based upon an genuine series of goals and values in alignment with human self-interest absent in the neo-con/trad vs neo-lib anarcho extreme. For the case of China, Russia, Iran, Ethiopia and co today, the value system of their systems is not in alignment with the value systems of those oligarchist false oppositions which i have seen destroy the good so many times throughout history. My wife and I conducted deep dives into this topic in the two volume Breaking Free of Anti-China Psy Ops special report (email me if you want a free PDF)... Also I suggest you review my recent two part series: My recent studies tackle the question of the two opposing concepts of "global development", "sustainability", UN Agenda 2030", "fourth industrial revolution" etc etc which are currently clashing and which may have words/labels which overlap nominally YET arise from two incompatible views of the universe, human nature, natural law, value etc.
Sure, on the surface Western oligarchy seems in conflict with China, Russia, etc. and the effects are real, but in reality what they care about the most is to have Russia's and China's oligarchies join them in the One World System. This is a longer term process which requires people of these countries to accept the new reality. In fact in many areas those oligarchies are already implementing WEF policies in their own countries. If they were truly independent they would not be implementing policies which are clearly anti-their-own-people.
Conflict is in itself a managed process; that does not mean that the opposition is not real. It may even escalate into a nuclear war, if that is what is required, but at the end of the day, their goal is one world government. Everything they do of any significance is coupled to that overarching goal. Not only do they target China and Russia, they are also destroying both economies and the best thought frameworks and traditions in the West. They are destroying all independent centers across the globe. When they are done, they may engineer an "alien invasion" which will be the pretext to "unify" all countries regardless of previous "disagreements". Oligarchies will meld into one unified neo-feudal criminal management system. If the aim is solely to militarily beat Russia and China, why would Western oligarchy be destroying its economic and industrial base? Why would they force jab members of their own military and exhausting their weaponry in Ukraine?
I see the current wars and tensions as managed events, no different than KOVID psy-op. All engineered events are hybrid of real and synthetic with no clear delineation between those two components. The final result might even see the center moving to China, which would be no different than oligarchies behind the British Empire switching to then the new center - USA. British Empire may have collapsed but the oligarchies stayed intact, and an integral part of a larger Oligarchy, richer and with more power than before. I believe it is an error to read too much into the apparent resistance of some nation-states. Western Oligarchy has been diluting sovereignty of all nation states in its own domain and that will eventually include Russia, China and the rest.
The only other way to explain their behavior is an incredible apparent stupidity of the Western Oligarchies, but in reality they are not as stupid as they'd like us believe. That is why they are parading utter corrupt morons in positions of nominal power. But Biden and such aren't real decision makers; surely we'd agree on that. They are bringing us down for strategic reasons, not because of their stupidity.
Yo Martin. I sympathize with the perplexity over how an oligarchy exhibiting a power and certain perverse type of brilliance can also be self-destructive and animated by a type of stupidity causing their ultimate undoing. From my studies of history, my entire fascination has been how and why do oligarchies fuck up? Our entire world history is literally scattered with oligarchical plans blowing up in the face of the grand strategists, and while they have a brilliant adaptive power and capability to think long term there is this other thing within oligarchical closed system psycho-pathology that prevents them from not undoing themselves. Inversely there is a deeper, subtle and powerful trend of great goodness that the oligarchy has been obsessed with crushing for thousands of years. That trend is tied to goodness, natural law and is something I recognize in the policy actions, values and method of operation animating the current adults in the room among the better part of eurasia's statesmen. Again, I'm giving you alot to chew on with links to alot of my writings on this topic and also countless lectures, books, videos etc that I've made to make my thinking on this transparent. I highly recommend taking advantage of these resources
Matthew, I agree with everything you say about oligarchical systems throughout the history. They make huge mistakes driven by enormous hubris, but they can also kill millions of people with their scheming and manipulations. The technological advancements have now turbocharged their power to inflict damage to billions of human lives. We currently have an oligarchical system with unprecedented powers to control people, to inflict damage, to kill, while the majority of humanity is utterly unaware of the war being waged against us. Without a critical mass of awareness and resistance we will fail to protect ourselves. This combination is deadly.
Where we differ, I think, is that you see the resistance by China, Russia, et al to Western Oligarchy as a potential salvation, while I see oligarchies in these countries which will sooner side with their oligarchical brethren in the West than with their own people let alone with people living under Western Oligarchical yoke. Whatever is happening now is not something which is likely end in our liberation; I mostly see jockeying for better final oligarchical settlement. Only we can save ourselves; nobody else will. We can still save ourselves and overthrow this system, but it cannot happen with the current velocity of awakening. KOVID was a test which Humanity has failed. Nobody can predict the future, but based on current force diagram, I would say we are in deep trouble.
I feel like you're not actually thinking about the points that I have been making. As I lay out the point clearly in the article I referenced in my first response to you, (on top of the myriad of other locations that I've developed this point), the core aims, principles, effects and designs of the Chinese, Russian alliance that serves as bedrock of a new system stands in total opposition to the evil death cult agenda animating the unreconstructed Nazi system that took over the western nations the minute Franklin Roosevelt died. I'm not saying China or Russia can save us, but I will say that without their fighting as they have fought and continue to fight then we will not be able to save ourselves. Lastly, I highly recommend you actually read my referenced essay and tell me what it is wtihin its content that confuses you:
Matthew, a very thoughtful essay. I am fully aware of real physical development of China, Russia, India,... They are doing what the young US Republic wished to do in contrast to the British Empire. At the end, American System was undermined and oligarchical structures behind British Empire took over the US. American physical development was real just as China’s is today, and yet the oligarchical system prevailed and killed off American physical development. Other countries wanted to follow the lessons of the American System. Germany, Japan, South Korea, Soviet Union, and now China, have all used American System’s methods through works of Friedrich List. There are no other quick ways to increase the standard of living of a country. It is obvious to both of us that British Oligarchy won the battle with the American System. Western Empire is a continuation of British Empire with the visible imperial center shifting to the US. What I currently see is the replay of the imperial methods used to subdue the US being used against China. It took two world wars, in addition to constant internal meddling, to destroy American independence. I do not wish what had happened to the US to happen to China and any of the others desiring real physical improvements of their countries. We both know that the Empire is relentless and is willing to do ANYTHING to achieve its perverted goals. In addition, both China and Russia, in contrast to Early American Republic, are rather comfortable with totalitarian measures for controlling their respective populations. In this respect, the Western Empire’s descent into totalitarian control of its population is totally in sync with China’s. During KOVID psy-op there have obviously been some level of coordination of measures, to me, a most troubling indicator. China/Russia “victory” over Western Empire is unlikely to undo the totalitarian shift which we are currently undergoing. I see a lot of potential convergence between “east” and “west” and it is all troubling. There is a good chance that an emerging China’s oligarchy will at some point decide that they have more in common with Western Oligarchy than with its own people. This development is already more visible in Russia. British Oligarchy won by fostering its own oligarchical Fifth Column in the US, and they are surely currently using the same methodology on the target countries. The same can happen again. It is worth keeping in mind that the British Nation State was utterly exhausted by WWI, WWII and colonial (mis)adventures. And yet, the British Oligarchy prevailed over a dynamic and growing nation state - the US. The same can happen again.
I believe we are mostly on the same frequency with the difference being in your more optimistic outlook and my grimmer outlook. In any case, we are living through tumultuous times and I hope we both live to see the final outcome.
Anyone who professes an allegiance to UN-WEF Agenda 21/2030 Sustainable Development Goals is an enemy of the US Constitution and citizen’s personal Liberty, personal Rights, and especially the Right to personal Property Ownership.
I cannot trust a leader like Xi who is an admirer and wannabe of Mao, and who embraces CBDC, Digital ID, a Social Credit Score System, UN-WEF Agenda 21/2030 SDGs, and threatens another nation like Taiwan.
I suspect that BRICS+ and BRI are “wolves in sheep’s clothing,” and that clothing is what Mao used to wear.
Ask any American what he/she was told in his youth about his country.
We are number one. Ask any American what he thinks of Russia and he/she will tell you: I hate them. Ask any Americans what he thinks of communism and he/she will tell you how much they hate it.
Now ask them why is America number one, where is Russia and what do they know about communism and they will give you an answer as if they were 5 years old.
How long can a brainwashed society, ignorant and preoccupied with cartoons, can prevail over other civilized countries. Just compare Americas high school education and their graduates with other countries and you will discover how ignorant Americas nation must be.
A country that votes for presidents and congressional representative based on advertising reaching billions of dollars, how long can it survive while others educate themselves and develop economically and scientifically.
America buys foreign talents to stand out. Right after the war they corrupted German scientists who build their weapons to move to America. Review American scientific literature and you will find out that majority of scientist do not have Anglo Saxon names.
Loving America is not to accept the corruption and manipulations that eventually will surface and destroy. Now is the time when it becomes obvious that behind this dark curtain there is a long standing rot that no fumigation can help. Americans need to re-examine their participation and acceptance of a system created by a few for a few.
When you see how the American Justice System IS BEING MISUSED to defy Donald Trump as the president of "We The People" - HOW COULD ANY ALTERNATIVE BE POSSIBLY WORSE - especially comparing the "BRICS" approach of "WIN-WIN" contracts with developing countries, to the murderous American approach with STEALTH subversion, corruption & war?
Excellent discussion, enjoyed it very much. Both guests have an awe-inspiring grasp on the geopolitical situation. However, there are certain issues that concern me about the BRICS.
Whereas it certainly seems to be ushering in the end of the imperialist Anglo-American hegemonic western system, and a new multi-polar world order, what I find worrying is what they say in the following document:
1. BRICS Joint Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Statement - 15 August 2023
For example...
Par. 5 - "We believe it is necessary to address the international debt agenda properly to support economic recovery and sustainable development, while taking into account each nation’s laws and internal procedures."
Par. 6 - "We further reaffirm our commitment to a strong, quota based, and adequately resourced IMF to preserve its role at the centre of the global financial safety net."
Par. 7 - "Multilateral development banks (MDBs) are critical in reducing poverty, providing development finance, and supporting countries to attain the Sustainable Development Goals. We note the discussions on the evolution roadmap of the World Bank (WB) and initiatives of other MDBs to reassess their missions, operational or financial models."
Par. 8 - "While supporting the broad goals of the evolution of the MDBs, we call for the WB, New Development Bank (NDB) and other regional development banks to maintain their core mandate on poverty reduction and development, prioritize development programmes, and inclusive growth, including integrating climate change, gender equality and pandemics into their development agenda."
The above is just a selection of examples, which I found to be somewhat disturbing. Unless I'm missing something they seem to be on board with certain agendas that sound like they're coming from the WEF? Such as, the globalist 2030 agenda for "sustainable development", "climate change", "gender equality", and in cooperation with the WTO (admittedly they seem to be in favour of reform), the WB and the IMF?
The IMF and World Bank were the world's two first such institutions created during the 1944 conference at Bretton Woods. Along with the original UN Charter, these institutions were originally designed to be tools of actual development launched by the international new dealers working with Franklin Roosevelt.
The Chinese and Russian leadership are operating from the standpoint that they can influence these mechanisms to return to their founding principles just as they are operating on the strategic standpoint that the USA and other western nations can sober up and re-discover their constitutional better selves.
This is shaped by a deep Confucian philosophy from China side and a sharp grasp of natural law from a Christian ethos from Russia's side.
The Sustainable Development Goals of the UN is made up of 17 points. Of course the agenda itself emerged un-naturally with an evil intention in the 1990s to promote a new set of dark age values for a Great Reset system that desires global depopulation, stupidification and de-industrialization. However, since the oligarchy can't say 'we want to kill everyone and restore feudalism'... so they had to use generic broad, generic rosy language with uber-vague goals that are:
1 'end poverty', 2 'no hunger', 3 'good health/wellbeing', 4 'quality education', 5 'gender equality', 6 clean water/sanitation, 7 affordable clean energy, 8 decent work/economic growth, 9 industry-innovation-infrastructure, 10 reduced inequalities, 11 sustainable cities, 12 responsible consumption/prodcution, 13 climate action, 14 clean life before water, 15 improved life on land, 16 peace-justice-strengthen institutions, 17- build partnerships to make happen.
There is obviously alot of room for maneuvering here over WHAT AND HOW will these things be defined. For the most part no sane person would think that any of those 17 things are intrinsically evil. The question is how do you define the problems and what set of values are you applying to address them? If you are a death cultist then you want to value actions on each 17 points which kills people, reduces the effect of life, makes people stupider, selfish and fearful and ironically increases inequality, land abuse, destroys partnerships, undermines life, and all of the other positive generic goals.
The question then becomes: based on the effects of their policies, ARE China and Russia advancing a death cult agenda? Is mobility of the individual both social and geographical increasing or decreasing? Is energy access and affordability per capita, and national increasing or decreasing? Is poverty decreasing and is longevity increasing? Are wars increasing or decreasing through their policies? Are productive industrial forces increasing or decreasing through their policies? How about business? Are entreprenneurs and small/medium business getting punished by ESG/carbon taxes etc? OR are businesses encouraged to access more carbon-based power? Is the industrial base of China being wired to a dependency on 'green energy systems like windmills/solar panels' as they are being sold in the west OR are those green energy systems only used for residential sectors while industrial activity is supported by hydrocarbon/nuclear/hydro power? CULTURALLY: are the cultures of Eurasian nations being coerced into embracing a woke, nihilistic anti-family, set of values OR the opposite (clue: it is the opposite).
GENDER EQUALITY: If you think there aren't serious issues globally around gender inequality you are out to lunch. Women were just granted the right to drive cars in Saudi Arabia in 2020, and still can't vote. Female genital mutilation is still rampant among tribes across Africa, and don't get me started on India and Pakistan. This generic topic doesn't mean you want to eliminate the 'male/female' sexes nor does it mean enforcing equal outcomes independent of merit.
The WTO emerged out of the earlier GATT which was created at Bretton Woods in 1944 and generally is also made up of vague rules without alot of detail supporting 'economic justice', economic freedom, blah blah blah. These institutions are vague, generic and open to being influenced towards the good or towards the evil based upon the reality of political agendas who carry weight. The reason why they are used to destructive ends is because the rules and general principles they promote are not followed so if China, Russia, Iran etc believe that they can use their new-found economic weight to influence them towards sanity instead of embracing the alternative which is total war (which means nuclear war), then I get why they would push in that direction.
Lastly, I go into this reasoning with much much more detail, supporting statistics and references in the following locations:
What a beautiful response, thank you kindly Mathew, I really do appreciate such a comprehensive and well considered answer. You've certainly clarified much of what I was concerned about, and given me a lot to ponder. On the gender equality thing, of course! For some strange reason I was thinking along the lines of transgenderism, my mistake. Not out to lunch, just lacking sleep ;^)
I'll be checking out your articles for sure. Thank you so much.
Can the people living in China and Russia openly and freely express their opinions and voice their opposition to their governments, or does everyone live in fear of each other that someone might snitch/tattle on them to the Authorities?
What may appear to be China implementing a modern version of “The American System of Political Economy” with their Belt and Road Initiative, is in reality just a bastardized illusion of a new feudalistic technocratic colonialism and imperialism for domination of Third World countries and control over their natural resources. The foundation of “The American System of Political Economy” is the entrepreneurial spirit and motivation of industrious-minded individuals who live in a nation protected by a Constitution that guarantees their personal Liberty, their personal Rights, and especially their personal Right to own Property. In order for “The American System of Political Economy” to function, independent citizens need the freedom and protection of a Constitution and Justice System to pursue their independent aspirations and ambitions, and they need a government with a nationally-owned National Bank, not a privately-owned Central Bank, with a National Credit System that stimulates investment in technology, national manufacturing, agriculture, commerce, and National Infrastructure Development, along with a Tariff System that protects the nation’s entrepreneurs and businesses from foreign “free trade” dumping of foreign goods and services that undermine national business development. Lastly, “The American System of Political Economy” requires bilateral “Fair Trade Agreements” between sovereign nation-states that protect and promote each nation’s business interests.
I advise you to review my lengthy responses to Martin and especially Bluecat Stack above.
Additionally, the Chinese have indeed prevented their national banking architecture from getting privatized due to their success in preventing a Soros-CIA driven Maidan in 1989. I write about their banking system (which has involved protectionism as well) in Breaking Free of Anti-China Psyops which you can get from my site or ask me for a free copy. They use national credit to fund infrastructure and additionally their entreprenneurs are growing at a faster rate than any other country's entreprenneurs. They have also registered more patents than the USA. Their population is extremely participatory with a myriad of elections on state, provincial and even federal levels (there are about 10 political parties across China on provincial/state, municipal levels) and hundreds of demonstrations each week across China. Part of China's system is an intensive civil duty process of surveys, criticisms of the management of political power which thousands of civil servants, elected officials etc are penalized or rewarded based on the population's feedback. That's how the ancient meritocratic system has been developed there. That works for China although it isn't something that would work here since we have a different cultural philosophical european matrix that China doesn't have. There are only common principles that we see in all nations and cultures. Again: if you don't have money but would like a copy of the Breaking Free of Anti-China Psyops reports for free, send me a private msg and I'll send you a PDF
What is your position on Central Bank Digital Currency?
If you oppose the implementation of a Central Bank Digital Currency in the USA, then how would The you stop China and the BRICS+ from requiring BRICS+ member nations to implement a CBDC as a requirement for joining BRICS+ and contracting between BRICS+ members?
What happens when the BRICS+ create their own CBDC and require BRICS+ member nations to exclusively do business using the BRICS+ CBDC?
In addition to what I stated above: any type of currency (gold, digital, paper or plastic) only has value if it is tied to actions which increase the quality of life of mankind. This is done by facilitating the freedom of action, powers of production, abundance creation, new discoveries and inventions, leaping over the limits to growth etc. When a death cult runs the show, then all value will be tied to actions which bring about greater rates of death and stasis. For any element of digital currencies which have a role to play coming out of discussion, debate and planning groups in Eurasia where hard productive commodities are valued and whose production is measurable and objectively carrying forth value, I see no evidence of death cult ethos.
Perhaps in a future posting you can compare and contrast Xi’s BRICS+ BRI with how a re-awakening of “The American System of Political Economy” can achieve peace and prosperity without sacrificing personal Liberty & Rights. Any system, such as Xi’s Technocratic China, that promotes usage of a CBDC, Digital ID, Social Credit Score System, adherence to UN Agenda 21/2030 SDGs / ESG / DEI, any promotion of the fraudulent Global Warming Crisis and/or Overpopulation Crisis, and threatens the sovereignty of independent neighboring nations, like Taiwan, should be opposed by freedom-loving people everywhere.
There’s a reason why everyone around the world wishes they could live in the USA, and not China or Russia, and that reason is because the citizens of the USA are protected by a US Constitution that guarantees personal Liberty, personal Rights, and especially personal Property ownership. The great challenge for USA citizens is to fight-off the Liberal Progressive Left and Neocon Fascists who all want to abolish the US Constitution, want to abolish the USA as an independent sovereign nation-state, and want to subordinate North America to the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy. The choice is not between the BIS/WEF/NATO and Xi’s BRICS+, but between Globalism (Technocratic Fascism) and Nationalism (The American System of Political Economy).
I am on Team Trump and the America First MAGA Patriots. You are apparently on Team Xi and the BRICS+ so I just bought your two books on the China Psyops because like you wrote, “Know your Enemy.”
Hey William. As you know I am a supporter of Trump and I don't see it as exclusive of supporting the BRICS+ or Xi. I'm also happy that you bought the two volumes and hope you enjoy the content
Hey Matt,
It is impossible to be on Team Trump and simultaneously support a Maoist dictator like Xi and his totalitarian technocracy in China. What I am struggling to understand is why supposed Patriots like Matthew Ehret, Cynthia Chung, the laroucheorganization.com, and even Alex Krainer can be supporters of the BRICS after reading the XV BRICS Summit Declaration?
It seems to me that BRICS is not just a “Belt and Road Initiative” for global infrastructure development, but in actuality BRICS is laying the foundation for “Global Governance” led by China. The XV BRICS Summit Declaration reads like a bureaucratic administrative guidebook for implementing a One World Global Governance Technocracy. It looks like the UN and all of its sub-agencies (WHO, WTO, IMF, etc.) are all caught in the middle of a Tug-of-War between the BRICS and the WEF. The question is….who will win control over the UN and get to implement their version of Global Governance? In light of this apparent Tug-of-War between BRICS and WEF is the added confusion of why would the WEF hold its Summer Davos in China???
XV BRICS+ 2023 Summit Declarations:
https://brics2023.gov.za/
https://brics2023.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Jhb-II-Declaration-24-August-2023-1.pdf
https://laroucheorganization.com/
Hey William. I say this with fully respect, but your confusion is due to a lack of awareness of the factors at play, and a certain superficially in your method of analysis. Trump's synergy with the fight to established a viable financial-security-cultural program along side Russia and China is documented thoroughly in my book series as well as the video I published on 'Why China Kicked out George Soros in 1989' which you can watch here: https://rumble.com/v2a5pde-how-china-banned-soros-in-1989-a-canadian-patriot-press-film.html
You place too much importants on words rather than real processes shaping reality, and due to that over-valuation of words, you have found yourself accepting toxic narratives shaping how your mind receives, and judges facts, while closing your mind off of facts that disrupt those judgements you have allowed yourself to commit to far too quickly.
Again, I'm not trying to insult you here, but I really do encourage you to with-hold your leaps to judgement in order to evaluate a wider array of facts objectively such as reading through the entire BRICS declaration and not merely looking at selected points enumerated after point 52 which fall into your pre-judgement of the New World Order. Seriously, take 15 min and read the whole list of points in the declaration, including the emphasis on using hydropower, nuclear power and even fossil fuels, ending poverty, promoting industrial growth for all nations, and then compare those written words with actual measurable actions taken by China and other allies in regards to protocols which undermine oligarchist systems.
But seriously, you need to use a different method of analysis and be more rigorous before leaping to judgement. Start with the link to my video above and ideally work through the Breaking Free of Anti-China Psyops vol 1 which you mentioned that you purchased.
Best
Matt
Matt,
Before you write anymore posts about the BRICS, actually READ their Declaration in their own words.
It’s only 26 pages long. I don’t think I read anywhere in those 26 pages the words, “Belt and Road Initiative.”
Read it for yourself.....
https://brics2023.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Jhb-II-Declaration-24-August-2023-1.pdf
I have read it William. Everything I wrote stands
Why do you avoid all of the Declaration’s references to global governance, Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, climate change, and all of its other bureaucratic administrative-ese that promotes a One World United Nations?
I forgot to mention that it is quizzical/puzzling that the XV BRICS Summit Declaration was written in such perfect English without any hint of an accent coming from the languages of the host countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, or South Africa. It makes me wonder just who the intended audience of the Declaration was written for, obviously not the people of the host countries, but more likely the people of the Western countries.....their Enemy.
It was translated into many languages. English happens to be a lingua franca at this moment in history due to the hegemony of Anglo-American colonialism for the past few centuries, so it shouldn't surprise you that people across BRICS nations include folks who speak and write english rather well
Matthew, I am beginning to think BRICS project is not a real opposition to Western Oligarchical Plans but an integral step towards Global Oligarchical Unity. Apparent dialectic oppositions are a prerequisite to a mother of all crisis which can then be only “resolved” through the global oligarchical unity (synthesis). That is the final stage of globalism - one world oligarchical rule.
There are oligarchical dialectics and authentic opposites. Oligarchist false opposites can be seen everywhere throughout history to our present day where both sides ulimate share the identical core value system. The case of the right wing reactionaries of France's Girondins vs the left wing anarcho-pseudorevolutionaries of the Jacobins is an example. The Epicurean movement vs Stoic movement of ancient Rome is another. The atheist anti-fa Soros left of modern jacobins today vs the right wing Trad reactionary movement that believes giving the vote to women was evil is another example of two pathways to fascism. In the first case the oligarchist false opposition was designed to destroy the authentic opposition to evil led by Benjamin Franklin's allies in France like Jean Sylvain Bailey, Lavoisier, etc who were murdered yet who understood politics from the standpoint of a true higher epistemological plane. For the ancient Roman dualism, it was Cicero and his network who were destroyed who was threatening both Stoic and Epicurean thought-matrices by his higher understanding of republican statecraft and natural law. In the third example, Trump's policy outlook during 2016=2020 demonstrated an authentic strategic outlook based upon an genuine series of goals and values in alignment with human self-interest absent in the neo-con/trad vs neo-lib anarcho extreme. For the case of China, Russia, Iran, Ethiopia and co today, the value system of their systems is not in alignment with the value systems of those oligarchist false oppositions which i have seen destroy the good so many times throughout history. My wife and I conducted deep dives into this topic in the two volume Breaking Free of Anti-China Psy Ops special report (email me if you want a free PDF)... Also I suggest you review my recent two part series: My recent studies tackle the question of the two opposing concepts of "global development", "sustainability", UN Agenda 2030", "fourth industrial revolution" etc etc which are currently clashing and which may have words/labels which overlap nominally YET arise from two incompatible views of the universe, human nature, natural law, value etc.
The first article is:
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/communism-capitalism-and-feudalism
The other article is:
https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/07/30/is-the-multipolar-alliance-controlled-opposition-the-case-of-two-green-paradigms/
Sure, on the surface Western oligarchy seems in conflict with China, Russia, etc. and the effects are real, but in reality what they care about the most is to have Russia's and China's oligarchies join them in the One World System. This is a longer term process which requires people of these countries to accept the new reality. In fact in many areas those oligarchies are already implementing WEF policies in their own countries. If they were truly independent they would not be implementing policies which are clearly anti-their-own-people.
Conflict is in itself a managed process; that does not mean that the opposition is not real. It may even escalate into a nuclear war, if that is what is required, but at the end of the day, their goal is one world government. Everything they do of any significance is coupled to that overarching goal. Not only do they target China and Russia, they are also destroying both economies and the best thought frameworks and traditions in the West. They are destroying all independent centers across the globe. When they are done, they may engineer an "alien invasion" which will be the pretext to "unify" all countries regardless of previous "disagreements". Oligarchies will meld into one unified neo-feudal criminal management system. If the aim is solely to militarily beat Russia and China, why would Western oligarchy be destroying its economic and industrial base? Why would they force jab members of their own military and exhausting their weaponry in Ukraine?
I see the current wars and tensions as managed events, no different than KOVID psy-op. All engineered events are hybrid of real and synthetic with no clear delineation between those two components. The final result might even see the center moving to China, which would be no different than oligarchies behind the British Empire switching to then the new center - USA. British Empire may have collapsed but the oligarchies stayed intact, and an integral part of a larger Oligarchy, richer and with more power than before. I believe it is an error to read too much into the apparent resistance of some nation-states. Western Oligarchy has been diluting sovereignty of all nation states in its own domain and that will eventually include Russia, China and the rest.
The only other way to explain their behavior is an incredible apparent stupidity of the Western Oligarchies, but in reality they are not as stupid as they'd like us believe. That is why they are parading utter corrupt morons in positions of nominal power. But Biden and such aren't real decision makers; surely we'd agree on that. They are bringing us down for strategic reasons, not because of their stupidity.
Yo Martin. I sympathize with the perplexity over how an oligarchy exhibiting a power and certain perverse type of brilliance can also be self-destructive and animated by a type of stupidity causing their ultimate undoing. From my studies of history, my entire fascination has been how and why do oligarchies fuck up? Our entire world history is literally scattered with oligarchical plans blowing up in the face of the grand strategists, and while they have a brilliant adaptive power and capability to think long term there is this other thing within oligarchical closed system psycho-pathology that prevents them from not undoing themselves. Inversely there is a deeper, subtle and powerful trend of great goodness that the oligarchy has been obsessed with crushing for thousands of years. That trend is tied to goodness, natural law and is something I recognize in the policy actions, values and method of operation animating the current adults in the room among the better part of eurasia's statesmen. Again, I'm giving you alot to chew on with links to alot of my writings on this topic and also countless lectures, books, videos etc that I've made to make my thinking on this transparent. I highly recommend taking advantage of these resources
Matthew, I agree with everything you say about oligarchical systems throughout the history. They make huge mistakes driven by enormous hubris, but they can also kill millions of people with their scheming and manipulations. The technological advancements have now turbocharged their power to inflict damage to billions of human lives. We currently have an oligarchical system with unprecedented powers to control people, to inflict damage, to kill, while the majority of humanity is utterly unaware of the war being waged against us. Without a critical mass of awareness and resistance we will fail to protect ourselves. This combination is deadly.
Where we differ, I think, is that you see the resistance by China, Russia, et al to Western Oligarchy as a potential salvation, while I see oligarchies in these countries which will sooner side with their oligarchical brethren in the West than with their own people let alone with people living under Western Oligarchical yoke. Whatever is happening now is not something which is likely end in our liberation; I mostly see jockeying for better final oligarchical settlement. Only we can save ourselves; nobody else will. We can still save ourselves and overthrow this system, but it cannot happen with the current velocity of awakening. KOVID was a test which Humanity has failed. Nobody can predict the future, but based on current force diagram, I would say we are in deep trouble.
I feel like you're not actually thinking about the points that I have been making. As I lay out the point clearly in the article I referenced in my first response to you, (on top of the myriad of other locations that I've developed this point), the core aims, principles, effects and designs of the Chinese, Russian alliance that serves as bedrock of a new system stands in total opposition to the evil death cult agenda animating the unreconstructed Nazi system that took over the western nations the minute Franklin Roosevelt died. I'm not saying China or Russia can save us, but I will say that without their fighting as they have fought and continue to fight then we will not be able to save ourselves. Lastly, I highly recommend you actually read my referenced essay and tell me what it is wtihin its content that confuses you:
https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/07/30/is-the-multipolar-alliance-controlled-opposition-the-case-of-two-green-paradigms/
Matthew, a very thoughtful essay. I am fully aware of real physical development of China, Russia, India,... They are doing what the young US Republic wished to do in contrast to the British Empire. At the end, American System was undermined and oligarchical structures behind British Empire took over the US. American physical development was real just as China’s is today, and yet the oligarchical system prevailed and killed off American physical development. Other countries wanted to follow the lessons of the American System. Germany, Japan, South Korea, Soviet Union, and now China, have all used American System’s methods through works of Friedrich List. There are no other quick ways to increase the standard of living of a country. It is obvious to both of us that British Oligarchy won the battle with the American System. Western Empire is a continuation of British Empire with the visible imperial center shifting to the US. What I currently see is the replay of the imperial methods used to subdue the US being used against China. It took two world wars, in addition to constant internal meddling, to destroy American independence. I do not wish what had happened to the US to happen to China and any of the others desiring real physical improvements of their countries. We both know that the Empire is relentless and is willing to do ANYTHING to achieve its perverted goals. In addition, both China and Russia, in contrast to Early American Republic, are rather comfortable with totalitarian measures for controlling their respective populations. In this respect, the Western Empire’s descent into totalitarian control of its population is totally in sync with China’s. During KOVID psy-op there have obviously been some level of coordination of measures, to me, a most troubling indicator. China/Russia “victory” over Western Empire is unlikely to undo the totalitarian shift which we are currently undergoing. I see a lot of potential convergence between “east” and “west” and it is all troubling. There is a good chance that an emerging China’s oligarchy will at some point decide that they have more in common with Western Oligarchy than with its own people. This development is already more visible in Russia. British Oligarchy won by fostering its own oligarchical Fifth Column in the US, and they are surely currently using the same methodology on the target countries. The same can happen again. It is worth keeping in mind that the British Nation State was utterly exhausted by WWI, WWII and colonial (mis)adventures. And yet, the British Oligarchy prevailed over a dynamic and growing nation state - the US. The same can happen again.
I believe we are mostly on the same frequency with the difference being in your more optimistic outlook and my grimmer outlook. In any case, we are living through tumultuous times and I hope we both live to see the final outcome.
I've been pondering the exact same thing.
See my answer to Martin above
Anyone who professes an allegiance to UN-WEF Agenda 21/2030 Sustainable Development Goals is an enemy of the US Constitution and citizen’s personal Liberty, personal Rights, and especially the Right to personal Property Ownership.
BRICS+ 2023 Summit Declarations:
https://brics2023.gov.za/
https://brics2023.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Jhb-II-Declaration-24-August-2023-1.pdf
I cannot trust a leader like Xi who is an admirer and wannabe of Mao, and who embraces CBDC, Digital ID, a Social Credit Score System, UN-WEF Agenda 21/2030 SDGs, and threatens another nation like Taiwan.
I suspect that BRICS+ and BRI are “wolves in sheep’s clothing,” and that clothing is what Mao used to wear.
Ask any American what he/she was told in his youth about his country.
We are number one. Ask any American what he thinks of Russia and he/she will tell you: I hate them. Ask any Americans what he thinks of communism and he/she will tell you how much they hate it.
Now ask them why is America number one, where is Russia and what do they know about communism and they will give you an answer as if they were 5 years old.
How long can a brainwashed society, ignorant and preoccupied with cartoons, can prevail over other civilized countries. Just compare Americas high school education and their graduates with other countries and you will discover how ignorant Americas nation must be.
A country that votes for presidents and congressional representative based on advertising reaching billions of dollars, how long can it survive while others educate themselves and develop economically and scientifically.
America buys foreign talents to stand out. Right after the war they corrupted German scientists who build their weapons to move to America. Review American scientific literature and you will find out that majority of scientist do not have Anglo Saxon names.
Loving America is not to accept the corruption and manipulations that eventually will surface and destroy. Now is the time when it becomes obvious that behind this dark curtain there is a long standing rot that no fumigation can help. Americans need to re-examine their participation and acceptance of a system created by a few for a few.
Do you live in the USA?
When you see how the American Justice System IS BEING MISUSED to defy Donald Trump as the president of "We The People" - HOW COULD ANY ALTERNATIVE BE POSSIBLY WORSE - especially comparing the "BRICS" approach of "WIN-WIN" contracts with developing countries, to the murderous American approach with STEALTH subversion, corruption & war?
https://odysee.com/@MaxWende:f/Tucker-Carlson-und-Donald-J.-Trump-im-Interview-live-auf-Twitter---das-meistgesehene-Interview-der-Geschichte---23.08.23:9
Excellent discussion, enjoyed it very much. Both guests have an awe-inspiring grasp on the geopolitical situation. However, there are certain issues that concern me about the BRICS.
Whereas it certainly seems to be ushering in the end of the imperialist Anglo-American hegemonic western system, and a new multi-polar world order, what I find worrying is what they say in the following document:
1. BRICS Joint Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Statement - 15 August 2023
For example...
Par. 5 - "We believe it is necessary to address the international debt agenda properly to support economic recovery and sustainable development, while taking into account each nation’s laws and internal procedures."
Par. 6 - "We further reaffirm our commitment to a strong, quota based, and adequately resourced IMF to preserve its role at the centre of the global financial safety net."
Par. 7 - "Multilateral development banks (MDBs) are critical in reducing poverty, providing development finance, and supporting countries to attain the Sustainable Development Goals. We note the discussions on the evolution roadmap of the World Bank (WB) and initiatives of other MDBs to reassess their missions, operational or financial models."
Par. 8 - "While supporting the broad goals of the evolution of the MDBs, we call for the WB, New Development Bank (NDB) and other regional development banks to maintain their core mandate on poverty reduction and development, prioritize development programmes, and inclusive growth, including integrating climate change, gender equality and pandemics into their development agenda."
The above is just a selection of examples, which I found to be somewhat disturbing. Unless I'm missing something they seem to be on board with certain agendas that sound like they're coming from the WEF? Such as, the globalist 2030 agenda for "sustainable development", "climate change", "gender equality", and in cooperation with the WTO (admittedly they seem to be in favour of reform), the WB and the IMF?
Has anyone else noticed this?
Am I wrong?
Any thoughts?
PS. Documents can be found here:
https://brics2023.gov.za/finance-ministers-statements/
The IMF and World Bank were the world's two first such institutions created during the 1944 conference at Bretton Woods. Along with the original UN Charter, these institutions were originally designed to be tools of actual development launched by the international new dealers working with Franklin Roosevelt.
I wrote about this fight at Bretton Woods between the anti-oligarchists of the USA vs the eugenics-obsessed globalists of the British Empire here: https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/the-ugly-truth-of-john-maynard-keynes
The Chinese and Russian leadership are operating from the standpoint that they can influence these mechanisms to return to their founding principles just as they are operating on the strategic standpoint that the USA and other western nations can sober up and re-discover their constitutional better selves.
This is shaped by a deep Confucian philosophy from China side and a sharp grasp of natural law from a Christian ethos from Russia's side.
The Sustainable Development Goals of the UN is made up of 17 points. Of course the agenda itself emerged un-naturally with an evil intention in the 1990s to promote a new set of dark age values for a Great Reset system that desires global depopulation, stupidification and de-industrialization. However, since the oligarchy can't say 'we want to kill everyone and restore feudalism'... so they had to use generic broad, generic rosy language with uber-vague goals that are:
1 'end poverty', 2 'no hunger', 3 'good health/wellbeing', 4 'quality education', 5 'gender equality', 6 clean water/sanitation, 7 affordable clean energy, 8 decent work/economic growth, 9 industry-innovation-infrastructure, 10 reduced inequalities, 11 sustainable cities, 12 responsible consumption/prodcution, 13 climate action, 14 clean life before water, 15 improved life on land, 16 peace-justice-strengthen institutions, 17- build partnerships to make happen.
There is obviously alot of room for maneuvering here over WHAT AND HOW will these things be defined. For the most part no sane person would think that any of those 17 things are intrinsically evil. The question is how do you define the problems and what set of values are you applying to address them? If you are a death cultist then you want to value actions on each 17 points which kills people, reduces the effect of life, makes people stupider, selfish and fearful and ironically increases inequality, land abuse, destroys partnerships, undermines life, and all of the other positive generic goals.
The question then becomes: based on the effects of their policies, ARE China and Russia advancing a death cult agenda? Is mobility of the individual both social and geographical increasing or decreasing? Is energy access and affordability per capita, and national increasing or decreasing? Is poverty decreasing and is longevity increasing? Are wars increasing or decreasing through their policies? Are productive industrial forces increasing or decreasing through their policies? How about business? Are entreprenneurs and small/medium business getting punished by ESG/carbon taxes etc? OR are businesses encouraged to access more carbon-based power? Is the industrial base of China being wired to a dependency on 'green energy systems like windmills/solar panels' as they are being sold in the west OR are those green energy systems only used for residential sectors while industrial activity is supported by hydrocarbon/nuclear/hydro power? CULTURALLY: are the cultures of Eurasian nations being coerced into embracing a woke, nihilistic anti-family, set of values OR the opposite (clue: it is the opposite).
GENDER EQUALITY: If you think there aren't serious issues globally around gender inequality you are out to lunch. Women were just granted the right to drive cars in Saudi Arabia in 2020, and still can't vote. Female genital mutilation is still rampant among tribes across Africa, and don't get me started on India and Pakistan. This generic topic doesn't mean you want to eliminate the 'male/female' sexes nor does it mean enforcing equal outcomes independent of merit.
The WTO emerged out of the earlier GATT which was created at Bretton Woods in 1944 and generally is also made up of vague rules without alot of detail supporting 'economic justice', economic freedom, blah blah blah. These institutions are vague, generic and open to being influenced towards the good or towards the evil based upon the reality of political agendas who carry weight. The reason why they are used to destructive ends is because the rules and general principles they promote are not followed so if China, Russia, Iran etc believe that they can use their new-found economic weight to influence them towards sanity instead of embracing the alternative which is total war (which means nuclear war), then I get why they would push in that direction.
Lastly, I go into this reasoning with much much more detail, supporting statistics and references in the following locations:
The first article is:
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/communism-capitalism-and-feudalism
The other article is:
https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/07/30/is-the-multipolar-alliance-controlled-opposition-the-case-of-two-green-paradigms/
What a beautiful response, thank you kindly Mathew, I really do appreciate such a comprehensive and well considered answer. You've certainly clarified much of what I was concerned about, and given me a lot to ponder. On the gender equality thing, of course! For some strange reason I was thinking along the lines of transgenderism, my mistake. Not out to lunch, just lacking sleep ;^)
I'll be checking out your articles for sure. Thank you so much.
Can the people living in China and Russia openly and freely express their opinions and voice their opposition to their governments, or does everyone live in fear of each other that someone might snitch/tattle on them to the Authorities?
What may appear to be China implementing a modern version of “The American System of Political Economy” with their Belt and Road Initiative, is in reality just a bastardized illusion of a new feudalistic technocratic colonialism and imperialism for domination of Third World countries and control over their natural resources. The foundation of “The American System of Political Economy” is the entrepreneurial spirit and motivation of industrious-minded individuals who live in a nation protected by a Constitution that guarantees their personal Liberty, their personal Rights, and especially their personal Right to own Property. In order for “The American System of Political Economy” to function, independent citizens need the freedom and protection of a Constitution and Justice System to pursue their independent aspirations and ambitions, and they need a government with a nationally-owned National Bank, not a privately-owned Central Bank, with a National Credit System that stimulates investment in technology, national manufacturing, agriculture, commerce, and National Infrastructure Development, along with a Tariff System that protects the nation’s entrepreneurs and businesses from foreign “free trade” dumping of foreign goods and services that undermine national business development. Lastly, “The American System of Political Economy” requires bilateral “Fair Trade Agreements” between sovereign nation-states that protect and promote each nation’s business interests.
I advise you to review my lengthy responses to Martin and especially Bluecat Stack above.
Additionally, the Chinese have indeed prevented their national banking architecture from getting privatized due to their success in preventing a Soros-CIA driven Maidan in 1989. I write about their banking system (which has involved protectionism as well) in Breaking Free of Anti-China Psyops which you can get from my site or ask me for a free copy. They use national credit to fund infrastructure and additionally their entreprenneurs are growing at a faster rate than any other country's entreprenneurs. They have also registered more patents than the USA. Their population is extremely participatory with a myriad of elections on state, provincial and even federal levels (there are about 10 political parties across China on provincial/state, municipal levels) and hundreds of demonstrations each week across China. Part of China's system is an intensive civil duty process of surveys, criticisms of the management of political power which thousands of civil servants, elected officials etc are penalized or rewarded based on the population's feedback. That's how the ancient meritocratic system has been developed there. That works for China although it isn't something that would work here since we have a different cultural philosophical european matrix that China doesn't have. There are only common principles that we see in all nations and cultures. Again: if you don't have money but would like a copy of the Breaking Free of Anti-China Psyops reports for free, send me a private msg and I'll send you a PDF
What is your position on Central Bank Digital Currency?
If you oppose the implementation of a Central Bank Digital Currency in the USA, then how would The you stop China and the BRICS+ from requiring BRICS+ member nations to implement a CBDC as a requirement for joining BRICS+ and contracting between BRICS+ members?
What happens when the BRICS+ create their own CBDC and require BRICS+ member nations to exclusively do business using the BRICS+ CBDC?
In addition to what I stated above: any type of currency (gold, digital, paper or plastic) only has value if it is tied to actions which increase the quality of life of mankind. This is done by facilitating the freedom of action, powers of production, abundance creation, new discoveries and inventions, leaping over the limits to growth etc. When a death cult runs the show, then all value will be tied to actions which bring about greater rates of death and stasis. For any element of digital currencies which have a role to play coming out of discussion, debate and planning groups in Eurasia where hard productive commodities are valued and whose production is measurable and objectively carrying forth value, I see no evidence of death cult ethos.
Perhaps in a future posting you can compare and contrast Xi’s BRICS+ BRI with how a re-awakening of “The American System of Political Economy” can achieve peace and prosperity without sacrificing personal Liberty & Rights. Any system, such as Xi’s Technocratic China, that promotes usage of a CBDC, Digital ID, Social Credit Score System, adherence to UN Agenda 21/2030 SDGs / ESG / DEI, any promotion of the fraudulent Global Warming Crisis and/or Overpopulation Crisis, and threatens the sovereignty of independent neighboring nations, like Taiwan, should be opposed by freedom-loving people everywhere.
There’s a reason why everyone around the world wishes they could live in the USA, and not China or Russia, and that reason is because the citizens of the USA are protected by a US Constitution that guarantees personal Liberty, personal Rights, and especially personal Property ownership. The great challenge for USA citizens is to fight-off the Liberal Progressive Left and Neocon Fascists who all want to abolish the US Constitution, want to abolish the USA as an independent sovereign nation-state, and want to subordinate North America to the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy. The choice is not between the BIS/WEF/NATO and Xi’s BRICS+, but between Globalism (Technocratic Fascism) and Nationalism (The American System of Political Economy).