Are Russia and China in on the Great Reset? My Response to James Corbett
Are Russia and China in on the Great Reset? My Response to James Corbett
Yesterday, I was invited by my friend Hrvoje Morik onto his new show on TNT Radio to discuss a short response to a new viral video that has been produced by James Corbett earlier this week.
Corbett’s video advances the thesis that Russia and China are both controlled opposition to the western unipolar Great Reset Agenda and are actually in cahoots as part of a grand game to enslave the world.
I share interview because the willingness to believe that every nation is controlled by a sociopathic oligarchy out to kill us is tied to a deep cultural sickness of nihilism, pessimism and the belief that humanity is intrinsically corrupt and doomed. That level of cynicism is attractive partially because it alleviates each of us from having to take responsibility for righting injustices or risking our personal security in order to intervene upon an evil self-destructive system (for how could we make something Good which is evil by its very nature?)
This cynical way of thinking also appeals to our own tendency to wish to remain voyeurs watching and commenting upon reality as if each of us were not also integrated into the system which we were voyeuristically trying to watch as if it were reality TV.
My preliminary written remarks (which I feature here below) were shared by our mutual friend Joaquin Flores on his excellent Telegram Channel (T.me/NewResistance), and the discussion with Hrvoje are also featured below.
Listen on Soundcloud
Or watch on Bitchute here
Preliminary Thoughts Upon Watching Corbett’s new Viral Video ‘Shocking Document Reveals Trudeau (Putin and Xi’s) Real Plan’
My preliminary reaction after watching this argument is a bewilderment that Corbett is completely incapable of ever looking at what Russia or China are actually doing in terms of actions which undermine the depopulation agenda. There are currently the largest development projects now underway pulling over 1 billion out of poverty led by China's Belt and Road Initiative which is in total opposition to the depopulation program yet it's like none of that exists.
Another paradox that Corbett seems to be happy ignoring: if all sides are all controlled and have been so long, then why didn't the oligarchy get their technocratic feudalism a LONG time ago. I mean George Soros had his own agent (Zhao Ziyang) in thee highest position of power in China ready to privatize everything under the fourth industrial revolution (in 1983!!) So why was that agent arrested with his allies (a few who evaded arrest by sneaking off to the USA and Canada) and Soros given a lifetime ban from China?
All of Russia was brought under total control during the privatization 1990s of Yeltsin with NATO and Soros taking control of the entire post Soviet space. Today Soros is banned and many of the leading Russian oligarchs created during that time are in sanctuary in London and Florida. Why? Why didn't that level of influence continue? Why did oligarchs get sent to prison and see their privatized state assets re-nationalized? Why did Russia not let the Syrians get the Iraq treatment or let Venezuela get a regime change in favor of WEF agent Juan Guaido? Why not let Kazakhstan get a Soros regime change treatment a couple of months ago? Why promote National banking when the oligarchy wants all central banks private?
Yes AI and digital currency will be used by Eurasia, but what is their function?
How is the system functioning differently in which such things would be used? Are digital currencies or AI intrinsically evils or is there a principle of function, design and intent that determines whether tools will be used to enslave or support human life?
I get really annoyed with pattern-formation thinking advocated by alt media black pilled libertarian commentators who appear to have giddy-fetishes for dissecting evil to such an extreme degree that when evidence of the Good is right in front of their face, their polarized intellectual lenses cannot see it.
Im going to write something on this with the title "so you're too smart to hope" or "an ode to the black pilled"
Supplementary Reading Material for those Hungry for More Context:
The Collision of Two Opposing Green Destinies
The Multipolar Alliance as the Last Line of Defense of the UN Charter
How China's Gorbachev Was Flushed in 1989
Who is Creating a New Chinese Boogey Man? (An Examination of Modern Psychological Warfare)
Beijing, Five Eyes or Something Else: Who's to Blame for the Covid Pandemic
Do Xi Jinping’s Davos Remarks Prove He is a Globalist Shill? “By their fruits ye shall know them”
Debunking Anti-Chinese Psy Ops Part 1: Social Credit as Distasteful Necessity in an Age of Asymmetric Warfare
Debunking Anti-Chinese Psy Ops Part 3: Jesuits, Tavistock and the Battle for the Soul of China
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , and Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow. He is author of the ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series and Clash of the Two Americas. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation .
Pretty sure the Canada/US joint statement was used as a sort of prop for the main gag of the video, which was to reveal it as not actually a Canada/US joint statement, but a Russia/China joint statement. I thought he made that pretty clear in the video, particularly around the 14 minute mark. Just to clear that up for people.
I doubt that defining directives and influencing a cluster of institutions that make up a Nation State is a terribly orderly and predictable pastime. Rather riddled with compromise and intransigence and various kinds of 'blowback'.
I suspect that Putin may have been play - acting with the Western and the Globalist upper echelon when chumming up with the great reset table at the club, whilst looking for advantage for Russia and for his own political advantage, and is continuing to do so. He may have wanted to judge for himself whether Schwab or others had the energy of a Bismark or a Belarius.
Yet another possible view could be that Russia's move with Ukraine might have been very largely to do with domestic power politics, undertaken despite Ukranian and Western opposition, and may be serving to unify the Russian command echelon and clean house of Western corruption within Russia, and only secondarily to improve 'Indo-European' and possibly Turkish relations with Russia, and Ukraine just happens to be a means to an end.
They have been preparing for it for quite a few years after all.