it is also interesting that jane was not the first - NBC made such a claim earlier and another network 'suggested' its collapse - thing is the SEC was located in building 7 - meaning the files on Enron - the largest scam in history at the time though now would loose out to covid - were 'lost' so destruction of building 7 would be built i…
it is also interesting that jane was not the first - NBC made such a claim earlier and another network 'suggested' its collapse - thing is the SEC was located in building 7 - meaning the files on Enron - the largest scam in history at the time though now would loose out to covid - were 'lost' so destruction of building 7 would be built into the narrative during the 'planning' stage - to get an understanding of the magnitude of the 9/11 attack view network footage of ground zero that day - all network footage was available until at least 2012 when i viewed the footage on archives.org which has now hidden the complete broadcasts leaving only a few short pieces - my links to the footage are permalinks and therefore still viewable on my site vigilantcanadian.ca
"....First off, all serious researchers aside from Morgan Reynolds (a former Bush economist) agree that planes actually hit the towers, however the planes that hit the towers had no windows and extra equipment attached (PODs) and are believed to be remote control drone aircraft. In fact, a similar plan was devised in 1962 by Robert McNamara called OPERATION NORTHWOODS which detailed flying an aircraft filled with FBI agents (allegedly college students on vacation) in flight the plane would switch transponder signals with a drone aircraft which would then be shot down over Cuba. The FBI agents on the plane would then land safely and resume new covert identities. There is evidence that a similar plot was hatched on 9/11:
Thomas Deatherage, Former Airline Captain B- 747-400 and B- 737-300: "After viewing many posted videos on "Youtube" I can tell you without hesitation that clearly aircraft # 2 B-767 - was radio controlled into the building Tower 2. The "pod" mounted on the bottom of the aircraft, is manufactured by "Martin Marietta" Corporation in Los Angeles. The pod has been used extensively by the USAF for outfitting drone aircraft for over 22 years, and you can clearly see it in (4) of the amateur videos- just before impact, with tower # 2. Also, I would like to find an insider A and P mechanic at both United and America to cross reference the A/C serial number of flight 77 and 93. I guarantee that they change the N issued tail number. However, one could trace and find this original A/C, from an insider employee, at these companies- leading to the smoking gun these aircraft were not destroyed."
This is excellent INTEL Smith - thank you very much. I have worked with UK SIS in the past (commercial) and know precisely how the MoD works. I have been tracked since the 1970s especially when I was in East Germany in 1984, Belarus in 1994 and subsequently in Simons Town (SA) in 2002.
The MIC (Military Intelligence Complex) is vast and all survielling. There is no option but to play the game - so I ask: "Is Occam's Razor worth applying to this question" - well, is this an orange? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLz9ewBt-dw
Yes that's a good one. And that goes back to the remote controlled planes. It's obvious Flight 93 was meant to crash into WTC7 which was pre-wired with explosive & thermite cutting charges. So the remote control pod malfunctioned and the plane veered off course so it was shot down, spreading debris over a wide area. And no it did not fly into a little hole in the ground.
They claim the plane was flown straight down at 580mph and burrowed its way 40 ft into the ground. And the 2 black boxes located in the tail of the plane managed somehow to bury themselves 10ft & 25ft into the ground. That is flatly impossible, the plane would have to displace a half million kgs of sand in a less than a half a second. Newton's second law of motion. F=ma. The forces exerted on the plane structure would be immense and rip the plane into pieces, spread over the surface of the ground for hundreds of meters in the direction of the plane's velocity at initial impact.
That's why a 50cal BMG armor piercing round traveling at over 2000mph will only penetrate about 2ft of sand. See video:
" how many sand bags does it take to stop a 50 cal rifle? "
Notice how the bullet casing is shredded by the impact leaving only the ultra-hard, super-dense, tungsten core.
GermanWings Flight 9525 crashed into the side of hill @ 430mph and the flight data recorder penetrated 8 inches of soil. Rest of the plane, bodies, debris, engines, seats, luggage, cargo scattered over 2 sq km .
Thank you Smith - you are clearly well advised and I am grateful for your sharing. These things are not often discussed, even in private company. My life experience has been broad ranging and exciting in parts interspersed with long periods of peace and serenity. I am grateful to my Maker for his blessings and my preservation thus far - although at 78 I don't push the limits too far now!
morgan reynolds was in Bush's administration on 9/11 as the lead economist in the dept of labour he is prof emeritus at Texas A and M university and a director of the Mise institute of Alabama - the fountain heard of Austrian school of economics - stated in a Fox news interview in 2006 "American airlines flights 11 and 77 aren't even in the Bureau of Transportation Data Base for that day" meaning no flight plans were filed - the lack of any debris pile for the twin towers - a part of the lobby facade of the south tower is still standing and is the tallest thing around - we did not witness a 'controlled demolition' as the term is generally believed - part of building 4 has 'disappeared building 6 has a large hole cored out with no debris in the hole - the idea of fake planes and pods is just a distraction to occupy people's time rather than focussing on the fact that the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Bush administration committed High Treason on 9/11 - forget distraction focus on the High Treason charge
No they were clearly controlled demolitions, several thousand architects & structural engineers as well as demolition experts have testified to that. You can see the standard 45 deg cutting charge cuts on vertical beams in the wreckage. And the vast quantity of thermite residue in the dust spread all over, there is no possible way it got there except by use of large amounts of thermite cutting charges. KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid. No need to invent alien technology for something that is all quite straightforward, using standard off the shelf tech.
So, here’s a theory I’m grappling with as, despite having read about a dozen books on 9/11, there’s still so much for me to learn. Here’s what I’m wondering: fighter jets were never scrambled from Andrew’s air base, 10 miles from Washington, because that’s where the hijacked planes were landed and where the drones which hit WTC were taken off from, a La Operation Northwoods? The various war games that were being carried out in the sky that morning which were on FAA’s radars simply added to the chaos and confusion? That’s to say nothing of the passengers on the planes. Do we know if any body parts identified from WTC were passengers on the planes? Forgive me if these questions seem idiotic but I’m still some way off piecing the jigsaw together
There is an air force base that was evacuated, in that region, that morning, all personnel sent home for the day, I read about it, but forget the name. The drones could have taken off from there or anywhere else, a airline pilot saw a plane with the pod mounted underneath before 9/11, parked at an airport, he asked around and was told it was for remote control operation. So likely the actual planes flew to the evacuated military base and that's where the passengers made the impossible phone calls from (i.e. they couldn't have been made on a moving plane). Including one call where a girl left a message for her boyfriend that ended with the quick phrase "it's a frame". Also some of the phrases used by the passengers in the phone calls were unusual, like they were reading from a script, written by someone who was foreign raised. Likely there the passengers were gassed and murdered. The CIA developed fentanyl gas for that purpose.
it is also interesting that jane was not the first - NBC made such a claim earlier and another network 'suggested' its collapse - thing is the SEC was located in building 7 - meaning the files on Enron - the largest scam in history at the time though now would loose out to covid - were 'lost' so destruction of building 7 would be built into the narrative during the 'planning' stage - to get an understanding of the magnitude of the 9/11 attack view network footage of ground zero that day - all network footage was available until at least 2012 when i viewed the footage on archives.org which has now hidden the complete broadcasts leaving only a few short pieces - my links to the footage are permalinks and therefore still viewable on my site vigilantcanadian.ca
This is the footage they really want to have buried:
9/11 PODs and Remote Control Plane Theory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMayTWzOGY0
9/11 PODs and Remote Control Plane Theory - video Dailymotion WTC2 video, Flight 175, Boeing 767-222/ER:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2p7wmu
Gallery | 9/11 Anomalies Plane Boeing 767 crash into WTC2 pictures, remote control pod
https://911anomalies.wordpress.com/gallery/
"....First off, all serious researchers aside from Morgan Reynolds (a former Bush economist) agree that planes actually hit the towers, however the planes that hit the towers had no windows and extra equipment attached (PODs) and are believed to be remote control drone aircraft. In fact, a similar plan was devised in 1962 by Robert McNamara called OPERATION NORTHWOODS which detailed flying an aircraft filled with FBI agents (allegedly college students on vacation) in flight the plane would switch transponder signals with a drone aircraft which would then be shot down over Cuba. The FBI agents on the plane would then land safely and resume new covert identities. There is evidence that a similar plot was hatched on 9/11:
Thomas Deatherage, Former Airline Captain B- 747-400 and B- 737-300: "After viewing many posted videos on "Youtube" I can tell you without hesitation that clearly aircraft # 2 B-767 - was radio controlled into the building Tower 2. The "pod" mounted on the bottom of the aircraft, is manufactured by "Martin Marietta" Corporation in Los Angeles. The pod has been used extensively by the USAF for outfitting drone aircraft for over 22 years, and you can clearly see it in (4) of the amateur videos- just before impact, with tower # 2. Also, I would like to find an insider A and P mechanic at both United and America to cross reference the A/C serial number of flight 77 and 93. I guarantee that they change the N issued tail number. However, one could trace and find this original A/C, from an insider employee, at these companies- leading to the smoking gun these aircraft were not destroyed."
This is excellent INTEL Smith - thank you very much. I have worked with UK SIS in the past (commercial) and know precisely how the MoD works. I have been tracked since the 1970s especially when I was in East Germany in 1984, Belarus in 1994 and subsequently in Simons Town (SA) in 2002.
The MIC (Military Intelligence Complex) is vast and all survielling. There is no option but to play the game - so I ask: "Is Occam's Razor worth applying to this question" - well, is this an orange? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLz9ewBt-dw
Yes that's a good one. And that goes back to the remote controlled planes. It's obvious Flight 93 was meant to crash into WTC7 which was pre-wired with explosive & thermite cutting charges. So the remote control pod malfunctioned and the plane veered off course so it was shot down, spreading debris over a wide area. And no it did not fly into a little hole in the ground.
They claim the plane was flown straight down at 580mph and burrowed its way 40 ft into the ground. And the 2 black boxes located in the tail of the plane managed somehow to bury themselves 10ft & 25ft into the ground. That is flatly impossible, the plane would have to displace a half million kgs of sand in a less than a half a second. Newton's second law of motion. F=ma. The forces exerted on the plane structure would be immense and rip the plane into pieces, spread over the surface of the ground for hundreds of meters in the direction of the plane's velocity at initial impact.
That's why a 50cal BMG armor piercing round traveling at over 2000mph will only penetrate about 2ft of sand. See video:
" how many sand bags does it take to stop a 50 cal rifle? "
youtube.com/watch?v=7fBvHhBrBJg
Notice how the bullet casing is shredded by the impact leaving only the ultra-hard, super-dense, tungsten core.
GermanWings Flight 9525 crashed into the side of hill @ 430mph and the flight data recorder penetrated 8 inches of soil. Rest of the plane, bodies, debris, engines, seats, luggage, cargo scattered over 2 sq km .
Thank you Smith - you are clearly well advised and I am grateful for your sharing. These things are not often discussed, even in private company. My life experience has been broad ranging and exciting in parts interspersed with long periods of peace and serenity. I am grateful to my Maker for his blessings and my preservation thus far - although at 78 I don't push the limits too far now!
morgan reynolds was in Bush's administration on 9/11 as the lead economist in the dept of labour he is prof emeritus at Texas A and M university and a director of the Mise institute of Alabama - the fountain heard of Austrian school of economics - stated in a Fox news interview in 2006 "American airlines flights 11 and 77 aren't even in the Bureau of Transportation Data Base for that day" meaning no flight plans were filed - the lack of any debris pile for the twin towers - a part of the lobby facade of the south tower is still standing and is the tallest thing around - we did not witness a 'controlled demolition' as the term is generally believed - part of building 4 has 'disappeared building 6 has a large hole cored out with no debris in the hole - the idea of fake planes and pods is just a distraction to occupy people's time rather than focussing on the fact that the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Bush administration committed High Treason on 9/11 - forget distraction focus on the High Treason charge
No they were clearly controlled demolitions, several thousand architects & structural engineers as well as demolition experts have testified to that. You can see the standard 45 deg cutting charge cuts on vertical beams in the wreckage. And the vast quantity of thermite residue in the dust spread all over, there is no possible way it got there except by use of large amounts of thermite cutting charges. KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid. No need to invent alien technology for something that is all quite straightforward, using standard off the shelf tech.
So, here’s a theory I’m grappling with as, despite having read about a dozen books on 9/11, there’s still so much for me to learn. Here’s what I’m wondering: fighter jets were never scrambled from Andrew’s air base, 10 miles from Washington, because that’s where the hijacked planes were landed and where the drones which hit WTC were taken off from, a La Operation Northwoods? The various war games that were being carried out in the sky that morning which were on FAA’s radars simply added to the chaos and confusion? That’s to say nothing of the passengers on the planes. Do we know if any body parts identified from WTC were passengers on the planes? Forgive me if these questions seem idiotic but I’m still some way off piecing the jigsaw together
There is an air force base that was evacuated, in that region, that morning, all personnel sent home for the day, I read about it, but forget the name. The drones could have taken off from there or anywhere else, a airline pilot saw a plane with the pod mounted underneath before 9/11, parked at an airport, he asked around and was told it was for remote control operation. So likely the actual planes flew to the evacuated military base and that's where the passengers made the impossible phone calls from (i.e. they couldn't have been made on a moving plane). Including one call where a girl left a message for her boyfriend that ended with the quick phrase "it's a frame". Also some of the phrases used by the passengers in the phone calls were unusual, like they were reading from a script, written by someone who was foreign raised. Likely there the passengers were gassed and murdered. The CIA developed fentanyl gas for that purpose.
Jesus Christ
All true Guy IMHO: Is this fake - techy team say not?
https://www.truth11.com/building-7/?ref=Truth11.com-newsletter