Discussion about this post

User's avatar
LT Robert Powell's avatar

Matt - Within the limited ( by man ) concept of learning, this is fascinating in especially the Masonic

portion of the most informative article or discussion. My great Grandfathers were Masons, while they kept the oaths, they did not consider the group malovent. I note one, simplistic issue in that the repression of the time, ( travel ) being one, that their had to be a language that allowed both travel and protection in each town. The masonry work was common, news needed passing, so

the use of symbols was imparted for "in your face" protection. Just one tiny bit for your reservoir

of knowledge. My apologies, being 80, and not of good economic structure now, funding is not an option. My sincere trust others have the abilities to support you amazing works. Be blessed.

Expand full comment
Mr_Mayhem's avatar

It’s kinda funny how “un-profound” the occult favorites are, the forms remind me of static Lego blocks, Aristotelian toys for children.

Kinda like having the cool car with the cool air-inlet scoops, but inert, non-functional. Even as a kid, I rejected fake air-scoops.

Contrast the occult’s favorite “shape worship” (worshipping idols, heh) with how the fetus morphs into a baby.

There is a whole world of ultra-profound processes we haven’t figured out yet.

My thoughts are that they are related to how form is encoded through the pipeline, how one unfolding is pregnant with another.

The dynamic and periodic, seem much closer to the hidden forms than any of the mystery schools’ favorite symbols, perhaps allowing that most of the important proportions can be found in standing wave interaction patterns, which also hints at a bridge between the static and periodic or cyclic. There are many interesting relationships, including the boundary conditions of the standing waves, like the static non-moving part contrasted to the moving part. Coincidence of Opposites!

Are these forms alternated to extend design intent across morphology? Would appear like noun-verb-noun on the surface.

I used to code. A lot. I keep thinking of how a program (perhaps not digital in the familiar sense) can write another more specific or “lower-scale focused” program, and so on, like nested Russian dolls. The spiral of creation? Even the question of how these chains would “settle” into least-action optimums in lawful ways, boggles the brain, but approaches the more profound questions from yet another angle.

One quasi-digital model is the completion of a cycle, or loop. It’s related to the quantum, or quantized anything; period closure is implied.

One interesting interpretation is called by a favorite AI teacher “the condition of satisfaction”. Its purpose is to “know” when to quit doing a cycle, because it has accomplished its local goal within the system.

This is akin to, well, reaching any goal. So therefore it’s directly relevant to my pet subject, “bootstrapping”, where goals are pursued in lawful sequences, by creating the conditions necessary to do so first.

When one goal is reached to a certain degree of satisfaction, you move on to the next bigger one, generally. Not unlike growing a garden, or a small business, or anything that resembles “rising to the occasion.” A big part of keeping momentum on a project, is knowing when to “shift to a higher gear”; the condition of satisfaction, again.

But a developing life form is like a whole new ballgame. Just for a simple question, how does it know when to stop a given growth ensemble? What is life’s “condition of satisfaction? It it related to least-action, or least-entropy?

So much to learn in that set of possibilities…

Thanks, Matt, for giving us a mini-tour of how these get perverted and labeled “secret knowledge” after being hollowed-out.

The real question is what symbols does life use to do its thing, beyond the famed “golden ratio”. We are not there yet.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts