Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Grimerica Outlawed's avatar

Interesting Insight! Comprehensive. It requires a second read lol. Some connections in here I did not realize.

For audio versions of many of these books referenced check out our podcast or find them where audiobooks are sold. Spotify is a good place now....

Isis Unveiled 1 and 2, Secret Doctrine - all 3, Alvin Boyd Kuhn's - Theosophy, John Yarker - Arcane Schools, Arthur Conan Doyle's - History of Spiritualism, Steiner, Manly P. Hall, Max Heindel, Thoreau, Crowley, and more.

https://adultbrain.ca/

Expand full comment
Richard Leger's avatar

Hello Matt,

Very interesting article, as I got to the part where you stated "As outlined in part 4 of this series, the Transcendentalists knew exactly what they were doing.", I thought of a video I'd seen a few days before: https://rumble.com/v3oaskh--bankers-wars.html

So when you say "they knew what they were doing", I wondered if these people were pushing these theosophistic ideologies spontaneously, or if similarly to these days, elements linked to the old British banking systems, monarchies, occult societies, etc. might have been influencing and/or guiding, supporting these individuals?

If Rivero's assertions are correct, then it wouldn't be much of a stretch to believe that the old British banking families and such would be trying to fracture or destroy the US by means of helping to create, or at the very least financially and/or ideologically supporting the theosophists, would it? And if one were to suppose that, would there be any evidence of it to be found anywhere in the historical record (which is why I wanted to ask you, knowing very well how deeply you normally dive into the historical record).

Not that I think that Emerson himself would require any guiding of course, I believe that he could well take care of his writings without any help whatsoever.

And while on the subject of Emerson, what would you surmise his motives to have been to subvert the American nation, or would his motives not have been focused on the US nation, but more along the lines of fighting against Christian religion which he would have held contempt for?

I hope my questions are not way off the mark, and if there is a lot of context that I'm missing which would invalidate these inquiries, I apologize in advance.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts